Thursday, August 18, 2016
Alexandra Mayers Clark County Nevada Court Filing; Jennifer Randazza / Randazza Legal Group. Ari Bass aKa Michael Whiteacre, Sean Tompkins, Mike South aKa Michael Strother, Marc Randazza.
Source
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bypu5iLNbbmwQzdWblcxNHlaS3M/view
AND
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bypu5iLNbbmwUFBmRWtnUHFVLWM/view
Alexandra Mayers Reports; "Michael Strother / Mike South states WHO posed as Jennifer Randazza requesting my help, AFTER Marc Randazza offered legal services to Strother to sue me"
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Sunday, August 14, 2016
Bankruptcy Cry Baby Victim Marc Randazza. RANDAZZA has me, Crystal Cox the Biggest Creditor in this CASE, yet I have no Rights and my LAWSUIT against him, as my former attorney is simply FROZEN. Marc Randazza, attorney, has used the Nevada Bankruptcy courts as a tool to violate the rights of his former clients, and to STOP legal action again him.
"Debtor’s misguided criticisms of the IAA are an example of Debtor’s attempt to portray himself as a victim"
Source and Full Motion
http://ia801505.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.155.0.pdf
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BY CREDITORS EXCELSIOR MEDIA CORP., AND LIBERTY MEDIA
HOLDINGS, LLC TO DETERMINE NON-DISCHARGEABILITY OF DEBTS
"III. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
7. Defendant Randazza is the former in-house General Counsel of E/L. Randazza was employed as E/L’s General Counsel continuously from June, 2009 until August 2012.
8. Excelsior is a sister company to various entities including Liberty and Corbin Fisher. Corbin Fisher is an on-line entertainment website and brand name whose intellectual
property is owned by Liberty. Excelsior is a film production company that creates videos for the Corbin Fisher brand.
E/L has consistently endeavored to and succeeded at conducting its business in a principled and professional manner. E/L relocated its headquarters from San Diego, California to Las Vegas in February 2011.
9. Randazza also relocated from San Diego, California to Las Vegas in 2011 to continue his employment relationship with E/L. Randazza markets himself as a “specialist” in First Amendment and intellectual property law, particularly with regard to the adult entertainment industry.
10. E/L and Randazza became acquainted while Randazza was an associate at a firm specializing in First Amendment related legal work in Florida. E/L later decided to hire a General Counsel. Randazza pursued and accepted the position. Randazza drafted an employment agreement, which was executed by the parties in June, 2009 (“Employment Agreement”).
Randazza at no time advise Plaintiffs that they should seek independent counsel to review the agreement even though Plaintiffs were obviously unrepresented. During the course of his
employment with E/L, Randazza was an integral part of E/L’s management and, along with several other executives, participated in making many of E/L’s major corporate decisions.
11. The primary reason E/L decided to hire a General Counsel was to ensure its intellectual property was protected. One of the most significant challenges faced by E/L and all companies in the film and entertainment industry is the illegal downloading and sharing of content/videos produced by E/L. However, Randazza was tasked with handling all of E/L’s legal matters.
A. THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
12. Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Randazza was to wind down his private practice during his first 90 days of employment and become E/L’s full-time General Counsel.
13. Section “6.C” of the Employment Agreement permitted Randazza to continue to provide professional services to a “limited number of outside clients” during non-working hours if such work did not present a conflict of interest for E/L. Contrary to his obligations under the Employment Agreement and without the knowledge of E/L, Randazza continued to aggressively grow his private practice during his employment after becoming E/L’s General Counsel.
14. Randazza’s compensation consisted of an annual salary of $208,000. Randazza also included in the Employment Agreement the unique arrangement of a nondiscretionary bonus of 25% of any settlement funds paid to E/L.
15. At the time of the execution of the Employment Agreement, the parties contemplated that Randazza would be handling all of E/L’s legal matters independently. Instead, Randazza began to utilize his own firm, Randazza Legal Group (“RLG”) and various outside counsel to assist in E/L’s legal matters.
16. The Employment Agreement also required that E/L provide Randazza with a laptop computer and PDA/phone, which were to be primarily used for E/L business with only occasional and incidental personal use permitted. The Employment Agreement further provided that such equipment was not to be used for professional services rendered to other clients.
17. The Employment Agreement provided for severance in the amount of 12 weeks of salary if E/L were to unilaterally terminate Randazza in the fourth year of employment or later.
There is no severance obligation if Randazza resigned or was terminated for cause.
