tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-47049553242739951102024-03-05T11:08:31.025-08:00Reverend Crystal Cox Experience With Attorney Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal GroupUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger147125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-74383454336766221962021-03-20T02:20:00.007-07:002021-03-20T02:20:41.981-07:00“Our First Amendment and Intellectual property counsel is Marc Randazza and the Randazza Legal Group,” OH THE DOUBLE STANDARD IRONY OF IT ALL. Marc Randazza the MOST Corrupt Attorney ANYWHERE. Still at Large.. Things that make you say Hmmm.<p> </p><div class="post-outer" style="background-color: white; border-top: none; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin: 0px -15px; padding: 0px 15px 10px;"><div class="post hentry uncustomized-post-template" itemprop="blogPost" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/BlogPosting" style="min-height: 0px; position: relative;"><div class="post-body entry-content" id="post-body-4900526021369131782" itemprop="description articleBody" style="line-height: 1.4; position: relative; width: 786px;"><p><span style="font-size: large;">"<span style="background-color: #fafafa; color: #7b7b7b; font-family: "Lucida Console", Monaco, monospace; white-space: pre-wrap;">*This is an opinion article and doesn't reflect the publication standings *</span></span></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://www.dwight-schar-victims.org/about-dwight-schar/dwight-schars-bella-collina-florida-continues-to-scare-residents-and-lose" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Dwight Schar</a> accused in court documents of extortion and gangster-like conduct, is represented by <a href="https://www.corruptrandazza.com/news/corrupt-attorney-marc-randazza-represents-dwight-schar-and-bella-collina" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">corrupt attorney Marc Randazza</a> who also represents neo-Nazi and the port industry. </span></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://www.dwight-schar-victims.org/about-dwight-schar/dwight-schar-opposes-black-lives-matter-sign-in-his-bella-collina" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Dwight Schar</a>, founder of Ryan Homes and the failed <a href="https://sites.google.com/view/bella-collina-homes/news/real-estate-news-bella-collina-homes-are-drastically-losing-value?authuser=0" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Bella Collina</a> community in Florida. But he also represents PissedConsumer.com, a website that allows people to create fake reviews of a product or service and has been accused of unfairly ruining business reputations online while misusing the decency act (47 U.S.C. § 230, a Provision of the Communication <span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: 700; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Decency Act</span> Tucked inside the Communications <span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: 700; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Decency Act</span>)</span></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">“Our First Amendment and Intellectual property counsel is<a href="https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/89117-nv-marc-randazza-1269075.html" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank"> Marc Randazza</a> and the<a href="https://randazza.com/" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank"> Randazza Legal Group</a>,” brags <a href="https://www.pissedconsumer.com/static/legal-information/marc-randazza.html" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">PissedConsumer.com</a>. PissedConsumer is a platform meant for reviews, much like Yelp or reviews on Amazon. But unlike Yelp, Pissedconsumer allows anonymous users from anywhere in the world to assault businesses with fake reviews, alleging anything from fraud to malpractice. </span></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Pissed Consumer is a Russian/Ukrainian affiliated business owned by Americans who live in Las Vegas. It has been accused by small business owners of exploiting the protection behind Section 230 of the CDA in order to destroy small businesses. “It only wants negative consumer reviews of businesses (as signaled by its name), and its basic business model is to rank the negative consumer reviews highly in Google search results and then charge the businesses money to take the edge off that indexing,” writes one <a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2012/06/pissedconsumer.htm" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">blog</a>. </span></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">This particular platform gives random people the power to defame small businesses, independent contractors, and people desperately trying to make a living by sabotaging their reputation. Pissed Consumer protects the identity of whoever chooses to be anonymous.</span></p><h2 style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-weight: 500; line-height: 1.35; margin: 0.83em 0px 0.5em; padding: 0px; position: relative; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: 700; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">PissedConsumer Accused of Ruining Lives</span> and Small Businesses</span></h2><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Business <a href="https://www.abcactionnews.com/money/consumer/dont-waste-your-money/how-one-bad-review-can-hurt-a-good-business" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">owners</a> and contractors have told stories of how their online reputation sank after a few undeserved bad reviews. “Because if it is a small coffee shop, maybe it’s a new coffee shop, a couple of negative reviews can really impact that business,” said Nick McVey to ABC News. </span></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">“Now it seems anyone can leave a review. Regardless, if they used your service or not,” wrote Robert Anspach. Unfortunately, that gives rise to another problem: the exploitation of small business owners. </span></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">In 2018, security experts in <a href="https://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/404477-hackers-increasingly-target-reputations-through-reviews-sites-experts" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">The Hill</a> warned that hackers were taking advantage of platforms like Yelp and Pissed Consumer in order to destroy reputations of small businesses. “It is definitely an increase that we see — that more and more hackers are misusing the whole brand reputation and any type of review process to blackmail and extort companies,” Candid Wueest, a Symantec threat researcher based in Europe, told The Hill.</span></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Hackers held an airline at ransom, threatening to destroy its reputation if the business did not pay the hackers in bitcoin. </span></p><div class="wp-block-image" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1em; padding: 0px; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline;"><figure class="aligncenter size-large" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; clear: both; display: table; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 5px auto 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-align: center; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;"><img alt="PISSEDCONSUMER-Asking-10-60000-per-year-to-hide-information-from-Google-accused-of-EXTORTION-of-small-businesses-by-Michael-Podolsky-from-consumer-Opinion-" class="wp-image-505" data-pin-no-hover="true" height="576" loading="lazy" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" src="https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Asking-10-60000-per-year-to-hide-information-from-Google-accused-of-EXTORTION-of-small-businesses-by-Michael-Podolsky-from-consumer-Opinion--1024x576.png" srcset="https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Asking-10-60000-per-year-to-hide-information-from-Google-accused-of-EXTORTION-of-small-businesses-by-Michael-Podolsky-from-consumer-Opinion--1024x576.png 1024w, https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Asking-10-60000-per-year-to-hide-information-from-Google-accused-of-EXTORTION-of-small-businesses-by-Michael-Podolsky-from-consumer-Opinion--300x169.png 300w, https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Asking-10-60000-per-year-to-hide-information-from-Google-accused-of-EXTORTION-of-small-businesses-by-Michael-Podolsky-from-consumer-Opinion--768x432.png 768w, https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Asking-10-60000-per-year-to-hide-information-from-Google-accused-of-EXTORTION-of-small-businesses-by-Michael-Podolsky-from-consumer-Opinion--1536x864.png 1536w, https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Asking-10-60000-per-year-to-hide-information-from-Google-accused-of-EXTORTION-of-small-businesses-by-Michael-Podolsky-from-consumer-Opinion--750x422.png 750w, https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Asking-10-60000-per-year-to-hide-information-from-Google-accused-of-EXTORTION-of-small-businesses-by-Michael-Podolsky-from-consumer-Opinion--1140x641.png 1140w, https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Asking-10-60000-per-year-to-hide-information-from-Google-accused-of-EXTORTION-of-small-businesses-by-Michael-Podolsky-from-consumer-Opinion-.png 1920w" style="background: transparent; border-radius: 0px; border: 0px; box-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2) 0px 0px 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; height: auto; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; max-width: 100%; padding: 0px; vertical-align: middle;" width="1024" /></span><figcaption style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; caption-side: bottom; color: #a0a0a0; display: table-caption; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0.5em 0px 1em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">PISSEDCONSUMER-Asking-10-60000-per-year-to-hide-information-from-Google-accused-of-EXTORTION-of-small-businesses-by-Michael-Podolsky-from-consumer-Opinion</span></figcaption></figure></div><h2 style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-weight: 500; line-height: 1.35; margin: 0.83em 0px 0.5em; padding: 0px; position: relative; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: 700; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Corrupt Randazza At The Center of 5 State Bar Investigations</span></span></h2><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://www.dwight-schar-victims.org/about-dwight-schar/why-the-nevada-bar-still-allows-corrupt-marc-randazza-to-practice-law" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">The State Bar of Nevada</a> charged Randazza for violating Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct on nine counts. He broke the rules in regards to: </span></p><ul style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; list-style: square; margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; padding: 0px 0px 0px 2.14286em; vertical-align: baseline;"><li style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Communication, </span></li><li style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Conflict of Interest: Current Clients, </span></li><li style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Conflict of Interest: Current Clients: Specific Rules, </span></li><li style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Imputation of Conflicts of Interest, </span></li><li style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Safekeeping Property, </span></li><li style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Declining or Terminating Representation, Advisor, </span></li><li style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Restrictions on Right to Practice, </span></li><li style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Misconduct. </span></li></ul><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://www.dwight-schar-victims.org/about-dwight-schar/dwight-schar-involved-in-3-companies-guilty-of-deceptive-consumer-practices" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Dwight Schar has been accused</a> by multiple people of unsavory business tactics. One of his companies, <a href="https://www.dwight-schar-victims.org/about-dwight-schar/dwight-schar-uses-corrupt-attorney-randazza-for-possibly-illegal-actions" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Ryan Homes</a>, was investigated by USA Today and sent a letter from Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH). The senator pleaded with Ryan Homes to stop some of its practices that were harming consumers. </span></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">The Merriam Webster definition of corrupt is “dishonest or illegal behavior.”</span></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Not only was Randazza investigated by the <a href="https://www.nvbar.org/" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Nevada State Bar</a>, but also he was investigated by four other states: Massachusetts, Arizona, Florida, and California. He has also been suspended by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. </span></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Legal registry <a href="https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/89117-nv-marc-randazza-1269075.html#client_reviews" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Avvo</a> rated him 1 out 10 with “extreme caution” because he had received disciplinary action. Several five-star reviews boosted his profile, however, some of them were very long and very poorly written. They also talked about irrelevant points, including “love and respect.” </span></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://twitter.com/Dwight_Schar" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Dwight Schar</a> and Bella Collina have chosen this particular attorney to represent them. <a href="https://www.dwight-schar-victims.org/about-dwight-schar/dwight-schars-attorney-marc-randazza-is-on-the-florida-bar-violations-news" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Schar</a> is now associated with an attorney who has major <a href="https://twitter.com/Dwight_Schar/status/1329120219743207424" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">ethical violations</a> attached to his name, who tries to strike at the racial divide in America. </span></p><h2 style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-weight: 500; line-height: 1.35; margin: 0.83em 0px 0.5em; padding: 0px; position: relative; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: 700; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Does Randazza Represent Free Speech? Or Just Porn, Extortion, Pedophilia, and Nazis?</span></span></h2><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Marc Randazza styles himself a <a href="https://www.corruptrandazza.com/opinions/marc-randazza-against-free-speech-claiming-hes-not-corrupt-lol" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">free speech</a> lawyer. However, he has no problem with creating false copyright notices to take down another’s free expression. </span></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">But when it comes to Neo-Nazis, <a href="https://www.corruptrandazza.com/news/why-the-florida-bar-still-allows-corrupt-marc-randazza-to-practice-law" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Randazza</a> prefers to work with them. HuffPost writes that “<a href="https://www.corruptrandazza.com/news/marc-randazza-with-bribery-gay-porn-and-copyright-trolls" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">outrageous</a>” Randazza is “<a href="https://www.huffpost.com/entry/alex-jones-lawyer-marc-randazza_n_5c1c283ae4b08aaf7a86b9e4" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">curiously chummy</a>” with fascists and racists. Randazza has also represented several Neo-Nazis in court, including <a href="https://www.corruptrandazza.com/news/marc-randazza-ditched-his-neo-nazi-client-andrew-anglin" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Andrew Anglin</a>, who published the address of a Jewish realtor on the Nazi website The Daily Stormer. </span></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">In some pieces written for humor/legal blog <a href="https://www.popehat.com/2017/01/17/randazza-legalize-child-porn/" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Popehat</a>, Randazza made the argument for legalizing child pornography. “I am going to make the case for legalization of <a href="https://www.corruptrandazza.com/news/dwight-schar-uses-corrupt-attorney-randazza-for-possibly-illegal-actions" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">child pornography</a>,” he wrote. He argued that photos of babies in bathtubs, pictures of girlfriends, and children in bathing suits could be classified as child pornography. <a href="https://www.corruptrandazza.com/news/public-warning-against-marc-randazza" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Randazza</a> even admitted, “I expect to have this very post used against me in the future.”