18. The Employment Agreement also includes a governing law provision stating “[t]his Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict of laws.” Randazza was able to reside virtually anywhere he wanted. Initially, Randazza lived and worked in San Diego, California. However, Randazza relocated to Las Vegas, Nevada in June 2011, just as few months after E/L relocated its headquarters.
19. At Randazza’s request, E/L hired Erika Dillon (“Dillon”), a paralegal. Dillon was employed by E/L as a paralegal at the time of Randazza’s resignation. Dillon left her employment after Randazza’s resignation at Randazza’s request B. ISSUES ARISE BETWEEN E/L AND RANDAZZA
i. Randazza’s Non-E/L Work
20. As noted above, under the Employment Agreement Randazza was obligated to wind down his private practice during the first 90 days of his employment with E/L.
21. After becoming E/L’s General Counsel, however, Randazza kept adding clients to his practice, RLG, and over the period from October 2009 through August 2012, he billed over 1,643 hours to clients for work unrelated to E/L (and not including pro bono work). This amounts to an average of 47 hours per month.
During Randazza’s employment at E/L, he never billed less than 14.5 hours in a given month to other clients and in many months he billed between 50 and 90 hours to such clients. During the period from September 2011 through January 2012, Randazza billed 390.65 hours to non-E/L and non-pro bono clients, an average of over 78 hours per month.
This pattern of extensive and increasing work for non-E/L clients is evidence that Randazza had no intention of winding down his private practice as required by the Employment Agreement.
22. During his employment with E/L, including during the period from September 2011 through January 2012, E/L paid Randazza’s full salary and benefits, including bar dues in multiple jurisdictions.
ii. Randazza’s TNAFlix Relationship
23. Randazza, through RLG, represented Liberty in a lawsuit that he filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against TNAFlix (“TNA”) (Case. No. 10-CV-1972-JHA-POR) alleging that TNA (a file-sharing website) infringed Liberty’s copyrighted works (the “TNA Matter”). Valentin Gurvits, Esq. (“Gurvits”) of the Boston Law Group, LLP (“Boston Law”) represented TNA.
24. In December 2010 and January 2011, Randazza and Gurvits negotiated a settlement of the TNA Matter. During the course of those negotiations, Gurvits raised a concern about his client (TNA) being sued by other copyright owners in the future based on the same or similar allegations made by Liberty against TNA in the TNA matter.
In an email dated December 7, 2010, Randazza advised Gurvits that he “could largely prevent other plaintiffs from entering the fray.”
25. According to Randazza, Gurvits wanted to pay Randazza a “fee” of $5,000 in order to conflict Randazza out of future cases against TNA. In an email dated December 22, 2010, Randazza responded to Gurvits’ offer as follows:
For example, on January 11, 2011 Randazza wrote in an email to Gurvits:
Keeping me out of the TNA game is a little more complicated.
If your client wants to keep me personally out of the TNA game, then I think that there needs to be a little grave for me. And it has to be more than the $5k you were talking about before, I’m looking at the cost of at least a new Carrera in retainer deposits after circulating around the adult entertainment expo this week. I’m gonna want at least used BMW money.
In order to conflict me out of future matters, I suggest this:
Your firm retains me as “of counsel” to you. I get $5k per month (for six months) paid to me, from you (TNA will reimburse you, I presume). I will render advice on TNA and TNA only, and I’ll be Chinese walled from your other clients so that other conflicts are not created.
*******************************
That way, I’m adequately compensated for my loss of major potential work, and I’m conflicted out of acting adversely to TNA.
27. On January 12, 2011, Randazza apparently discovered that he was ethically prohibited from discussing limitations on his right to practice law during the course of settlement negotiations on behalf of a client, and sent an email to Gurvits saying that he could no longer discuss it, saying: “But I’m certain now that such an arrangement is unethical, in the terms we’ve been discussing it.” Nevertheless, Randazza recommended finding “some other way of addressing [TNA’s] interests,” and stated as follows:
Like I said before, if TNA wants to hire me *after* settlement, on terms that we discuss *after* settlement, then my phone line will be open.
However, it seems that if we place any part of a “buyoff” as a condition of settlement, then all four of us could wind up in bar trouble. I’m certainly not risking it.
28. On February 1, 2011, Liberty signed a Settlement Agreement and General Release of Claims (the “TNA Settlement Agreement”) under which Liberty agreed to dismiss its claims against TNA without prejudice in exchange for payment of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00).
The next day (February 2, 2011) and before Randazza had even received the signature of Gurvits’ client on the TNA Settlement Agreement and the sameday that Randazza received the settlement payment from TNA, Randazza sent an email to Gurvits asking if TNA wanted “a retainer letter form [him].”
29. On February 11, 2011 Randazza emailed Gurvits a draft retainer letter from TNA to sign, which required a $36.000.00 retainer to be paid at the outset of the representation and deemed to be earned upon receipt. TNA did not, however, immediately sign the retainer letter, Randazza wrote to Gruvits in late June 2011 stating, “You will recall that I am not conflicted out of representing another client against [TNA].”
Source and Full Document, Case Filing
http://ia801505.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.156.0.pdf
How in the WORLD is Marc Randazza still a Lawyer? WOW
Source and Full Motion
http://ia801505.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.155.0.pdf
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BY CREDITORS EXCELSIOR MEDIA CORP., AND LIBERTY MEDIA
HOLDINGS, LLC TO DETERMINE NON-DISCHARGEABILITY OF DEBTS
"III. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
7. Defendant Randazza is the former in-house General Counsel of E/L. Randazza was employed as E/L’s General Counsel continuously from June, 2009 until August 2012.
8. Excelsior is a sister company to various entities including Liberty and Corbin Fisher. Corbin Fisher is an on-line entertainment website and brand name whose intellectual
property is owned by Liberty. Excelsior is a film production company that creates videos for the Corbin Fisher brand.
E/L has consistently endeavored to and succeeded at conducting its business in a principled and professional manner. E/L relocated its headquarters from San Diego, California to Las Vegas in February 2011.
9. Randazza also relocated from San Diego, California to Las Vegas in 2011 to continue his employment relationship with E/L. Randazza markets himself as a “specialist” in First Amendment and intellectual property law, particularly with regard to the adult entertainment industry.
10. E/L and Randazza became acquainted while Randazza was an associate at a firm specializing in First Amendment related legal work in Florida. E/L later decided to hire a General Counsel. Randazza pursued and accepted the position. Randazza drafted an employment agreement, which was executed by the parties in June, 2009 (“Employment Agreement”).
Randazza at no time advise Plaintiffs that they should seek independent counsel to review the agreement even though Plaintiffs were obviously unrepresented. During the course of his
employment with E/L, Randazza was an integral part of E/L’s management and, along with several other executives, participated in making many of E/L’s major corporate decisions.
11. The primary reason E/L decided to hire a General Counsel was to ensure its intellectual property was protected. One of the most significant challenges faced by E/L and all companies in the film and entertainment industry is the illegal downloading and sharing of content/videos produced by E/L. However, Randazza was tasked with handling all of E/L’s legal matters.
A. THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
12. Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Randazza was to wind down his private practice during his first 90 days of employment and become E/L’s full-time General Counsel.
13. Section “6.C” of the Employment Agreement permitted Randazza to continue to provide professional services to a “limited number of outside clients” during non-working hours if such work did not present a conflict of interest for E/L. Contrary to his obligations under the Employment Agreement and without the knowledge of E/L, Randazza continued to aggressively grow his private practice during his employment after becoming E/L’s General Counsel.
14. Randazza’s compensation consisted of an annual salary of $208,000. Randazza also included in the Employment Agreement the unique arrangement of a nondiscretionary bonus of 25% of any settlement funds paid to E/L.
15. At the time of the execution of the Employment Agreement, the parties contemplated that Randazza would be handling all of E/L’s legal matters independently. Instead, Randazza began to utilize his own firm, Randazza Legal Group (“RLG”) and various outside counsel to assist in E/L’s legal matters.
16. The Employment Agreement also required that E/L provide Randazza with a laptop computer and PDA/phone, which were to be primarily used for E/L business with only occasional and incidental personal use permitted. The Employment Agreement further provided that such equipment was not to be used for professional services rendered to other clients.
17. The Employment Agreement provided for severance in the amount of 12 weeks of salary if E/L were to unilaterally terminate Randazza in the fourth year of employment or later.
There is no severance obligation if Randazza resigned or was terminated for cause.
18. The Employment Agreement also includes a governing law provision stating “[t]his Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict of laws.” Randazza was able to reside virtually anywhere he wanted. Initially, Randazza lived and worked in San Diego, California. However, Randazza relocated to Las Vegas, Nevada in June 2011, just as few months after E/L relocated its headquarters.