</span></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">He also suggested in the blog that <a href="https://www.popehat.com/2017/05/15/randazza-public-masturbation-as-protected-speech/" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">public masturbation</a> could be considered freedom of speech. “I think that the <em style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Gatewood</em> decision leaves the question open as to whether you might be able to beat off in public there because you ‘fucking hate Portland,’” he wrote. </span></p><h2 style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-weight: 500; line-height: 1.35; margin: 0.83em 0px 0.5em; padding: 0px; position: relative; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Why Google Permits Pissedconsumer To Hide Bad Reviews For Money? Is Google Part of Possible EXTORTION?</span></h2><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">PISSEDCONSUMER Denied section 230 immunity and can’t shake extortion claim Asking $10-60,000 per year to hide information from Google accused of EXTORTION of small businesses by Michael Podolsky from consumer Opinion – Why Google permits this conduct?</span></p><div class="wp-block-image" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1em; padding: 0px; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline;"><figure class="aligncenter size-large" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; clear: both; display: table; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 5px auto 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-align: center; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;"><img alt="PISSEDCONSUMER Denied section 230 immunity and can't shake extortion claim Asking $10-60,000 per year to hide information from Google accused of EXTORTION of small businesses by Michael Podolsky from consumer Opinion - Why Google permits" class="wp-image-507" data-pin-no-hover="true" height="576" loading="lazy" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" src="https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Denied-section-230-immunity-1024x576.png" srcset="https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Denied-section-230-immunity-1024x576.png 1024w, https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Denied-section-230-immunity-300x169.png 300w, https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Denied-section-230-immunity-768x432.png 768w, https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Denied-section-230-immunity-1536x864.png 1536w, https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Denied-section-230-immunity-750x422.png 750w, https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Denied-section-230-immunity-1140x641.png 1140w, https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Denied-section-230-immunity.png 1920w" style="background: transparent; border-radius: 0px; border: 0px; box-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2) 0px 0px 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; height: auto; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; max-width: 100%; padding: 0px; vertical-align: middle;" width="1024" /></span><figcaption style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; caption-side: bottom; color: #a0a0a0; display: table-caption; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0.5em 0px 1em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">PISSEDCONSUMER Denied section 230 immunity and can’t shake extortion claim Asking $10-60,000 per year to hide information from Google accused of EXTORTION of small businesses by Michael Podolsky from consumer Opinion – Why Google permits</span></figcaption></figure></div><pre class="wp-block-preformatted" style="background: rgb(250, 250, 250); border: 1px solid rgb(238, 238, 238); box-sizing: border-box; color: #7b7b7b; font-family: "Lucida Console", Monaco, monospace; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.75em; margin-top: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0.5em 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><span style="font-size: large;">*This is an opinion, impression article presenting a point of view to be considered and there are other opinions regarding the individuals and entities mentioned in this article. You may search other information and find other opinions.*</span></pre><h2 style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-weight: 500; line-height: 1.35; margin: 0.83em 0px 0.5em; padding: 0px; position: relative; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Additional Resources Curated (not verified for truthfulness)</span></h2><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://www.bbb.org/us/nv/las-vegas/profile/internet-service/consumer-opinion-llc-1086-90052400/complaints" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">https://www.bbb.org/us/nv/las-vegas/profile/internet-service/consumer-opinion-llc-1086-90052400/complaints</span></a></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://unmasked-michael-podolsky.blogspot.com/2019/11/webactivismcom-owner-michael-podolsky.html" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">https://unmasked-michael-podolsky.blogspot.com/2019/11/webactivismcom-owner-michael-podolsky.html</span></a></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://www.complaintsboard.com/vladimir-soyfer-and-fairfax-smiles-fake-negative-reviews-by-webactivismcom-owner-michael-podolsky-c1072884" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">https://www.complaintsboard.com/vladimir-soyfer-and-fairfax-smiles-fake-negative-reviews-by-webactivismcom-owner-michael-podolsky-c1072884</span></a></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.pissedconsumer.com" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.pissedconsumer.com</span></a></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://www.sitejabber.com/reviews/pissedconsumer.com" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">https://www.sitejabber.com/reviews/pissedconsumer.com</span></a></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-09-24-Ascentive%20Complaint.pdf" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-09-24-Ascentive%20Complaint.pdf</span></a></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://marketingland.com/increase-extortion-fueled-reputation-attacks-points-need-legal-change-228898" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">https://marketingland.com/increase-extortion-fueled-reputation-attacks-points-need-legal-change-228898</span></a></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://www.reviews.io/company-reviews/store/www-pissedconsumer-com" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">https://www.reviews.io/company-reviews/store/www-pissedconsumer-com</span></a></p><figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-wp-embed is-provider-cheater-board wp-block-embed-cheater-board" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;"><iframe class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="vzGt5BMf5d" frameborder="0" height="353" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" sandbox="allow-scripts" scrolling="no" security="restricted" src="https://www.cheaterboard.com/sex-predator-and-convicted-pedophile-michael-podolsky-aka-mikhail-podolsky-is-the-owner-of-webactivism-com-removal-ny/embed/#?secret=vzGt5BMf5d" style="border-style: initial; border-width: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; max-width: 100%; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" title="“Sex Predator and Convicted Pedophile Michael Podolsky aka Mikhail Podolsky is the owner of WebActivism.com Removal NY” — Cheater Board" width="600"></iframe></span></div></figure><figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-wp-embed is-provider-technology-amp-marketing-law-blog wp-block-embed-technology-amp-marketing-law-blog" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline;"><blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="WZszGOwspV" style="border-color: rgb(238, 238, 238); border-image: initial; border-style: solid; border-width: 0px 0px 0px 4px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: italic; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: bold; line-height: 1.5em; margin: 1em 1.25em; padding: 0px 0px 0px 1em; quotes: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2012/06/pissedconsumer.htm" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #212121; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">PissedConsumer Denied Section 230 Immunity and Can’t Shake Extortion Claim—Vo v. Opinion Corp.</span></a></blockquote></div></figure><p><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-size: large;">Source</span></p><p><a href="https://www.smye-holland.com/2021/02/13/randazza-represents-pissedconsumer-a-company-with-russian-ties-accused-of-extorting-small-businesses/" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">https://www.smye-holland.com/2021/02/13/randazza-represents-pissedconsumer-a-company-with-russian-ties-accused-of-extorting-small-businesses/</span></a><br /></p><div style="clear: both;"></div></div><div class="post-footer" style="line-height: 1.6; margin: 1.5em 0px 0px;"><div class="post-footer-line post-footer-line-1"><span class="post-author vcard" style="margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 1em;">Posted by <span class="fn" itemprop="author" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/Person"><span itemprop="name">Crystal L. Cox</span> </span></span><span class="post-timestamp" style="margin-left: -1em; margin-right: 1em;">at <a class="timestamp-link" href="http://randazzalegalgroupsucks.blogspot.com/2021/02/our-first-amendment-and-intellectual.html" rel="bookmark" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none;" title="permanent link"><abbr class="published" itemprop="datePublished" style="border: none;" title="2021-02-14T16:12:00-08:00">16:12</abbr></a> </span><span class="post-comment-link" style="margin-right: 1em;"><a class="comment-link" href="http://randazzalegalgroupsucks.blogspot.com/2021/02/our-first-amendment-and-intellectual.html#comment-form" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none; white-space: nowrap;">No comments: </a></span><span class="post-icons" style="margin-right: 1em;"><span class="item-control blog-admin pid-505454002" style="display: inline;"><a href="https://draft.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=3674754427241227157&postID=4900526021369131782&from=pencil" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none;" title="Edit Post"><img alt="" class="icon-action" height="18" src="https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif" style="border-color: initial; border-image: initial; border-style: none !important; border-width: initial; margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.5em !important; position: relative; vertical-align: middle;" width="18" /> </a></span></span><div class="post-share-buttons goog-inline-block" style="display: inline-block; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0.5em; position: relative; vertical-align: middle;"><a class="goog-inline-block share-button sb-email" href="https://draft.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogID=3674754427241227157&postID=4900526021369131782&target=email" style="background: url("/img/share_buttons_20_3.png") 0px 0px no-repeat !important; color: blue; display: inline-block; height: 20px; margin-left: -1px; overflow: hidden; position: relative; text-decoration-line: none; width: 20px;" target="_blank" title="Email This"><span class="share-button-link-text" style="display: block; text-indent: -9999px;">Email This</span></a><a class="goog-inline-block share-button sb-blog" href="https://draft.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogID=3674754427241227157&postID=4900526021369131782&target=blog" style="background: url("/img/share_buttons_20_3.png") -20px 0px no-repeat !important; color: blue; display: inline-block; height: 20px; margin-left: -1px; overflow: hidden; position: relative; text-decoration-line: none; width: 20px;" target="_blank" title="BlogThis!"><span class="share-button-link-text" style="display: block; text-indent: -9999px;">BlogThis!</span></a><a class="goog-inline-block share-button sb-twitter" href="https://draft.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogID=3674754427241227157&postID=4900526021369131782&target=twitter" style="background: url("/img/share_buttons_20_3.png") -40px 0px no-repeat !important; color: blue; display: inline-block; height: 20px; margin-left: -1px; overflow: hidden; position: relative; text-decoration-line: none; width: 20px;" target="_blank" title="Share to Twitter"><span class="share-button-link-text" style="display: block; text-indent: -9999px;">Share to Twitter</span></a><a class="goog-inline-block share-button sb-facebook" href="https://draft.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogID=3674754427241227157&postID=4900526021369131782&target=facebook" style="background: url("/img/share_buttons_20_3.png") -60px 0px no-repeat !important; color: blue; display: inline-block; height: 20px; margin-left: -1px; overflow: hidden; position: relative; text-decoration-line: none; width: 20px;" target="_blank" title="Share to Facebook"><span class="share-button-link-text" style="display: block; text-indent: -9999px;">Share to Facebook</span></a><a class="goog-inline-block share-button sb-pinterest" href="https://draft.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogID=3674754427241227157&postID=4900526021369131782&target=pinterest" style="background: url("/img/share_buttons_20_3.png") -100px 0px no-repeat !important; color: blue; display: inline-block; height: 20px; margin-left: -1px; overflow: hidden; position: relative; text-decoration-line: none; width: 20px;" target="_blank" title="Share to Pinterest"><span class="share-button-link-text" style="display: block; text-indent: -9999px;">Share to Pinterest</span></a></div></div><div class="post-footer-line post-footer-line-2"><span class="post-labels" style="margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;"></span></div><div class="post-footer-line post-footer-line-3"><span class="post-location" style="margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;"></span></div></div></div></div><div class="post-outer" style="background-color: white; border-top: 1px solid rgb(255, 255, 0); font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; margin: 0px -15px; padding: 15px 15px 10px;"><div class="post hentry uncustomized-post-template" itemprop="blogPost" itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://schema.org/BlogPosting" style="min-height: 0px; position: relative;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><a name="1455143231540341917"></a></span><h3 class="post-title entry-title" itemprop="name" style="font-size: 22px; font-stretch: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; position: relative;"><a href="http://randazzalegalgroupsucks.blogspot.com/2021/02/of-course-google-is-in-on-it-i-reported.html" style="color: black; font-stretch: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; line-height: normal; text-decoration-line: none;">OF COURSE GOOGLE IS IN ON IT. I REPORTED ON THIS AND SUED ON ALL THIS YEARS AGO. CORRUPT COURTS IN MARITIME LAW, THEIR REIGN IS COMING TO AN END</a></h3><div class="post-header" style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px 0px 1em;"><div class="post-header-line-1"></div></div><div class="post-body entry-content" id="post-body-1455143231540341917" itemprop="description articleBody" style="line-height: 1.4; position: relative; width: 786px;"><p style="font-size: 13px;"> <span style="font-size: x-large;"> "</span></p><h2 style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-weight: 500; line-height: 1.35; margin: 0.83em 0px 0.5em; padding: 0px; position: relative; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Why Google Permits Pissedconsumer To Hide Bad Reviews For Money? Is Google Part of Possible EXTORTION?