19. At Randazza’s request, E/L hired Erika Dillon (“Dillon”), a paralegal. Dillon was employed by E/L as a paralegal at the time of Randazza’s resignation. Dillon left her employment after Randazza’s resignation at Randazza’s request B. ISSUES ARISE BETWEEN E/L AND RANDAZZA
i. Randazza’s Non-E/L Work
20. As noted above, under the Employment Agreement Randazza was obligated to wind down his private practice during the first 90 days of his employment with E/L.
21. After becoming E/L’s General Counsel, however, Randazza kept adding clients to his practice, RLG, and over the period from October 2009 through August 2012, he billed over 1,643 hours to clients for work unrelated to E/L (and not including pro bono work). This amounts to an average of 47 hours per month.
During Randazza’s employment at E/L, he never billed less than 14.5 hours in a given month to other clients and in many months he billed between 50 and 90 hours to such clients. During the period from September 2011 through January 2012, Randazza billed 390.65 hours to non-E/L and non-pro bono clients, an average of over 78 hours per month.
This pattern of extensive and increasing work for non-E/L clients is evidence that Randazza had no intention of winding down his private practice as required by the Employment Agreement.
22. During his employment with E/L, including during the period from September 2011 through January 2012, E/L paid Randazza’s full salary and benefits, including bar dues in multiple jurisdictions.
ii. Randazza’s TNAFlix Relationship
23. Randazza, through RLG, represented Liberty in a lawsuit that he filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against TNAFlix (“TNA”) (Case. No. 10-CV-1972-JHA-POR) alleging that TNA (a file-sharing website) infringed Liberty’s copyrighted works (the “TNA Matter”). Valentin Gurvits, Esq. (“Gurvits”) of the Boston Law Group, LLP (“Boston Law”) represented TNA.
24. In December 2010 and January 2011, Randazza and Gurvits negotiated a settlement of the TNA Matter. During the course of those negotiations, Gurvits raised a concern about his client (TNA) being sued by other copyright owners in the future based on the same or similar allegations made by Liberty against TNA in the TNA matter.
In an email dated December 7, 2010, Randazza advised Gurvits that he “could largely prevent other plaintiffs from entering the fray.”
25. According to Randazza, Gurvits wanted to pay Randazza a “fee” of $5,000 in order to conflict Randazza out of future cases against TNA. In an email dated December 22, 2010, Randazza responded to Gurvits’ offer as follows:
As far as conflicting me out of future cases, that will require significantly more than $5,000. In fact, I have someone waiting in the wings with a $50k retainer right now. Naturally, I’m in a strange ethical bind, as your offer to conflict me out of future cases against your client is something that would benefit my current client. Accordingly, I would be willing to be conflicted out of cases against TNA, but that $5k figure has to come up. Either that, or you can give [Liberty] what they asked for, and I’ll conflict myself out for a token payment26. Randazza and Gurvits continued to discuss the prospect of conflicting Randazza out of future cases against TNA during the course of negotiating a settlement of the TNA Matter.
For example, on January 11, 2011 Randazza wrote in an email to Gurvits:
Keeping me out of the TNA game is a little more complicated.
If your client wants to keep me personally out of the TNA game, then I think that there needs to be a little grave for me. And it has to be more than the $5k you were talking about before, I’m looking at the cost of at least a new Carrera in retainer deposits after circulating around the adult entertainment expo this week. I’m gonna want at least used BMW money.
In order to conflict me out of future matters, I suggest this:
Your firm retains me as “of counsel” to you. I get $5k per month (for six months) paid to me, from you (TNA will reimburse you, I presume). I will render advice on TNA and TNA only, and I’ll be Chinese walled from your other clients so that other conflicts are not created.
*******************************
That way, I’m adequately compensated for my loss of major potential work, and I’m conflicted out of acting adversely to TNA.
27. On January 12, 2011, Randazza apparently discovered that he was ethically prohibited from discussing limitations on his right to practice law during the course of settlement negotiations on behalf of a client, and sent an email to Gurvits saying that he could no longer discuss it, saying: “But I’m certain now that such an arrangement is unethical, in the terms we’ve been discussing it.” Nevertheless, Randazza recommended finding “some other way of addressing [TNA’s] interests,” and stated as follows:
Like I said before, if TNA wants to hire me *after* settlement, on terms that we discuss *after* settlement, then my phone line will be open.
However, it seems that if we place any part of a “buyoff” as a condition of settlement, then all four of us could wind up in bar trouble. I’m certainly not risking it.
28. On February 1, 2011, Liberty signed a Settlement Agreement and General Release of Claims (the “TNA Settlement Agreement”) under which Liberty agreed to dismiss its claims against TNA without prejudice in exchange for payment of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00).
The next day (February 2, 2011) and before Randazza had even received the signature of Gurvits’ client on the TNA Settlement Agreement and the sameday that Randazza received the settlement payment from TNA, Randazza sent an email to Gurvits asking if TNA wanted “a retainer letter form [him].”
29. On February 11, 2011 Randazza emailed Gurvits a draft retainer letter from TNA to sign, which required a $36.000.00 retainer to be paid at the outset of the representation and deemed to be earned upon receipt. TNA did not, however, immediately sign the retainer letter, Randazza wrote to Gruvits in late June 2011 stating, “You will recall that I am not conflicted out of representing another client against [TNA].”
Source and Full Document, Case Filing
http://ia801505.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.156.0.pdf
How in the WORLD is Marc Randazza still a Lawyer? WOW
Sue Sue Sue. Chill Speech Chill Speech. First Amendment Attorney, Law Firm Randazza Legal Group LOVES to SUE people to SILENCE them. And all in the Name of Free Speech. Meanwhile he hides behind a bankruptcy court in Cox v. Randazza, with NO end in sight.
Porn Blogger Mike South aka Michael Strother THREATENS to Sue Monica Foster. oH and for FREE with us of Unconstitutional, Unethical attorney Marc Randazza of Rabid Randazza Legal Group.
There are so many people that Marc Randazza has offered to represent for FREE to Silence Free Speech that exposes him. oh and to RETALIATE. Meanwhile he does not even have the stamina to stay in legal cases with us, he has to HIDE in bankruptcy court while doing FREE legal work out of unethical SPITE.
So, this Guy, Mike South aka Michael Strother, calls himself a PIMP and then threatens to Sue others who call him a Pimp too? WTF
"How in the hell would Randazza Legal Group attorneys (who've already filed one fraudulent lawsuit against me in regards to Jennifer Randazza's attachment to organized crime) and Michael Strother explain the above to a Judge? In addition how will Randazza Legal Group explain to a Judge that they are offering their legal services pro-bono to self labeled PIMPS (who are not owners and/or operators of legal brothels in Nevada) - all in effort to silence individuals who have opted to share the truth about sex trafficking and the adult entertainment industry?
According to wikipedia and many other sources - a pimp is a sex trafficker.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_trafficking
Definition of “PIMP” according to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary: a criminal who is associated with, usually exerts control over, and lives off the earnings of one or more prostituteshttp://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pimp
I will not be apologizing to Mike South aka Michael Strother. In addition, he will not be suing me for "libel", as his entire proposed lawsuit has no legitimacy or merit.
I encourage you all to read and sign this petition I wrote, just a day prior to Mike South aka Michael Strother's lawsuit threat: https://www.change.org/p/michael-weinstein-aids-healthcare-foundation-differentiate-illegal-prostitutes-from-legitimate-pornstars"
There are so many people that Marc Randazza has offered to represent for FREE to Silence Free Speech that exposes him. oh and to RETALIATE. Meanwhile he does not even have the stamina to stay in legal cases with us, he has to HIDE in bankruptcy court while doing FREE legal work out of unethical SPITE.
So, this Guy, Mike South aka Michael Strother, calls himself a PIMP and then threatens to Sue others who call him a Pimp too? WTF
"How in the hell would Randazza Legal Group attorneys (who've already filed one fraudulent lawsuit against me in regards to Jennifer Randazza's attachment to organized crime) and Michael Strother explain the above to a Judge? In addition how will Randazza Legal Group explain to a Judge that they are offering their legal services pro-bono to self labeled PIMPS (who are not owners and/or operators of legal brothels in Nevada) - all in effort to silence individuals who have opted to share the truth about sex trafficking and the adult entertainment industry?
According to wikipedia and many other sources - a pimp is a sex trafficker.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_trafficking
Definition of “PIMP” according to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary: a criminal who is associated with, usually exerts control over, and lives off the earnings of one or more prostituteshttp://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pimp
I will not be apologizing to Mike South aka Michael Strother. In addition, he will not be suing me for "libel", as his entire proposed lawsuit has no legitimacy or merit.
I encourage you all to read and sign this petition I wrote, just a day prior to Mike South aka Michael Strother's lawsuit threat: https://www.change.org/p/michael-weinstein-aids-healthcare-foundation-differentiate-illegal-prostitutes-from-legitimate-pornstars"
Source of Above
Mike South aka Michael Strother has threatened to sue me for my stating what he's labeled himself as - a PIMP
On August 13, 2016 veteran porn blogger Mike South aka Michael Strother stated that he would take Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's offer to sue me (apparently Randazza offered his legal services to Strother pro-bono). Strother indicated that he would sue me for "libel" because I claimed that he is a pimp and involved in sex trafficking.