</span></h2><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">PISSEDCONSUMER Denied section 230 immunity and can’t shake extortion claim Asking $10-60,000 per year to hide information from Google accused of EXTORTION of small businesses by Michael Podolsky from consumer Opinion – Why Google permits this conduct?</span></p><div class="wp-block-image" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1em; padding: 0px; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline;"><figure class="aligncenter size-large" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; clear: both; display: table; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 5px auto 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-align: center; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;"><img alt="PISSEDCONSUMER Denied section 230 immunity and can't shake extortion claim Asking $10-60,000 per year to hide information from Google accused of EXTORTION of small businesses by Michael Podolsky from consumer Opinion - Why Google permits" class="wp-image-507" data-pin-no-hover="true" height="576" loading="lazy" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" src="https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Denied-section-230-immunity-1024x576.png" srcset="https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Denied-section-230-immunity-1024x576.png 1024w, https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Denied-section-230-immunity-300x169.png 300w, https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Denied-section-230-immunity-768x432.png 768w, https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Denied-section-230-immunity-1536x864.png 1536w, https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Denied-section-230-immunity-750x422.png 750w, https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Denied-section-230-immunity-1140x641.png 1140w, https://www.smye-holland.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PISSEDCONSUMER-Denied-section-230-immunity.png 1920w" style="background: transparent; border-radius: 0px; border: 0px; box-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2) 0px 0px 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; height: auto; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; max-width: 100%; padding: 0px; vertical-align: middle;" width="1024" /></span><figcaption style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; caption-side: bottom; color: #a0a0a0; display: table-caption; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0.5em 0px 1em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">PISSEDCONSUMER Denied section 230 immunity and can’t shake extortion claim Asking $10-60,000 per year to hide information from Google accused of EXTORTION of small businesses by Michael Podolsky from consumer Opinion – Why Google permits</span></figcaption></figure></div><pre class="wp-block-preformatted" style="background: rgb(250, 250, 250); border: 1px solid rgb(238, 238, 238); box-sizing: border-box; color: #7b7b7b; font-family: "Lucida Console", Monaco, monospace; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin-bottom: 1.75em; margin-top: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0.5em 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><span style="font-size: large;">*This is an opinion, impression article presenting a point of view to be considered and there are other opinions regarding the individuals and entities mentioned in this article. You may search other information and find other opinions.*</span></pre><h2 style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-weight: 500; line-height: 1.35; margin: 0.83em 0px 0.5em; padding: 0px; position: relative; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">Additional Resources Curated (not verified for truthfulness)</span></h2><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://www.bbb.org/us/nv/las-vegas/profile/internet-service/consumer-opinion-llc-1086-90052400/complaints" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">https://www.bbb.org/us/nv/las-vegas/profile/internet-service/consumer-opinion-llc-1086-90052400/complaints</span></a></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://unmasked-michael-podolsky.blogspot.com/2019/11/webactivismcom-owner-michael-podolsky.html" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">https://unmasked-michael-podolsky.blogspot.com/2019/11/webactivismcom-owner-michael-podolsky.html</span></a></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://www.complaintsboard.com/vladimir-soyfer-and-fairfax-smiles-fake-negative-reviews-by-webactivismcom-owner-michael-podolsky-c1072884" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">https://www.complaintsboard.com/vladimir-soyfer-and-fairfax-smiles-fake-negative-reviews-by-webactivismcom-owner-michael-podolsky-c1072884</span></a></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.pissedconsumer.com" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.pissedconsumer.com</span></a></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://www.sitejabber.com/reviews/pissedconsumer.com" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">https://www.sitejabber.com/reviews/pissedconsumer.com</span></a></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-09-24-Ascentive%20Complaint.pdf" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-09-24-Ascentive%20Complaint.pdf</span></a></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://marketingland.com/increase-extortion-fueled-reputation-attacks-points-need-legal-change-228898" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">https://marketingland.com/increase-extortion-fueled-reputation-attacks-points-need-legal-change-228898</span></a></p><p style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: "PT Serif", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25em; padding: 0px; text-rendering: optimizelegibility; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://www.reviews.io/company-reviews/store/www-pissedconsumer-com" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">https://www.reviews.io/company-reviews/store/www-pissedconsumer-com</span></a></p><figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-wp-embed is-provider-cheater-board wp-block-embed-cheater-board" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;"><iframe class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="vzGt5BMf5d" frameborder="0" height="355" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" sandbox="allow-scripts" scrolling="no" security="restricted" src="https://www.cheaterboard.com/sex-predator-and-convicted-pedophile-michael-podolsky-aka-mikhail-podolsky-is-the-owner-of-webactivism-com-removal-ny/embed/#?secret=vzGt5BMf5d" style="border-style: initial; border-width: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; max-width: 100%; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" title="“Sex Predator and Convicted Pedophile Michael Podolsky aka Mikhail Podolsky is the owner of WebActivism.com Removal NY” — Cheater Board" width="600"></iframe></span></div></figure><figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-wp-embed is-provider-technology-amp-marketing-law-blog wp-block-embed-technology-amp-marketing-law-blog" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; position: relative; vertical-align: baseline;"><blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="WZszGOwspV" style="border-color: rgb(238, 238, 238); border-image: initial; border-style: solid; border-width: 0px 0px 0px 4px; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: italic; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: bold; line-height: 1.5em; margin: 1em 1.25em; padding: 0px 0px 0px 1em; quotes: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2012/06/pissedconsumer.htm" style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #212121; font-family: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-size: large;">PissedConsumer Denied Section 230 Immunity and Can’t Shake Extortion Claim—Vo v. Opinion Corp.</span></a></blockquote></div></figure><p style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></p><p style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-size: large;">Source</span></p><p style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="color: blue; font-size: large; text-decoration-line: none;"><a href="https://www.smye-holland.com/2021/02/13/randazza-represents-pissedconsumer-a-company-with-russian-ties-accused-of-extorting-small-businesses/" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">https://www.smye-holland.com/2021/02/13/randazza-represents-pissedconsumer-a-company-with-russian-ties-accused-of-extorting-small-businesses/</a></span></p><p style="font-size: 13px;"><br /></p><p style="text-align: center;"><b><span style="font-size: x-large;">MORE AT LINK BELOW</span></b></p><p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://randazzalegalgroupsucks.blogspot.com/" target="_blank"><b><span style="font-size: x-large;">http://randazzalegalgroupsucks.blogspot.com/</span></b></a><br /></p><p style="font-size: 13px;"><br /></p><p style="font-size: 13px;"><br /></p></div></div></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-56831512329852422552018-02-23T04:33:00.001-08:002018-02-23T04:33:21.574-08:00Pedophile Rights Porn lawyer, White Supremacy Rights Lawyers of Randazza Legal Group. Supported by Las Vegas Attorney Matt Zirzow, Zacharia Larson and Shara Larson.<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Virgin auction promoter & PIMP Dennis Hof hires pedophile rights porn lawyer of Randazza Legal Group. Nevada Brothel Owner Dennis Hof.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><iframe allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/mG5mTHbYsgY" style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" width="560"></iframe><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<b>Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group.</b></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-92034534741481378132018-02-23T04:32:00.001-08:002018-02-23T04:32:34.214-08:00Isn't Cambodia where all the Porn Guys go to hide? Did Marc Randazza aid and abett this guy? Where is Matt Zirzow and Zacharia Larson in all this? Besides protecting the EVILS of Marc Randazza?<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">"Anglin’s lawyer Marc Randazza claims Anglin can’t face the lawsuit because he does not belong to any U.S. state. Randazza said Anglin fears for his physical safety if his address was revealed, even if it’s in court documents and not in a blog post, like Anglin did to Gersh."</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Source and Full Story</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/neo-nazi-andrew-anglin-must-come-out-of-hiding-judge-rules-anglins-lawyer-says-he-lives-in-cambodia-now" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">https://www.thedailybeast.com/neo-nazi-andrew-anglin-must-come-out-of-hiding-judge-rules-anglins-lawyer-says-he-lives-in-cambodia-now</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-84355473681889917902017-12-20T08:30:00.001-08:002017-12-20T08:30:29.797-08:00Jason M. Feldman seems to be a part of Marc J. Randazza's Gang Stalking Attorney Group. Attorneys who Abuse the Court Process and enable each other to Drive Woman to Suicide, Threaten and Harass women and not just a "regular" gang of thugs but actual attorneys who network with the courts to DESTROY the lives of woman who don't do what they want. And Marc J. Randazza First Amendment Attorney comes to their Rescue.<a href="https://marcrandazzabankruptcy.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Marc J. Randazza</a> and Ronald Green of <a href="https://marcrandazzabankruptcy.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Randazza Legal Group</a>, along with Jennifer Brochey Randazza enable attorneys such as the one below, and protect them in court to harass these women to an extreme. Marc Randazza also supports and defends Pedophiles.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj3zYP9QCOsmLBxvPd2whaF_qvIKjcw1Ar-KPyPyyAGevWmz6TySDn4OiRDPoUvXo7OdedSkkTa0lXU3FX_m6FiPvpO21h7US5SGVSEHsqHs0CgciW7NLHp29Mv7eov8alXoGiKJwcVgC4r/s1600/Blogger+Crystal+Cox+-+Invesetigative+Blogger.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="722" data-original-width="652" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj3zYP9QCOsmLBxvPd2whaF_qvIKjcw1Ar-KPyPyyAGevWmz6TySDn4OiRDPoUvXo7OdedSkkTa0lXU3FX_m6FiPvpO21h7US5SGVSEHsqHs0CgciW7NLHp29Mv7eov8alXoGiKJwcVgC4r/s200/Blogger+Crystal+Cox+-+Invesetigative+Blogger.jpg" width="180" /></a><a href="http://mattzirzowreport.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Matt Zirzow</a> and <a href="http://mattzirzowreport.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Zacharia Larson</a>, <a href="http://mattzirzowreport.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Shara Larson</a>, of <a href="http://mattzirzowreport.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Zirzow and Larson</a> DEFEND Marc J. Randazza's actions and protect him. <a href="https://www.facebook.com/groups/848931325284868/" target="_blank">Matt Zirzow</a> is <a href="https://www.facebook.com/groups/1150901458375306/" target="_blank">Marc Randazza's Bankruptcy</a> attorney and is enabling Marc Randazza to cover up years of speech chilling, anti-first amendment harassment. Attorneys Protecting Attorneys to RUIN the Lives of Women, to Prey on Woman, to Assault Woman is NOT a Free Speech Right or Issue.<br /><br />
Do the right thing and End your Life, suggestions that the woman should End their lives, the Gang Stalking Attorneys, do this in mass. I, investigative blogger Crystal Cox and investigative blogger Alexandra Mayers have told the courts, the authorities for years, they Continue to Protect Marc Randazza and attorneys like him.<br />
<br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;">THIS IS NOT OK. </span><span style="color: blue;">The Courts are Enabling These Attorneys to do this to woman who speak up, to woman who vote the way they don't want, to woman who stand up to them or up for themselves in any way. </span><span style="font-size: large;">THIS IS NOT OK. </span></b><br />
<br />
You CANNOT just SHRUG off these eMails, as these attorneys come at you from every direction and Ruin your Life. <a href="https://www.facebook.com/groups/1150901458375306/" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a>, First Amendment Attorney is Flat out WRONG about Jason M. Feldman and attorneys like him. The eMail is Sexual Assault, it is extreme harassment and I consider it a death threat and many women do kill themselves over what these gang of protected abusive men do to them, and they are attorneys, officers of the court. They are believed over the women.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZ16YZ5K2APf5ZDpy7L3-XjrZe4cJ04HlsF6ka4ctX6NB7SILGwzMuv5Ys-yH-e9Y6X2Dlb-TfuXXte6UpqA2t0Xn0LvLziFDmvVXfcfWXEwMPoBtYFSJ1xxZOSH_u2ddwAdCa7bLUGbGK/s1600/covert-harassment-logo-h175xw660-e1412773519847.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="174" data-original-width="313" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgZ16YZ5K2APf5ZDpy7L3-XjrZe4cJ04HlsF6ka4ctX6NB7SILGwzMuv5Ys-yH-e9Y6X2Dlb-TfuXXte6UpqA2t0Xn0LvLziFDmvVXfcfWXEwMPoBtYFSJ1xxZOSH_u2ddwAdCa7bLUGbGK/s1600/covert-harassment-logo-h175xw660-e1412773519847.png" /></a></div>
" Jason M. Feldman<br />
<br />
After the vote, the female councilmembers received a bevy of negative and gender-related comments including an email signed “Warms Regards, Jason M. Feldman, Esq.” sent to all five of councilmembers Tuesday.<br />
<br />
<span style="color: blue;">“As women, I understand that you spend a lot of your time trying to please others (mostly on your knees) but I can only hope that you each find ways <b>to quickly and painfully end yourselves</b>,” the email said. “Each of you should rot in hell for what you took from me yesterday.”</span><br />
<br />
"The email – titled <b>"Dishonorable Women of the Council"</b> – went on to suggest the female councilmembers were "whoring" themselves out to the highest bidder and that <b>they should "do the honorable thing and end yourselves."</b><br />
<br />
The Puget Sound Business Journal contacted Feldman, who referred us to an attorney for comment. Marc J. Randazza taught is Feldman’s First Amendment attorney and former professor at the <b>Barry University School of Law in Orlando.</b><br />
<br />
“Jason has <b><span style="color: blue;">a colorful manner </span></b>of communication,” he said. “I myself received emails like this from him while I was his professor, I did what an adult would do – shrugged it off. That's part of being a politician in America."<br />
<br />
Ben Livingston – a Seattle marijuana advocate and real estate broker who specializes in pot shops – filed the most recent complaint against Feldman Tuesday, as first reported by Seattle news blogger Erica C. Barnett.<br />
<br />
<b>“This level of hatred and misogyny has no place in our public discourse,” </b>Livingston said in an interview Wednesday. “I can’t allow that. The female councilmembers who receive this horrible litany of hate mail may not have the ability to respond, but other people can. People who go to that level of hatred need to be on warning – <b><span style="color: #990000; font-size: large;">it’s not OK. People will stand up, even if the person you are attacking may not be able to.”</span></b><br />
<br />
A spokeswoman from the Washington Bar Association said the organization does not comment on specific complaints until they are reviewed. Most of the bar's professional conduct rules concern interactions with clients, but "provides that it is misconduct for a lawyer to engage in conduct demonstrating unfitness to practice law."<br />
<br />
The bar's suspension recommendation in the previous case included details about Feldman's alleged relationship with his client."<br />
<br />
Source<br />
<a href="https://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2016/05/04/attorney-who-allegedly-sent-sexist-email-to.html" target="_blank">https://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2016/05/04/attorney-who-allegedly-sent-sexist-email-to.html</a><br />
<br />
Just Because you are a Politician Does not GIVE attorneys such as Marc Randazza or Jason Feldman the right to push you to suicide, and assault you, scary you, threaten you, harass you.<br />
<br />
<b>STOP MARC RANDAZZA AND THE ATTORNEYS WHO ENABLE HIM TO ENABLE OTHER ATTORNEYS TO SEXUAL AND VERBALLY ASSAULT WOMEN </b><br />
<b>THEY DON'T LIKE.</b><br />
<br />
Tip on Anything on this Post? eMail me at<br />
<b><span style="color: blue;">ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com </span></b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>The First Amendment is NOT about Private eMails. </b><br />
<br />
It is about Public Speech right? eMailing someone and pushing them to kill themselves has seen convictions right? I mean some people do kill themselves from this pressure by gang stalking attorneys such as Marc J. Randazza who represents attorney Jason M. Feldman. A direct eMail is NOT really a Free Speech thing is it? It's more of a Death Threat, of Harassment, of Assault, isn't it?<br />
<b><br /></b>
"An email signed <b><span style="color: blue;">"Jason M. Feldman, Esq."</span></b> and sent to the five women on the council repeatedly urged the council members to "end" themselves. It read, in part: "As women, I understand that you spend a lot of your time trying to please others (mostly on your knees) but I can only hope that you each find ways to quickly and painfully end yourselves." In response, local cannabis activist (and former Stranger contributor) Ben Livingston filed a complaint with the Washington State Bar Association against local lawyer Jason M. Feldman.<br />
<br />
I reached Feldman by phone this morning. He refused to confirm that he sent the email and refused to comment except to remind me that <span style="color: #990000;"><b>the First Amendment exists. "I want you to make sure that you understand the level of scrutiny that is afforded political speech under the First Amendment," he said, refusing to comment further."</b></span><br />
<br />
"Marc J. Randazza, a lawyer who once taught Feldman, doubled down in defending Feldman's unhinged behavior to the Business Journal. “Jason has a colorful manner of communication,” Randazza told Business Journal. “I myself received emails like this from him while I was his professor, I did what an adult would do—shrugged it off. That's part of being a politician in America."<br />
<br />
Livingston, who filed the complaint, said he was offended by the misogyny and references to suicide in Feldman's email. "That level of misogyny and hatred has no place in our public discourse," Livingston said. "I was surprised he was a state-licensed attorney. He has a legal obligation to uphold certain ethical standards and he should know better."<br />
<br />
Livingston added that it's important to "stand up" for council members who may not have the time to respond to hateful emails. In that same spirit, the National Women's Political Caucus is circulating a petition of solidarity with the council members. You can sign that here.<br />
<br />
City council member Kshama Sawant's office declined to comment on all this, and Lorena González told me she's not commenting until she and her colleagues consider a "formal response." Council Members Sally Bagshaw and Debora Juarez did not reply to requests for comment.<br />
<br />
In an interview, Council Member Lisa Herbold sounded deliberately cheerful. Herbold, a longtime city hall staffer who's new to the council, said she's never dealt with this kind of backlash "from a gender perspective" before. Of about 300 emails she received since Monday, Herbold says eight of them were "out of line," ranging from calling council members "ladies" to Feldman's. But she said she's also avoiding Twitter and most of Facebook.<br />
<br />
"I'm not excusing the behavior," Herbold said. "I'm not saying it should be expected. But... I don't think the response we've heard is reflective of men, of sports fans, of NBA fans. In any group of people you're going to find a couple of people who cross the line."<br />
<br />
Chris Hansen, the entrepreneur who wants to build the arena, called the misogynistic response <b>"unacceptable."</b> Council Member Rob Johnson and Mayor Ed Murray, who both supported the street vacation, have expressed "disappointment" at the public reaction.<br />
<br />
At an unrelated press conference this morning, Murray—awkwardly, speaking on behalf of the women of the council as one of them, Herbold, stood right behind him—said <b><span style="color: blue;">"this must stop" and "Seattle is better than this."</span></b><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhyNo9XDtrTdt5zHVVAqjUIS_09kuMwYFyNhkHcSFF4kC8A0og-y3WmnZsZC2seFstuk4IsIL7gSRnQ4YN4gKdgBuexYjVb3lygVTUvmPdazKDRY8ZOAnvI-YIXQwG_qoRC1DlkiVCeZHqN/s1600/images+%25281%2529.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="190" data-original-width="266" height="142" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhyNo9XDtrTdt5zHVVAqjUIS_09kuMwYFyNhkHcSFF4kC8A0og-y3WmnZsZC2seFstuk4IsIL7gSRnQ4YN4gKdgBuexYjVb3lygVTUvmPdazKDRY8ZOAnvI-YIXQwG_qoRC1DlkiVCeZHqN/s200/images+%25281%2529.png" width="200" /></a>But online, nowhere is really "better" than anywhere else. As Seattlish has pointed out, local reporters who presented Monday's results as men vs. women helped stoke this reaction. And, even without that unhelpful framing, the internet is notoriously hostile to women, no matter your zip code. Data from Pew Research shows that while internet users of all genders experience harassment, women are more likely to be <b>stalked or sexually harassed</b>. That can often be most severe for women who work in public, like politicians or journalists."<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>More Research on the Above Case</b><br />
<b><a href="https://www.thestranger.com/slog/2016/05/04/24045749/lawyer-who-allegedly-told-city-council-members-to-end-themselves-already-facing-possible-bar-suspension" target="_blank">https://www.thestranger.com/slog/2016/05/04/24045749/lawyer-who-allegedly-told-city-council-members-to-end-themselves-already-facing-possible-bar-suspension</a></b><br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: #990000; font-size: large;">The Jason Feldman eMails are NOTHING to do with the First Amendment nor are they "political" speech. They are pure hate, assault, threats, bullying, intimidation. </span></b><br />
<br />
Decision on Jason M. Feldman Washington State Bar Complaint<br />
<a href="https://www.thestranger.com/images/blogimages/2016/05/04/1462410523-feldmanfindingsoffact.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.thestranger.com/images/blogimages/2016/05/04/1462410523-feldmanfindingsoffact.pdf</a><br />
<br />
Emailing Someone Direct Hate, malicious derogatory messages, encouraging they kill themselves,and sexually assaulting them with words, DIRECTLY, is NOT a Free Speech Right, it is a Direct Threat. <b><span style="color: blue;">Direct Harassment and is NOT a First Amendment Issue.</span></b> And they are Public Officials. The eMail was not opinion regarding their vote in this matter, it was pure hate, assault. Marc Randazza constantly defends EVIL Lawyers such as Jason M. Feldman of Washington State.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjvVyaVjPU0oTag6dAoxrOqCaLqR9vWUO0XkWHpX4rj2ga02gFo0EwQYBSlMsSJHuoXImKBKYPt6JoXxdrY0IR96s6BWB2Yx5qjynnsu8u5YUYZFWtQTCeqEt66g-w_oq9YIs8Dsr-orB5E/s1600/First+Amendment+Protection+-+Copy+-+Copy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="358" data-original-width="490" height="145" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjvVyaVjPU0oTag6dAoxrOqCaLqR9vWUO0XkWHpX4rj2ga02gFo0EwQYBSlMsSJHuoXImKBKYPt6JoXxdrY0IR96s6BWB2Yx5qjynnsu8u5YUYZFWtQTCeqEt66g-w_oq9YIs8Dsr-orB5E/s200/First+Amendment+Protection+-+Copy+-+Copy.jpg" width="200" /></a>Oh and Don't Forget the Hypocritical Irony of <a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Marc J. Randazza</a>, Free Speech attorney, the disturbing, and I say criminal speech of guys like Jason Feldman, Marc Randazza PROTECTS, stands up for. Yet I, Crystal Cox speak Critical of Him and he and wife Jennifer Randazza sues me.<br />
<br />
Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers speaks critical of him he and his wife Jennifer Brochey Randazza sue her. Own a blog name Marc Randazza don't like and his entire family sues ya, like they did <a href="http://eliotbernstein.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">iViewit inventor Eliot Bernstein</a> and me, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox.<br />
<b><span style="color: blue;"><br /></span></b>
<b><span style="color: blue;">Marc Randazza DOES NOT SHRUG it OFF. </span></b>He sues, and uses that lawsuit for endless amounts of years to take down online content in mass that speaks critical of him, he uses the legal case to defame, harass, attack and destroy those who stand up to him. He uses the case to subpoena your banks, phone company, friends, family, clients, colleagues and dig into your life as far as he can and DESTROY as much as he can.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Marc Randazza certainly does not act like the </span></b></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">proverbial Adult he speaks of and "shrug it off".<br /></span></b></div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiV0EXJbKkTRastcM5Z3JdmhgTImCtAydGL8-tQIOt_RLFM6QisbWSPPagVqI4n-Qsn6TlClmuKCUxCl2on8Q_tO0-aJPWaar2pt_AIjIDqhIVSavoYZm_5b4johvsWOVuj9LJK2g5ATFMo/s1600/Crystal+Cox+Marc+Randazza.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="390" data-original-width="600" height="208" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiV0EXJbKkTRastcM5Z3JdmhgTImCtAydGL8-tQIOt_RLFM6QisbWSPPagVqI4n-Qsn6TlClmuKCUxCl2on8Q_tO0-aJPWaar2pt_AIjIDqhIVSavoYZm_5b4johvsWOVuj9LJK2g5ATFMo/s320/Crystal+Cox+Marc+Randazza.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="font-size: 12.8px; text-align: center;"><b>Blogger Crystal Cox DEDICATED to Exposing Marc Randazza</b></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
For More on the Worlds MOST HYPOCRITICAL <a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">First Amendment, Free Speech Attorney Marc J. Randazza </a>and wife <a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Jennifer Brochey Randazza</a>.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://UnethicalScumAttorney.blogspot.com</a><br />
<br />
And to Follow <a href="https://marcrandazzabankruptcy.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Marc Randazza's Bankruptcy</a><br />
<a href="https://marcrandazzabankruptcy.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">https://MarcRandazzaBankruptcy.blogspot.com</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-11236617305468884312017-11-09T14:32:00.001-08:002017-11-09T14:32:54.106-08:00The tactics of the Gang Stalking attorneys who work with Marc Randazza and I allege some judges in the past are just as evil as what we are hearing about Harvey Weinstein and worse. Many of these targeted whistleblowers are harassed and shamed into suicide. Marc Randazza is NOT above the law nor is ANY attorney, Godaddy insider, Google insider, Court Clerk, or ANYONE else who helped Randazza to silence Victims.<b>Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group and their conspirators are CONSTANTLY active in suppressing Journalism. They use their power and position as officers of the court to intimidate, threaten, bully, and shut down those who expose the Porn Industry secrets, expose human trafficking, EXPOSE predators, and EXPOSE the attorneys who protect them. </b><br />
<br />
Marc Randazza, Ron Green and Randazza Legal Group sidesteps the First Amendment and use any intimidation tactic available. Your hearing now of how Harvey Weinstein got a gang of investigators, lawyers, spies and more to silence and intimidate women. Randazza and his co-conspirators, I allege, do the same tactics to SILENCE journalists which is what investigative bloggers are. The BIG difference is they are OFFICERS OF THE COURT.<br />
<br />
Randazza succeeds in removing mass content, getting huge judgments, getting bank records and phone records, alienating people by threatening to sue anyone who is connected to them or works with them and drives them into financial ruin, constant never ending fear and stress, and after years of that Randazza Legal Group WILL file in a court of law<b><span style="color: blue;"> to make their VICTIM, their TARGET pay for their legal fees for attacking, harassing, tormenting, suing, defaming and ruining the Targets life. </span></b><br />
<br />