Source of Above
I wonder what Marc Randazza's Creditors think of all his Pro Bono legal cases he offers and takes, and all in the name of REVENGE and nothing to do with Justice or making money to pay off his CREDITORS.
Marc Randazza Bankruptcy
Randazza vs. Crystal Cox Free Speech Suppression Case Docket
Wednesday, July 27, 2016
Monday, July 25, 2016
Saturday, June 4, 2016
"I said what needed to be said in court before a hike through the Valley of Fire
I suppose the events that took place around 9am on May 31, 2016 have been in the works for several years. Before the Honorable Judge Rob Bare in room 3C of the Las Vegas Clark County court house located at 200 Lewis Ave - I, Alexandra Mayers, represented and defended myself in Civil Case A-14-699072-C
As of June 4, 2016 the Judge's ruling for case A-14-699072-C is still PENDING. It was explained in court that sometimes case rulings are decided in court immediately, but other times the rulings take a while...
Regardless of the outcome of this case - I've closed a major chapter of my life by saying what's needed to be said for a very long time in a court of law (and on official court record) about the presence of ORGANIZED CRIME and PEDOPHILIA in the pornographic industry (specifically attached to the porn industry's political face - the Free Speech Coalition). As of May 31, 2016 the Clark County Judicial and Legal system is fully aware of the truth of the porn industry - which is nothing more but a modern day illegal slave system.
Civil case A-14-699072-C has felt like a perpetual runner's cramp since April of 2014. As a long distance runner, I know quite well that the only way to rid yourself of an intense runner's cramp is to WALK IT OFF - so I did just that in Nevada's Valley Of Fire."
Source
http://monicafoster.blogspot.com/2016/06/i-said-what-needed-to-be-said-in-court.html?zx=6c247e85eb1795b0
I suppose the events that took place around 9am on May 31, 2016 have been in the works for several years. Before the Honorable Judge Rob Bare in room 3C of the Las Vegas Clark County court house located at 200 Lewis Ave - I, Alexandra Mayers, represented and defended myself in Civil Case A-14-699072-C
As of June 4, 2016 the Judge's ruling for case A-14-699072-C is still PENDING. It was explained in court that sometimes case rulings are decided in court immediately, but other times the rulings take a while...
Regardless of the outcome of this case - I've closed a major chapter of my life by saying what's needed to be said for a very long time in a court of law (and on official court record) about the presence of ORGANIZED CRIME and PEDOPHILIA in the pornographic industry (specifically attached to the porn industry's political face - the Free Speech Coalition). As of May 31, 2016 the Clark County Judicial and Legal system is fully aware of the truth of the porn industry - which is nothing more but a modern day illegal slave system.
Civil case A-14-699072-C has felt like a perpetual runner's cramp since April of 2014. As a long distance runner, I know quite well that the only way to rid yourself of an intense runner's cramp is to WALK IT OFF - so I did just that in Nevada's Valley Of Fire."
Source
http://monicafoster.blogspot.com/2016/06/i-said-what-needed-to-be-said-in-court.html?zx=6c247e85eb1795b0
Friday, May 20, 2016
Marc Randazza, Hypocritical Attorney representing another DISGUSTING, Unethical Attorney just like him. Marc Randazza seems to say when you are offended, called names, and well abused then you should be an ADULT and Shrug it OFF.
Why is this ASSHOLE still an attorney? Can't Judges, Attorney General's, Detectives, the DOJ, or any authority READ. Marc Randazza has CLEARLY violated the rights of client after client. He defends pedophiles, and should be indicted as far as I see it. Yet he is still YAPPING as if what he says has ANY credibility.
" Feldman regrets “demonstrating a lack of impulse control” in sending the email."
Source
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2016/05/12/end-yourselves-councilwomen-threatened-after-voting-against-seattles-nba-arena/
Oh ya Marc Randazza clients can email whatever they want. But if Crystal Cox emails an attorney, acting as her own attorney, in a PRIVATE CONFIDENTIAL settlement agreement, then that is EXTORTION and Marc Randazza shouts from every rooftop and in every big media that will listen that she is an Extortionist. And he published my private email in mass, knowing it was being painted in false light as he had acted as my attorney. That private email was made to be EVIL and Randazza can ruin lives, flat out lie about whoever he wants, threaten people and say whatever LIE he wants and that is ok, legal and ethical??