Just as the Weinstein case, we see large amounts of victims come out and tell the courts what officers of the court Randazza Legal Group and ALL connected attorneys are doing. And the courts have thus far protected these guys.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitIIQMgX-5R6ug9DPr_ptFD3k7MFV1JdMtF6SwD_cpCOPJX8N8_HWriI2dimMgO_-UZMdOiThjZNRbXDwrMNdZVgw22swZBkxuIJ0l92kadP_8sxLtmmAHbbHHWVmjlATykUyVYjFtdBw/s1600/images+%25281%2529.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="190" data-original-width="266" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitIIQMgX-5R6ug9DPr_ptFD3k7MFV1JdMtF6SwD_cpCOPJX8N8_HWriI2dimMgO_-UZMdOiThjZNRbXDwrMNdZVgw22swZBkxuIJ0l92kadP_8sxLtmmAHbbHHWVmjlATykUyVYjFtdBw/s1600/images+%25281%2529.png" /></a><br />
They actual file lawsuits against each others targets, they blog the conspired narrative in mass among many "credible" officers of the court aKa attorneys. These malicious "opinions" on blogs by officers of the court are not only deemed credible and true but they are used as actual EXHIBITS in a Court of Law as Unadjudicated yet VERY EFFECTIVE evidence against their target.<br />
<br />
<b>These Gang stalking Attorneys are believed over and over as their target is NOT believed, ruled against and their life is ruined. </b><br />
<br />
Check Out <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20110303101527/http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/" target="_blank">Jennifer Randazza</a> and Marc Randazza suing me, Crystal Cox to shut down massive online content, steal domain names and redirect them to their commercial site, bully me, harass and threaten me. Read it all and learn how these attorneys do this.<br />
<br />
Also research J. Devoy cases and cases that involve Judge Navarro and many unconstitutional TRO's. There are many cases out there where these guys sue a target, get the precedence they want, shut down content (Chill Speech) and get a Judgment in their favor to pay them HUGE legal fees for their fraud on the court, torturous interference, bullying, lying, threatening, <b>HORRIFIC RETALITION</b>.<br />
<b><span style="color: blue;"><br /></span></b><b><span style="color: blue;">Randazza v. Cox Docket</span></b><br />
<a href="http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" target="_blank">http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html</a><br />
<br />
THESE GANG STALKING ATTORNEYS threaten, sue, bully, intimidate, stalk, blog hate in mass, drive by victims homes, publish victims home address, and have a constant campaign to keep them quiet WHATEVER IT TAKES.<br />
<br />
Alexandra Mayers was sued by Jennifer Randazza, the wife of First Amendment PORN attorney Marc Randazza. Jennifer Randazza claimed Alexandra Mayers Defamed her "per se" and painted her in False Light. This is SERIOUSLY Laughable, a Parody, a Joke. Oh wait its a REALLY BIG DEAL. As this EVIL woman, Jennifer Randazza seems to have convinced a seemingly rogue and corrupt court to actual rule in her favor. I wonder that that cost??? "per se"<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLP1F3Vkye-LJMSHN6RohrVM9Awtwr2T77eYaSgZlCk4cuuCpQ-406dsR2c12SatvN6g3NiW61ns6QXko8NBwicNnUEXa8pRiplCi1gCjEHzY6XtfhNW2s13zNDg2zSoroppWbvAnzDTU/s1600/AAEAAQAAAAAAAAbcAAAAJGJiZTExMDg5LTQwNWItNGY1Zi04MmQ2LTk5ZGY1MzVkZWRlYQ.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="200" data-original-width="200" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLP1F3Vkye-LJMSHN6RohrVM9Awtwr2T77eYaSgZlCk4cuuCpQ-406dsR2c12SatvN6g3NiW61ns6QXko8NBwicNnUEXa8pRiplCi1gCjEHzY6XtfhNW2s13zNDg2zSoroppWbvAnzDTU/s200/AAEAAQAAAAAAAAbcAAAAJGJiZTExMDg5LTQwNWItNGY1Zi04MmQ2LTk5ZGY1MzVkZWRlYQ.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
J. Malcom DeVoy and Ronald Green of Randazza Legal Group represented Jennifer Randazza in this malicious UNCONSTITUTIONAL, Unlawful Lawsuit to silence and intimidate a journalist.<br />
<br />
Alexandra Mayers / Monica Foster <span style="color: blue;"><b>NEVER had an "unhealthy obsession" with Jennifer Randazza.</b></span> Instead Alexandra Mayers dedicated her life to doing the right thing and reporting on the REAL "bad guys" such as Jennifer Randazza's husband and the thugs at his law firm Randazza Legal Group who were causing real harm to people.<br />
<br />
Alexandra Mayers was reporting on them, exposing them and making fun of them as his her First Amendment Protected right. Jennifer Randazza is the one who had the<b> VERY "unhealthy" obsession with Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers</b> . Why not ignore the name calling? I allege that Jennifer Randazza sued Alexandra Mayers as a PROXY for her husband and his gang stalking co-conspirators to suppress Alexandra Mayers speech, steal blogs and other intellectual property, and to intimidate and bully Alexandra Mayers .<br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: blue;">Marc Randazza has a SERIOUS "unhealthy obsession" </span></b>with any woman who DARES to make fun of him, <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20110303101527/http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/" target="_blank">call his wife a slut</a>, expose his illegal behavior, report on porn industry criminal allegations and unethical behavior and most of all WOMEN WHO DARE TO STAND UP TO HIM.<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj8NQJ0aGGTTNjEOzfna-srBSCWcpRPybF1ATyBOAqThiGC1OhicZG2-RYzFhiXThKRfoAIUT86YBSF16IQyaUEgGt9KQIDDwXVBhfV89VNSGawdCvIUeXcha5a0cUCgk3PM58Ymw4pp5U/s1600/Butthurt-When-popular-culture-and-political-correctness-are-synonymous.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" data-original-height="933" data-original-width="1400" height="426" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj8NQJ0aGGTTNjEOzfna-srBSCWcpRPybF1ATyBOAqThiGC1OhicZG2-RYzFhiXThKRfoAIUT86YBSF16IQyaUEgGt9KQIDDwXVBhfV89VNSGawdCvIUeXcha5a0cUCgk3PM58Ymw4pp5U/s640/Butthurt-When-popular-culture-and-political-correctness-are-synonymous.jpg" width="640" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="font-size: 12.8px;">When Jennifer Randazza Gets BUTTHURT she sues the Women who Stood up to her THUG of a Hubby</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Check Out <b><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MEASOxyMqeDK5KqTF8OhDScygbBi_PUe/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">A-14-699072-C | Jennifer Randazza, Plaintiff(s) vs. Alexandra Mayers</a></b>, Defendant AND see how to SHUT down the TRUTH and use the Judicial Process for REVENGE against someone who called you a slut and made "parody" of your high profile life that has NO RIGHT to Privacy as suggested in their legal cases as a matter of law. See the link below for Federal Judge SHUT down of these allegations.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="color: #990000;"><b>Yet somehow the Nevada State court went along with Jennifer Randazza???</b></span></div>
<br />
Was <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MEASOxyMqeDK5KqTF8OhDScygbBi_PUe/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">Jennifer Randazza</a> connected to Organized Crime or Pornography? Ummm geee Duh, all you have to do is look at Marc Randazza's blogs, or pool parties with predators they took their kids to as seen in<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiMV9xcl9qeVdpSUU/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank"> this Arbitration</a>.<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiMV9xcl9qeVdpSUU/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiMV9xcl9qeVdpSUU/view?usp=sharing</a><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNuDzvnxvZ8u2pP7doEKBa63un9oVp2ltHU76d6KOQ4FoF2Ngz4HD9-vImALhjM8PBEVpr0eyUe51K_EX6-ITMAh4DRaIjexQkoqXqBeI2IVAjvQmoo9FKeBjt6cldwClF_xHis7xsS94/s1600/images+%25282%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="188" data-original-width="268" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNuDzvnxvZ8u2pP7doEKBa63un9oVp2ltHU76d6KOQ4FoF2Ngz4HD9-vImALhjM8PBEVpr0eyUe51K_EX6-ITMAh4DRaIjexQkoqXqBeI2IVAjvQmoo9FKeBjt6cldwClF_xHis7xsS94/s1600/images+%25282%2529.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
Jennifer Randazza and Marc Randazza I ALLEGE have Committed <b>SERIOUS "INTENTIONAL MISCONDUCT"</b> in Mass and have used the power of our legal system to do it.<br />
<br />
<b><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MEASOxyMqeDK5KqTF8OhDScygbBi_PUe/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">A-14-699072-C | Jennifer Randazza, Plaintiff(s) vs. Alexandra Mayers</a></b>, Clark County Nevada Rob Bare, Bonnie Bulla Case Docket Linked Below<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MEASOxyMqeDK5KqTF8OhDScygbBi_PUe/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MEASOxyMqeDK5KqTF8OhDScygbBi_PUe/view?usp=sharing</a><br />
<br />
How in the World did Clark County Courts let Jennifer Randazza get away with these knowingly false pleadings and I allege perjury? Well who knows? I do know the TRUTH has a tendency to comet out. SO one day that too will surface from <b>the "False Light" to the "True Light"</b>.<br />
<br />
We all thought that Jennifer Randazza contacted Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers and set up a meeting to discuss trying to get away from Marc Randazza. I FULLY believed that to be true, so did other followers of Monica's blogs. As someone claiming to be Jennifer Randazza contacted Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers, that really happened.<br />
<br />
Monica posted on her blog about the meeting, and yeah to Divorce Marc Randazza would be to leave #organisedcrime and #prostitution as that is the industry he works in as the RECORD everywhere CLEARLY shows. So to sue Jennifer Randazza contacted Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers<br />
<br />
Jennifer Randazza made false and SERIOUSLY HARMFUL statements about me Crystal Cox and did see in sworn to be true court filings. Flat out LIES, Defamation and False Light to a Federal Court about me, yet that's ok? Why? Because it is my life SHE ruined in suing me?<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhkNEchyA2ewd-4HK_RUsFz25lTp9OAtVMP_3ojn6sWSNVwsGLUO5o5mSV8H3-fwowpfnpLES8Uoh_HnPL6qTO_dG85MTl_I7QCqVo2bB9xt1_q8D47nnqdwCOdniJvQTV5HW3Pz9yPgDA/s1600/e4e751b9d492d0bbaaa8b81b0790a23b.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="407" data-original-width="564" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhkNEchyA2ewd-4HK_RUsFz25lTp9OAtVMP_3ojn6sWSNVwsGLUO5o5mSV8H3-fwowpfnpLES8Uoh_HnPL6qTO_dG85MTl_I7QCqVo2bB9xt1_q8D47nnqdwCOdniJvQTV5HW3Pz9yPgDA/s1600/e4e751b9d492d0bbaaa8b81b0790a23b.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
None of Jennifer Randazza's allegations are <a href="http://ia800304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf" target="_blank">"highly offensible"</a> to the "reasonable person" and even if poor baby <a href="http://ia800304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf" target="_blank">Jennifer Randazza</a> was offended SO WHAT. The Randazza's are the Face out there on the TV and in other mass media fighting for the right to OFFEND People.<br />
<br />
<span style="color: blue;"><b>Jennifer Randazza YOU DO NOT GET THE LUXURY OF BEING "OFFENDED" </b></span><br />
<br />
Again See The Court Order Below. Jennifer Randazza does not get to claim this shit, as a matter of LAW. Summary Judgement DENIAL in Randazza c. Cox. Jennifer Randazza is NOT above the Law.<br />
<a href="http://ia800304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf</a><br />
<br />
<br />
I allege that Jennifer Randazza perjured herself in this case and I hope to soon file criminal charges myself as Jennifer Randazza is a very dangerous woman, using the power of our judicial system and her officer of the court husband to SHUT DOWN women who call her out, tell the truth about her and her husband and make fun of Jennifer Randazza.<br />
<br />
Jennifer Randazza had such an Unhealthy Obsession with me, Crystal Cox, that she sued me for around 30 million and her husband and his law firm took my intellectual property in MASS to shut down my Speech about the RANDAZZAS.<br />
<br />
These Free Speech hating Jackasses simply removed my blogs about princess Jennifer Randazza. So we may never get to the bottom of this Slut thing or allegations of how Marc Randazza and Jennifer Randazza really met? Got a Tip? ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIR9S46eBuhS8vViFKYwVxLaPz2g0xnsdlmjVx8Ncr27LUvOwWLeeRDGhoaVJ5xXnpV2XiLmzxQdBKYN98AqcqqBQY2MyS9Btim1JeMVn6oj1JnqNIE0iuH7ZfGKsLXRsu_gkGH_JYyHo/s1600/images+%25281%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="152" data-original-width="332" height="183" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIR9S46eBuhS8vViFKYwVxLaPz2g0xnsdlmjVx8Ncr27LUvOwWLeeRDGhoaVJ5xXnpV2XiLmzxQdBKYN98AqcqqBQY2MyS9Btim1JeMVn6oj1JnqNIE0iuH7ZfGKsLXRsu_gkGH_JYyHo/s400/images+%25281%2529.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
We shall examine the Whole Is or Was <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20110303101527/http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/" target="_blank">Jennifer Randazza</a> a Slut thing<br />
<br />
Well Marc Randazza sure does describe what I allege is a SLUT, check it out<br />
"we had a particularly spirited drunken tryst that day. Yep, some great scuba diving, some great mojitos with some of my best friends, a little whisper of “lets go take a nap,” in my ear, and a new life begins."<br />
Source and Full Drunken Tryst<br />
<a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20110303101527/http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20110303101527/http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/</a><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9qXT-9gUyUR47M1NTBxsnWrinsljVYhZnZFVbgkyaZKBzdVTwt1QIraYdOL55Zh-dm5FTKQ8_456zrknrRffP9VVRujJiLJyt7XYHNm8xfzHJs2sz2W4p-IxZRnszUKp5Vsi43RMrUeE/s1600/Limbaugh+Slut+Cartoon.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="262" data-original-width="500" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9qXT-9gUyUR47M1NTBxsnWrinsljVYhZnZFVbgkyaZKBzdVTwt1QIraYdOL55Zh-dm5FTKQ8_456zrknrRffP9VVRujJiLJyt7XYHNm8xfzHJs2sz2W4p-IxZRnszUKp5Vsi43RMrUeE/s1600/Limbaugh+Slut+Cartoon.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
Oh and Check out Marc Randazza Defending Rush Limbaugh to call Sandra Fluke a SLUT, but We Dare not call Drunken Tryst get knocked up by a Porn Attorney clearly using no protection J<a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20110303101527/http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/22/the-most-amazing-news/" target="_blank">ennifer Brochey Randazza</a> a SLUT, how dare we<br />
<br />
Check this out<br />
<a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2014/12/marc-j-randazza-says-ms-mayers-got-sued.html" target="_blank">http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2014/12/marc-j-randazza-says-ms-mayers-got-sued.html</a><br />
<br />
Oh and this one, at 1;15 into it is a discussion where going after another guys wife is a First Amendment RIGHT but not for Crystal Cox or Alexandra Mayers, NOPE Sue Them.<br />
<br />
<b>Check it out</b><br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/J8_jVPjRtA0" width="560"></iframe><br />
<b><span style="color: blue;"><br /></span></b>
<b><span style="color: blue;">And don't forget Joseph Rakofsky</span></b><br />
<br />
<a href="http://josephrakofsky.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Joseph Rakofsky</a> explained in great detail what these guys were doing and that was years ago. Still our Courts let this behavior continued. I mean who is going to disbelieve a bunch of attorneys saying the same thing and even bloggging flat out lies about people that is then used by the other attorneys in court cases as UNADJUDICATED yet effective Evidence against their target.<br />
<br />
Joseph Rakofsky AGAIN told the courts exactly what these attorneys were doing and the Courts simply ignored the victims and chose the bad guy attorneys. Meanwhile the litigant/victim is discredited in mass by their gang of attorneys, forensic accountants, journalists and judges.<br />
<br />
Open Letter I wrote to Joseph Rakofsky<br />
<a href="http://proofofcorruption.blogspot.com/2013/02/open-letter-to-joseph-rakofsky-from.html">http://proofofcorruption.blogspot.com/2013/02/open-letter-to-joseph-rakofsky-from.html</a><br />