But oh yeah my client is abusive, and an asshole like me but he is sorry, so sorry.
FUCK You Marc Randazza. IT IS NOT ok for you to RUIN LIVES with your LIES. Why do you still have a license to represent clients?? WOW.
"“He has come to realize that his reactions, and the communications he sent, were over the top, and that his tendency to this kind of behavior is a long-standing problem,” said Marc J. Randazza, a First Amendment attorney who represents Jason M. Feldman, in a statement. “He unequivocally apologizes to the recipients of his abusive comments.”
Source of this Marc Randazza, Hyprocrite ASSHOLE Attorney quote
http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2016/05/09/attorney-admits-emails-to-female-city.html
"“As women, I understand that you spend a lot of your time trying to please others (mostly on your knees) but I can only hope that you each find ways to quickly and painfully end yourselves,” the email said. “Each of you should rot in hell for what you took from me yesterday.”
Randazza – who last week suggested the councilmembers should do “what an adult would do” and shrug it off – said Feldman is seeking help from mental health professionals.
“This event has forced him to confront his impulse control issues,” the statement said. “After consulting with professionals, friends, and family, he recognizes that he has a problem and that that problem has hurt other people – not just in this circumstance, but in multiple occasions in the past.”
Source
http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2016/05/09/attorney-admits-emails-to-female-city.html
Fucktard Hypocritical Mean, Evil Marc Randazza says do what an adult should do and shrug it off??? WOW WTF? Marc Randazza ruined massive lives, sued so many people, threatened us, ruined our lives or relationships or reputations, harassed us, attacked us, demeaned us, exposed our private lives, gave out our home address and more private information, stole massive intellectual property, incited massive hate against us, and all we did was call his wife a slut and make fun of him, and buy a few domain names. WHY DIDN'T Marc Randazza JUST ACT LIKE AN ADULT AND SHRUG IT OFF?
Marc Randazza is the MOST Hypocritical, Unethical, Unconstitutional Attorney in the WORLD.
" Feldman regrets “demonstrating a lack of impulse control” in sending the email."
Source
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2016/05/12/end-yourselves-councilwomen-threatened-after-voting-against-seattles-nba-arena/
Oh ya Marc Randazza clients can email whatever they want. But if Crystal Cox emails an attorney, acting as her own attorney, in a PRIVATE CONFIDENTIAL settlement agreement, then that is EXTORTION and Marc Randazza shouts from every rooftop and in every big media that will listen that she is an Extortionist. And he published my private email in mass, knowing it was being painted in false light as he had acted as my attorney. That private email was made to be EVIL and Randazza can ruin lives, flat out lie about whoever he wants, threaten people and say whatever LIE he wants and that is ok, legal and ethical??
But oh yeah my client is abusive, and an asshole like me but he is sorry, so sorry.
FUCK You Marc Randazza. IT IS NOT ok for you to RUIN LIVES with your LIES. Why do you still have a license to represent clients?? WOW.
"Attorney admits emails to female city councilmembers were 'abusive,' apologizes"
"“He has come to realize that his reactions, and the communications he sent, were over the top, and that his tendency to this kind of behavior is a long-standing problem,” said Marc J. Randazza, a First Amendment attorney who represents Jason M. Feldman, in a statement. “He unequivocally apologizes to the recipients of his abusive comments.”
Source of this Marc Randazza, Hyprocrite ASSHOLE Attorney quote
http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2016/05/09/attorney-admits-emails-to-female-city.html
"“As women, I understand that you spend a lot of your time trying to please others (mostly on your knees) but I can only hope that you each find ways to quickly and painfully end yourselves,” the email said. “Each of you should rot in hell for what you took from me yesterday.”
Randazza – who last week suggested the councilmembers should do “what an adult would do” and shrug it off – said Feldman is seeking help from mental health professionals.
“This event has forced him to confront his impulse control issues,” the statement said. “After consulting with professionals, friends, and family, he recognizes that he has a problem and that that problem has hurt other people – not just in this circumstance, but in multiple occasions in the past.”
Source
http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2016/05/09/attorney-admits-emails-to-female-city.html
Fucktard Hypocritical Mean, Evil Marc Randazza says do what an adult should do and shrug it off??? WOW WTF? Marc Randazza ruined massive lives, sued so many people, threatened us, ruined our lives or relationships or reputations, harassed us, attacked us, demeaned us, exposed our private lives, gave out our home address and more private information, stole massive intellectual property, incited massive hate against us, and all we did was call his wife a slut and make fun of him, and buy a few domain names. WHY DIDN'T Marc Randazza JUST ACT LIKE AN ADULT AND SHRUG IT OFF?