<br />
JOSEPH RAKOFSKY, and RAKOFSKY LAW FIRM, P.C.,<br />
INDE)( NO.: 105573/11<br />
Plaintiffs,<br />
-against<br />
<br />
THE WASHINGTON POST, et aI.,<br />
Defendants.<br />
<br />
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK PROTECTING THEM.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<b><span style="color: blue;">THESE GUYS REALLY DID GANG UP ON THIS GUY TO PROTECT THE LIES AND BAD, UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR OF ONE OF THEIR OWN.</span></b><br />
<br />
A Few Research Links on Rakofsky v. the Internet.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/17292223040/judge-not-impressed-rakofsky-v-internet-dismisses-defamation-claims.shtml" target="_blank">https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/17292223040/judge-not-impressed-rakofsky-v-internet-dismisses-defamation-claims.shtml</a><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110524/23465814426/recent-law-school-grad-gets-berated-judge-then-sues-nearly-everyone-who-discussed-case.shtml" target="_blank">https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110524/23465814426/recent-law-school-grad-gets-berated-judge-then-sues-nearly-everyone-who-discussed-case.shtml</a><br />
<br />
<b>Joseph Rakofsky reported the Truth and experienced Judicial Retaliation in mass.</b><br />
<br />
And there are many More. The Courts know and thus far have let these guys continue to use this same tactic in State and Federal Courts. I Allege over and over that all Marc Randazza, Ronald Green, J. Devoy and ALL the attorneys named in the cases above really are and have done this stuff and the courts NEED to stop letting them get away with it.<br />
<br />
Some more Drunken Tryst Research<br />
<a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/search?q=tryst" target="_blank">http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/search?q=tryst</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-90275031880833012062017-11-02T15:27:00.001-07:002017-11-02T15:27:01.961-07:00Embattled copyright lawyer uses DMCA to remove article about himself. Marc Randazza has Abused our Justice System OVER and OVER to remove online content that did not "flatter him", exposed him or flat out criticized him.<b><span style="font-size: large;">"Marc Randazza tells Wordpress that the unflattering story "is not fair use.</span></b><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">Well-known copyright lawyer Marc Randazza used the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to delete an online article about a dispute between his former employer and himself.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Click Below to Read the FULL document, So many Lies. Marc Randazza is the world's most hypocritical lawyer and violates First Amendment Rights in mass. </b></span><br />
<a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/02/embattled-copyright-lawyer-uses-dmca-to-remove-article-about-himself/" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/02/embattled-copyright-lawyer-uses-dmca-to-remove-article-about-himself/</span></a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-85268291915355952992017-11-02T13:23:00.002-07:002017-11-02T13:23:06.292-07:00When I First Spoke to Marc Randazza he said that the Big Media had a Monopoly on Free Speech and there was Not Much I Could Do about it. Guess I Proved First Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza VERY Wrong. <br />
Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox was the FIRST to gain Equal Free Speech Rights for ALL Bloggers to that of Institutional Press Journalists.<br />
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">It was ruled for the first time that a blogger is entitled to the same free speech protection as a journalist.
</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /><span style="color: #222222;">On 2014, blogger Crystal Cox accused Obsidian and Kevin D. Padrick of corrupt and fraudulent conduct. Although the court dismissed most of Cox's blog posts as opinion, it found one post to be more factual in its assertions (and, therefore, defamatory).</span></span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background-color: white; line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 6pt; margin-top: 6pt;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #222222; font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">It was ruled for the first time,</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States#cite_note-FAC20140124-17" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b0080; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: super; white-space: pre-wrap;">[17]</span></a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States#cite_note-CNS201401171-18" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b0080; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: super; white-space: pre-wrap;">[18]</span></a><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #222222; font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> by the </span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b0080; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</span></a><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #222222; font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">,</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States#cite_note-Arthur_L._Alarc.C3.B3n.2C_Milan_D._Smith.2C_Jr..2C_and_Andrew_D._Hurwitz-19" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b0080; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: super; white-space: pre-wrap;">[19]</span></a><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #222222; font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> that a </span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blog" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b0080; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">blogger</span></a><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #222222; font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> is entitled to the same free speech protection as a journalist and cannot be liable for defamation unless the blogger acted negligently.</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States#cite_note-Reuters_20140117-20" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b0080; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: super; white-space: pre-wrap;">[20]</span></a><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #222222; font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> In the decision, journalists and bloggers are equally protected under the First Amendment</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States#cite_note-FAC20140124-17" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b0080; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: super; white-space: pre-wrap;">[17]</span></a><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #222222; font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> because the "protections of the First Amendment do not turn on whether the defendant was a trained journalist, formally affiliated with traditional news entities, engaged in conflict-of-interest disclosure, went beyond just assembling others' writings, or tried to get both sides of a story."</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States#cite_note-Arthur_L._Alarc.C3.B3n.2C_Milan_D._Smith.2C_Jr..2C_and_Andrew_D._Hurwitz-19" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b0080; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: super; white-space: pre-wrap;">[19]</span></a><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #222222; font-family: Arial; vertical-align: super; white-space: pre-wrap;">:11–12</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States#cite_note-CNS201401172-21" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: #0b0080; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: super; white-space: pre-wrap;">[21]</span></a></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span id="docs-internal-guid-0c0a1cd0-7e0a-b5dd-a462-f8233aff7a3c"></span></span><br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #1155cc;">
</span><b>Source and more</b><span style="color: #1155cc;">
</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States" style="color: #1155cc; text-decoration-line: none;">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_the_United_States</a></span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-size: large;">I, Crystal Cox was the FIRST, because I refused Settlements over and over. I wanted a precedent to FREE all Citizen Journalists, Investigative Bloggers and Whistleblowers</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-size: large;">#DefamationCase #FreeSpeech #ConstitutionalLaw #CrystalCoxCase #Whistleblower #InvestigativeBlogger #Ant-Slapp #CitizenJournalist #FirstAmendment #Defamation #DefamationLawsuit </span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<br /></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-32059949202062426562017-11-01T18:42:00.001-07:002017-11-01T18:42:44.573-07:00Hypocritcal Attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group seems to be a but Slippery Under Oath or perhaps has even purjured himself yet again. Marc Randazza Bankruptcy filing as he relentless attacks blogger Crystal Cox, sure seems to be perjury to me.<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><a href="https://marcrandazzabankruptcy.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Marc Randazza Bankruptcy</a></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">In Marc Randazza’s Recent Filing,</span><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkibDluUDZkZ3MwREE/view?usp=sharing" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #1155cc; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> Motion for Default</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">, Case 16-01111-abl </span><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkibDluUDZkZ3MwREE/view" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #1155cc; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Doc 26 Entered 10/20/17</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">, he claims that ONLY upon Volokh being interested in teaming up with him was he then </span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">“willing to accept the case</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">”. Meaning the Crystal Cox Ninth Circuit Appeal. Yet Crystal Cox claims Randazza represented her before this and told others he was her attorney. Randazza states in earlies sworn documents a different version of his story, let’s take a look.</span></div>
<span id="docs-internal-guid-7ecfb42c-7a28-1e36-3442-6597867870ab"><br /></span>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkibDluUDZkZ3MwREE/view" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #1155cc; font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Page 38, Line 26-28 and Page 39 1-4, Case 16-01111-abl Doc 26, (Randazza Decl. ¶ 26) Says</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">:</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> “</span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Only</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> upon Mr. Volokh expressing an interest in teaming up on the case with him did Mr. Randazza decide that he was willing to accept the case. (Randazza Decl. ¶ 26).”</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">In this sworn statement (Randazza Decl. ¶ 26) Randazza claims he was</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><b> only interested</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> in representing me, Crystal Cox, with Volokh and only offered to represent me after this conversation. Even though,</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><b> the only reason Volokh was talking to Randazza about me, Crystal Cox was Randazza told Volokh he represented Crystal Cox</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">. And that he was brokering a deal with the Opposition in the Obsidian case, David Aman. </span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">The statement is false, and</span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> it is making a false declaration to a Federal Court while knowing full well it is False</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> as Randazza swore to different facts in Case 2:12-cv-02040-JAD-PAL</span><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY0FXWW1LMGN4ZWs/view" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #1155cc; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> Document 252 Filed 04/06/15, Exhibit 9</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">, </span><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY0FXWW1LMGN4ZWs/view" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #1155cc; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Marc Randazza’s sworn interrogatory answers</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">. </span></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">So in </span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Case 16-01111-abl Doc 26, Page 38, Line 26-28 and Page 39 1-4, </span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">we see RANDAZZA swearing that he </span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">ONLY</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"> agreed to Represent Cox after Volokh expressed interest to team up with him. We see below in a previous Sworn statement of Randazza that he was involved in representation BEFORE speaking with Volokh, talking strategy with Volokh, and only spoke with Volokh after he had already </span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">put in time and material into representation</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">. </span></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkicjBMV2pRSW16Q28/view?usp=sharing" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #1155cc; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Click Here for Exhibit clearly showing Volokh working with Randazza. Why would Volokh do that if Randazza did not flat out tell Volokh that he, Marc Randazza represented Cox</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">.</span></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<a href="https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkibl9KRndUTHVFNEU/edit" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #1155cc; font-family: Arial; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Click the Exhibit below for eMail from Volokh to Cox whereby Volokh says Marc told him that he was representing me, Crystal Cox. Randazza Continues to state that he was not my attorney nor acting as my attorney when the evidence paints a very different truth. </span></a></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY0FXWW1LMGN4ZWs/view?usp=sharing" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #1155cc; font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Interrogatory 21 Exhibit 9</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">:</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">“Did you have phone conversations with Eugene Volokh and state that you represented Cox and discuss with him your strategy, or a deal you were trying to make with the opposition, Plaintiff’s attorney David Aman?”</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Randazza’s Sworn RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 21:</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">"... Counterdefendant responds as follows:</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Counterdefendant spoke with Eugene Volokh in December 2011. </span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Counterdefendant informed Volokh that if he was going to represent Cox, that Randazza would gladly bow out, and defer to Volokh to handle the case.</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Volokh, however, said that he would prefer that Randazza co-counsel the case with him due to Volokh’s stated lack of litigation experience. Counterdefendant and Volokh discussed possible strategies that he and Volokh thought might be good ideas during that call.</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Counterdefendant and Volokh both discussed the fact that Cox’s interests would be better served through settlement."</span></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">What gave Marc Randazza a legal right to negotiate who gets to be my attorney with him, if he was not indeed my attorney, or acting as if he was my attorney?</span></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Randazza and Volokh discussed strategy? About Me? They discussed that a settlement was in my, Crystal Cox’s, best interest?</span></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">A couple of guys deciding what was in my best interest and Randazza proceeding with steps to negotiate what was in my best interest when Randazza clearly and plainly knew that I want to appeal. I did NOT want to settle nor did I want some aggressive, asshole man to decide it would be better if I settled and push me to do what I did want to do, negotiate behind my back, and trick and deceive me by letting the deadline run out while he held himself out as my attorney so no one else would represent me, thereby blocking me from appealing. He did not know I had talked to Volokh when he tried to pull off this malicious scheme. </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEifeUBdltZGrSobiM4ytFueLtxFwEvvW44vOxzK35nf4kMe1CLf3K3W8uJHIJ6e4V65px7lgVFccNLVCvwOhjnxJcDPFKkonZozJsRRm3KRbz2SW4MVIVyLdPFiJRtr-wWYXDq4pt60bdg/s1600/images+%25281%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="152" data-original-width="332" height="183" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEifeUBdltZGrSobiM4ytFueLtxFwEvvW44vOxzK35nf4kMe1CLf3K3W8uJHIJ6e4V65px7lgVFccNLVCvwOhjnxJcDPFKkonZozJsRRm3KRbz2SW4MVIVyLdPFiJRtr-wWYXDq4pt60bdg/s400/images+%25281%2529.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><b>In Conclusion, </b></span></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Page 38, Number 1-13 of </span><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY0FXWW1LMGN4ZWs/view?usp=sharing" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: #1155cc; font-family: Arial; font-weight: 700; text-decoration-line: underline; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Interrogatory 21 Exhibit 9</span></a><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">, Case 2:12-cv-02040-JAD-PAL Document 252 Filed 04/06/15 is Marc J. Randazza’s SWORN statement that the Interrogatory Answers are true to the best of his knowledge, yet we see on Page 38, Line 26-28 and Page 39 1-4, Case 16-01111-abl Doc 26, (Randazza Decl. ¶ 26) that <a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a> swears to the a VERY different Answer.</span></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkibDluUDZkZ3MwREE/view" target="_blank">See Case 16-01111-abl Doc 28 Entered 10/20/17, DECLARATION OF MARC J. RANDAZZA IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT ENTERED BY THE COURT Page 16, Line 23-25 says</a>:</span></div>
<b><span style="color: #990000; font-size: large;"><br /></span></b>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="color: #990000; font-size: large;"><b><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">“I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Dated: October 20, 2017.</span></b></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">/s/ Marc J. Randazza</span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br class="kix-line-break" /></span><span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><a href="http://randazzalegalgroupsucks.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">MARC J. RANDAZZA</a>, ESQ.”</span></div>
<br />
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">So How Can Both be True under penalty of perjury?</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><a href="https://marcrandazzabankruptcy.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">#MarcRandazzaBankruptcy</a> <a href="http://randazzalegalgroupsucks.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">#MarcRandazza</a> <a href="http://randazzalegalgroupsucks.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">#RandazzaQuotes</a> <a href="http://randazzalegalgroupsucks.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">#RandazzaLegalGroup</a> <a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Marc Randazza Bankruptcy</a></span></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-86052482831851090822017-10-29T15:51:00.001-07:002017-10-29T15:51:09.468-07:00In Randazza v. Cox, Nevada Judge Gloria Navarro issued an unconstitutional TRO against Blogger Crystal Cox and Gave Marc Randazza massive online content and intellectual property. Thereby shutting down Cox's speech and flat out stealing blogs, online content and redirecting MY WORK and PROPERTY to Randazza's Legal Blog SLAMMING me and Promoting him and his law firm. In that Case it was OK and seemingly Lawful for a Federal Judge to go ahead and take my Constitutional Rights. Check Out this case below where WORLDS Most Hypocritical Lawyer Marc Randazza Makes the OPPOSITE CASE AGAIN. <span style="color: #990000; font-size: x-large;">"In the </span><span style="color: blue; font-size: x-large;"><a href="https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3520097/028-Motion-to-Dissolve-and-Stay.pdf" target="_blank">motion to dissolve the order</a></span><span style="color: #990000; font-size: x-large;">, attorney Marc Randazza points out that fashioning a libel lawsuit as a tortious interference lawsuit doesn't change the ultimate goal of the litigation: to silence criticism."</span><br />
<br />
<br />
"<b><span style="color: blue; font-size: large;">Judge Decides Free Speech Is Still A Right; </span></b><br />Dumps Prior Restraint Order Against Mattress Review Site<br />
<br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
A couple of weeks ago, a federal judge in Utah <a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20170304/17525336840/utah-judge-wont-let-constitution-get-way-little-prior-restraint.shtml" style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">decided prior restraint</a> was the best way to handle a recently-filed defamation suit against Honest Mattress Reviews by Purple Innovations, makers of the Purple Mattress.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
Purple's lengthy filing contained numerous allegations of harm caused by Honest Mattress Reviews' extended commentary on the white plastic powder covering every mattress Purple ships. It also alleged HMR was just a front for site owner Ryan Monahan's brand management work with Purple's competitor, Ghostbed. Rather than give HMR a chance to respond, the judge decided the review site could publish nothing further about Purple or the lawsuit. It wasn't even allowed to refer to its previous rating of Purple's mattress.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
Honest Mattress Review didn't care much for this decision -- one it had been given no chance to contest. <a href="http://www.honestmattressreviews.com/purple-mattress-review/" style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">It immediately posted an article</a> about the case and offered to comply with the letter of the order, but perhaps not its spirit.</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<em>This temporary order commands that we take down all reviews, and even cease rating this company with a rating of “Poor.” Yes, indeed, we are no longer even permitted to rate this company as Poor. I guess we will change its rating to “💩.”</em></div>
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<em>[...]</em></div>
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<em>Do you trust a company that, rather than compete in the marketplace, decides that it will just try and sue negative reviews out of existence?</em></div>
</blockquote>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
Purple Innovations immediately returned to court, demanding it find HMR in contempt of its order, in particular pointing to the poo emoji and HMR's claims about the unconstitutionality of the order and Purple's alleged disingenuousness in filing the libel suit.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: black;"><a href="http://www.honestmattressreviews.com/purple-mattress-review/" style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">That review has since been reinstated</a> and given this header image.</span></div>
<div class="centered" style="background-color: white; display: table; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">
<img alt="" src="https://i.imgur.com/x8bzC2n.jpg" style="height: 225px; margin: 10px 0px; width: 500px;" /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
And HMR has published <a href="https://www.honestmattressreviews.com/purple-mattress-vs-honest-reviews/" style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">a long list of court documents</a> it has filed in this case. This includes a motion to dissolve the restraining order and a preliminary examination of the powdery substance Purple claims is harmless and that HMR claims could be hazardous to purchasers' health.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: blue; font-size: large;"><a href="https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3520097/028-Motion-to-Dissolve-and-Stay.pdf" target="_blank">In the <b>motion</b> [PDF] to dissolve the order, attorney Marc Randazza points out that fashioning a libel lawsuit as a tortious interference lawsuit doesn't change the ultimate goal of the litigation: to silence criticism.</a></span></div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<em>The action is a quintessential SLAPP suit designed to suppress negative consumer journalism. Plaintiffs have cleverly attempted to disguise this defamation claim as a Lanham Act claim – presumably to ensure the availability of Federal Court jurisdiction and to try to side-step the clear case law that cuts against them in defamation actions. But, no matter how eloquently someone may call a “dog” a “chicken,” it will never lay eggs. And styling a specious defamation claim as a Lanham Act claim does not remove the underlying speech from the protections afforded by the First Amendment.</em></div>
</blockquote>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
He also points out that Purple's claims that the plastic packing dust is harmless haven't been supported by anything Purple's willing to let customers and competitors view. Instead, it's only made vague assertions about its safety. And those statements are ultimately meaningless when examined closely.</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<em>Plaintiff sells mattresses that are made of a rubber honeycomb, which they then dust with a powder that they claim is made of plastic and has been shown to be polyethylene microspheres. In other words, someone who sleeps on these mattresses would be expected to inhale these microspheres. The Plaintiff claims that it is “non toxic” and “food grade” plastic – but this does not assuage the concerns. After all, a plastic fork is “food grade” and “non toxic” but you most certainly would not want to actually eat it. The same goes for what a person wants to put in their lungs. It was reasonable to be concerned about this “plastic powder” since (a) if the particles that make up this plastic “powder” are of a certain size, they will pass through the alveoli into the bloodstream; or (b) if they are a bit larger, they will simply lodge themselves inside the lungs.</em></div>
</blockquote>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
To support its claims, HMR put a Harvard Professor of Pathology to work. Dr. John Godleski's <a href="https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3520096/028-1-Exhibit-1-Godleski-Report.pdf" style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">report</a>[PDF] is far from complete at this point, but what's contained in his preliminary examination of the powder doesn't appear to agree with Purple's assertions of harmlessness.</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<em>By Fourier Transformed Infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), the white powder particles were shown to be polyethylene, and the purple frame was found to be polyethylene-polypropylene copolymer. The foam portion of the mattress is still understudy, but has characteristics of butadiene, and may be a form of butadiene polymer.</em></div>
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<em>Polyethylene is a common plastic formed into many structures. As inhalable microspheres, these have the potential to cause respiratory irritation especially when inhaled in large numbers as shown in my laboratory (1- 4). In addition, polyethylene has been associated with allergy in the form of either asthma or contact dermatitis in sensitized individuals (5-7). Based on this assessment, it is important for consumers to be aware of the composition of this fine particulate matter in the mattress which may be released into the air and has the potential for the development of respiratory or dermal hypersensitivity in some individuals.</em></div>
</blockquote>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
Also included in the filed documents is <a href="http://www.honestmattressreviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/031-Werner-Declaration.pdf" style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">an affidavit</a> that undercuts Purple's claims about HMR's site owner being a competitor's "brand manager." This is central to Purple's Lanham Act claims -- the claims it's using to sidestep anti-SLAPP motions. The affidavit from the competitor (Ghostbed) notes HMR's site owner has never been directly employed by Ghostbed and that Ghostbed told him to stop referring to himself as its "brand manager" after noticing that statement on his Twitter profile.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
The judge presiding over the case appears to have been overwhelmed by the pile of documents landing on his desk. A short <a href="https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3520094/Purpleorder.pdf" style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">order</a> [PDF] issued on the 15th shows what can happen when a normally adversarial process is allowed to be, you know, <em>adversarial</em>.</div>
<blockquote style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<div style="padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<em>For the reasons set forth in the parties’ briefing and at oral argument, the court finds a lack of “clear and unequivocal” support for a right to relief that is necessary for the entry of the “extraordinary remedy” of a preliminary injunction. Greater Yellowstone Coal v. Flowers, 321 F.3d 1250, 1256 (10th Cir. 2003). As such, the court hereby grants Defendants’ motions to dissolve the Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. No. 36), and denies Plaintiff’s oral Motion to convert the Temporary Restraining Order into a Preliminary Injunction. The court similarly denies Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Conduct Expedited Discovery (Dkt. No. 39) and Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Defendants Should not be Held in Contempt (Dkt. No. 17). The court further denies Defendants’ request for sanctions, finding that such sanctions are not warranted here.</em></div>
</blockquote>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
The restraining order is lifted and HMR's turd-laced post isn't in danger of being found contemptuous. The lawsuit should continue in a more constitutional fashion from this point forward.<br />