Wednesday, May 11, 2016
Marc Randazza and Jennifer Randazza have NO CASE against Crystal Cox or Eliot Bernstein. And they NEVER had a case. Yet they managed to STEAL massive online content and search engine placement and to redirect that intellectual property to hate sites and defamatory sites about the defendants they sued. This is NOT OK, NOT Ethical and Not Legal. But WOW now there is precedent so you too can STEAL Domain Names, SEO, Search Engine Placement, Intellectual Property and Online Speech you don't Like.
Read the DENIAL of the Summary Judgement which CLEARLY Shows that Marc Randazza and Jennifer Randazza have NO Case against Blogger Crystal L. Cox or iViewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein
http://ia800304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf
http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20FDCO%2020140411A31/RANDAZZA%20v.%20COX
AND
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiTGt4dEdQXzV0aE0/view
I put a few links to the same document, because Marc Randazza's CRONIES change links to CHILL SPEECH and alter reality.
Full Docket Marc Randazza, Jennifer Randazza, Babydazza Vs. Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein
http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html
Study Every Document and Filing and LEARN How Unethical Attorneys WORK the SYSTEM, Chill Online Speech, Shut down blogs they don't like, Steal Search Engine Placement, bully and harass litigants
Use the Docket Above to SHUT DOWN ANY Online Speech You don't Like. Just Like the District of Nevada let Marc Randazza and Jennifer Randazza, along with Attorney Ronald Green and their Law Firm Randazza Legal Group and WITH No Liability or Accountability what so ever.
oh and if the people you STEAL from or shut down their speech put up to much of a fight and want to sue you for Liable, for Defamation, for Misrepresentation NO Problem, File for Bankruptcy, to Learn how study the Marc Randazza Bankruptcy Docket and related information.
http://ia601505.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.docket.html
oh and don't forget if you don't like an online parody about you or a whistleblower or insider exposing you or making fun of you, then you can simply use the Nevada State Courts, check out Randazza vs. Monica Foster, Alexandra Mayers in Clark County Nevada.
http://www.publicfigurestoday.com/tag/clark-county/
http://www.publicfigurestoday.com/2014/05/17/the-lawsuits-alexandra-mayers-aka-monica-foster-is-facing-the-truth-of-the-porn-industry-organized-crime/
http://pornnewstoday.com/pnt/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/statement-attorney-Ronald-D-Green-aka-Jamieprofit-twitter-stalker-UNETHICAL.pdf
http://ia800304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf
http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20FDCO%2020140411A31/RANDAZZA%20v.%20COX
AND
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiTGt4dEdQXzV0aE0/view
I put a few links to the same document, because Marc Randazza's CRONIES change links to CHILL SPEECH and alter reality.
Full Docket Marc Randazza, Jennifer Randazza, Babydazza Vs. Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein
http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html
Study Every Document and Filing and LEARN How Unethical Attorneys WORK the SYSTEM, Chill Online Speech, Shut down blogs they don't like, Steal Search Engine Placement, bully and harass litigants
Use the Docket Above to SHUT DOWN ANY Online Speech You don't Like. Just Like the District of Nevada let Marc Randazza and Jennifer Randazza, along with Attorney Ronald Green and their Law Firm Randazza Legal Group and WITH No Liability or Accountability what so ever.
oh and if the people you STEAL from or shut down their speech put up to much of a fight and want to sue you for Liable, for Defamation, for Misrepresentation NO Problem, File for Bankruptcy, to Learn how study the Marc Randazza Bankruptcy Docket and related information.
http://ia601505.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.docket.html
oh and don't forget if you don't like an online parody about you or a whistleblower or insider exposing you or making fun of you, then you can simply use the Nevada State Courts, check out Randazza vs. Monica Foster, Alexandra Mayers in Clark County Nevada.
http://www.publicfigurestoday.com/tag/clark-county/
http://www.publicfigurestoday.com/2014/05/17/the-lawsuits-alexandra-mayers-aka-monica-foster-is-facing-the-truth-of-the-porn-industry-organized-crime/
http://pornnewstoday.com/pnt/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/statement-attorney-Ronald-D-Green-aka-Jamieprofit-twitter-stalker-UNETHICAL.pdf
Thursday, April 14, 2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)