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms", arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12.96px; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="font-size: 12.96px;">Source</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms", arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12.96px; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20170318/11382836946/judge-decides-free-speech-is-still-right-dumps-prior-restraint-order-against-mattress-review-site.shtml" target="_blank">https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20170318/11382836946/judge-decides-free-speech-is-still-right-dumps-prior-restraint-order-against-mattress-review-site.shtml</a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms", arial, helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">"<b>Conclusion and Relief Sought</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;">Because</span><b> Defendants are likely to succeed on a motion to vacate the TRO, before this Court </b></span><b style="font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">or on appeal, a stay of the TRO is warranted. Defendants’ fundamental First Amendment rights </b><b style="font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">must not be stymied by the speculations of a Plaintiff who wishes to shut down discussion rather </b><b style="font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">than answer legitimate questions, no matter how hyperbolically raised. Plaintiff has <span style="color: blue;">no likelihood </span></b><b style="font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: blue;">of success on its underlying claims and was not entitled to the TRO.</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">Case 2:17-cv-00138-DB Document 28 Filed 03/09/17 Page 23 of 25</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">- 24 -</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: blue; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">The exigency and urgency of dissolving this temporary restraining order can not be</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="color: blue;">overstated. Even a temporary suppression of First Amendment rights is itself irreparable harm.</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">However, given that this is information consumers need to make an informed decision about the </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">health risks inherent in use of the Purple Mattress, even a temporary suppression of this </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">information could be the proximate cause of actual illness or injury."</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">" Plaintiff is clearly aggressively intent on suppressing this </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">information. At this point, the reporting has been shored up by the expert report of Dr. Godleski. </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">The Purple Mattress, as currently manufactured, appears to be a public health hazard. This Court </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">should abide no further censorship. "</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><br /><b>Source of Above and Full Hypocritical Filing</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;"><a href="https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3520097/028-Motion-to-Dissolve-and-Stay.pdf" target="_blank">https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3520097/028-Motion-to-Dissolve-and-Stay.pdf</a></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif; font-size: x-large;"><b>Judge Grants Randazza's Order. To bad I did not have this judge when Randazza got a TRO against me in Randazza v. Cox</b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif; font-size: 12.96px;"><br />"Before the court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Defendants Should</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333; font-size: 12.96px;">not be Held in Contempt (Dkt. No. 17),</span><b><span style="color: blue;"> Defendants Ryan Monahan and Honest Reviews, LLC’s</span></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: blue; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><b>Emergency Motion to Stay and Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order (Amended) (Dkt. No. </b></span><b style="color: blue; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">28), Defendant Ghostbed Inc.’s Motion to Dissolve the Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. No. </b><b style="color: blue; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">36),</b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333; font-size: 12.96px;">"For the reasons set forth in the parties’ briefing and at oral argument,</span><b><span style="color: blue;"> the court finds a</span></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: blue; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><b>lack of “clear and unequivocal” support for a right to relief that is necessary for the entry of the </b></span><b style="font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: blue;">“extraordinary remedy” of a preliminary injunction.</span></b><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif; font-size: 12.96px;"> Greater Yellowstone Coal v. Flowers, 321 </span><span style="font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333; font-size: 12.96px;">F.3d 1250, 1256 (10th Cir. 2003). As such, </span><b><span style="color: blue;">the court hereby grants Defendants’ motions to </span></b></span><b style="color: blue; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">dissolve the Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. No. 36), and denies Plaintiff’s oral Motion to </b><b style="font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: blue;">convert the Temporary Restraining Order into a Preliminary Injunction.</span></b><span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif; font-size: 12.96px;"> "</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif; font-size: 12.96px;"><br />"For the foregoing reasons, and for those expressed in the parties’ briefing and oral</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;">arguments, Docket Numbers 17 and 39, as well as Plaintiff’s oral Motion to convert the</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;">Temporary Restraining Order into a Preliminary Injunction, are hereby DENIED. Docket</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;">Number 28 and the portion of Docket Number 36 requesting dissolution of the Temporary</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;">Restraining Order are GRANTED. Defendants’ request for sanctions is DENIED."</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;">Source of Above and Full Judicial Order</span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;"><a href="https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3520094/Purpleorder.pdf" target="_blank">https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3520094/Purpleorder.pdf</a></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms" , "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.96px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms", arial, helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<b>Check out Randazza v. Cox Docket and See how to REALLY use prior restraint to suppress speech and flat out steal online content AND top search engine placement. </b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms", arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12.96px; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="font-size: 12.96px;"><a href="http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" target="_blank">http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html</a><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "trebuchet ms", arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12.96px; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEibbHOVzSqqQFN61QLDxz7KOcCY_p3Gd8kelIreZSYQZYMq-2va0E6bC_YUhN1x-wmJgZhAkemO9iNRhKtdqIHKjiqW6pavdKo7ZDc4XhDaUeWxCp2p4LSE2f-clvXU-MZZsIEDzTRFZGc/s1600/Crystal+Cox+Marc+Randazza.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="390" data-original-width="600" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEibbHOVzSqqQFN61QLDxz7KOcCY_p3Gd8kelIreZSYQZYMq-2va0E6bC_YUhN1x-wmJgZhAkemO9iNRhKtdqIHKjiqW6pavdKo7ZDc4XhDaUeWxCp2p4LSE2f-clvXU-MZZsIEDzTRFZGc/s1600/Crystal+Cox+Marc+Randazza.jpg" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: 12.96px;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<span style="color: blue; font-size: large;"><b>Lot's More Coming SOON on how to us a TRO effectively to Steal Content, Steal Search Engine Placement, Steal Intellectual Property and More. As inspired by Randazza Legal Group, Marc Randazza, J. DeVoy and Ronald Green. </b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: "trebuchet ms", arial, helvetica, sans-serif; padding: 0px 0px 10px;">
<div style="color: #333333; font-size: 12.96px;">
<br /></div>
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Questions or Tips??? eMail me at ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com</span></b><br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></b>
<span style="font-size: x-small;">#MarcRandazza #RandazzaQuotes #RandazzaLegalGroup #FreeSpeech </span></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-20971629726230045242017-10-26T12:21:00.001-07:002017-10-26T12:21:38.446-07:00Marc J. Randazza, Tactics Used by Attorneys to Bully and Harass Litigants by Blogger Crystal Cox#MarcRandazza #RandazzaLegalGroup #JudicialRetaliation #GangStalkingAttorneys<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/X4V3x97VELo" width="560"></iframe><br />
<br />
<b>Have a Marc Randazza Tip? eMail me at ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com </b>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-43220151548264788822017-10-25T19:04:00.000-07:002017-10-25T19:04:46.739-07:00Marc Randazza Bankruptcy Challenges by Liberty Media<b>Marc Randazza Bankruptcy and Liberty Media</b><br />
<br />
"In the meantime, Randazza's old employer, <b><span style="color: blue;">Liberty Media, is challenging his Nevada court filing seeking Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.</span></b> In that filing, Randazza claimed assets of up to $10 million, and liabilities of up to $50 million. Randazza included in his liabilities <b><span style="color: #cc0000;">a potential $10 million judgement against him in a lawsuit with a blogger, Crystal Cox of Washington;</span></b> $1 million to Liberty; as well as another $1 million judgement against him in a lawsuit he's embroiled in with Roca Labs of Largo, Florida."<br />
<br />
Source and More<br />
<a href="http://1701news.com/node/1183/so-who-klingon-lawyer-marc-randazza.html" target="_blank">http://1701news.com/node/1183/so-who-klingon-lawyer-marc-randazza.html</a><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><u>Liberty Media Opposition Motion (Doc. 38)<br /></u></b></div>
"In an effort to <b>avoid payment </b>of the entire monetary component of the IAA, and before the<br />
IAA could be confirmed by the state court, Debtor, by and through its counsel L&Z, initiated<br />
settlement negotiations with E/L. During these negotiations, Debtor <b><span style="color: #990000;">consistently used the threat of</span></b><br />
<b><span style="color: #990000;">a bankruptcy petition </span></b>in an attempt to negotiate a sum of payment significantly reduced from that<br />
awarded to E/L in the IAA. <span style="color: blue;"><b>Not only did Debtor use the threat of bankruptcy as a cudgel, but he and</b></span><span style="color: blue;"><b>his allegedly estranged wife have initiated sealed divorce proceedings, and dissipated assets</b></span>."<br />
<br />
"Debtor attempted delay for two reasons: (1) in a misguided effort to stay the award of attorneys fees by the Arbitrator, as well as the confirmation of the IAA by the state court; and (2) to push the date of petition out more than 90 days, so that <b><span style="color: blue;">Debtor’s fraudulent, improper, and preferential transfers could not be clawed back, including payments to his attorneys L&Z</span></b>.<br />
<br />
According to Debtor’s schedules filed on September 11, 2015, Debtor has deposited with<br />
L&Z sums totaling $94,000. [ECF 15] On September 22, 2015, L&Z filed the instant Application<br />
to Employ and Retain Larson & Zirzow, LLC as Attorneys for the Debtor Nunc Pro Tunc to the<br />
Petition Date."<br />
<br />
"According to the retainer agreements and statements made therein, L&Z entered into<br />
representation of Debtor as of June 11, 2015 for “pre-bankruptcy settlement negotiations and to<br />
attend a settlement conference. The Debtor paid L&Z a flat fee of $10,000.00 for this engagement.”<br />
<br />
"L&Z also purports to have been retained, via two separate retainer agreements, for representation in both a bankruptcy action, and a potential adversary proceeding."<br />
<br />
"the second was for potential nondischargeability litigation. "<br />
<br />
"L&Z’s Application is deficient as it relates to exactly what the scope of services are that it<br />
has billed for as of yet. In fact, L&Z only informs as to the fact that it has received a total sum of<br />
$94,000 for legal services in connection with Debtor’s Chapter 11 case. “Of this sum, L&Z billed<br />
and was paid the sum of $26,908.82 prior to the Petition Date, and L&Z currently holds in trust the<br />
remainder sum of $67,091.18 <b><span style="color: blue;">(the “Remaining Retainer”) a portion of which has been allocated</span></b><br />
<b><span style="color: blue;">pursuant to the Representation Agreements for potential adversary proceedings.”</span></b> [ECF 18 at ¶16 (emphasis added)] This Application utterly fails to identify and delineate what services were<br />
provided totaling $26,908.82."<br />
<br />
"In any event, all transfers were made within 90 days of the filing of Debtor’s Petition. As<br />
such, the “pre-bankruptcy” retainer fees charged and collected by L&Z constitute an avoidable<br />
preferential transfer, and the funds must be clawed back to the estate. As a result, L&Z will lose<br />
their status as “disinterested parties” and are therefore not qualified to serve as attorneys for the<br />
Debtor.<br /><br />
II. L&Z’S APPLICATION IS INSUFFICIENT TO SATISFY THE TEST FOR<br />
APPROVAL OF HIRING OF PROFESSIONALS.<br /><br />
L&Z’s employment as attorneys for the debtor in possession in a Chapter 11 case is<br />
governed by § 327(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, which requires court approval for the attorney's<br />
employment. The bankruptcy court is charged with “ensur[ing] that attorneys who represent the<br />
debtor do so in the best interests of the bankruptcy estate.” In re Park–Helena Corp., 63 F.3d 877,<br />
880 (9th Cir.1995). Under § 327, an attorney for a debtor cannot “hold or represent an interest<br />
adverse to the estate”; he or she must be a “disinterested person.” 11 U.S.C. § 327(a).<br /><br />Any creditor of the estate, or anyone with “an interest materially adverse to the interest of the estate ... by reason of any direct or indirect relationship to, connection with, or interest in, the debtor,” is not a disinterested person. 11 U.S.C. §§ 101(14)(A), (C). A “creditor” includes any “entity that has a<br />
claim against the debtor that arose at the time of or before the order for relief concerning the<br />
debtor.” § 101(10)(A). A “claim” includes any “right to payment.” § 101(5)(A).<br />
To enable the Bankruptcy Court to evaluate an attorney's potential employment, Rule<br />
2014(a) requires that an application for employment of an attorney under § 327 “shall be<br />
accompanied by a verified statement of the person to be employed setting forth the person's<br />
connections with the debtor, creditors, any other party in interest, their respective attorneys and<br />
accountants, the United States trustee, or any person employed in the office of the United States<br />
trustee.” Fed. R. Bankr.P. 2014(a). This disclosure requirement is applied “strictly.” Park–Helena,<br />
63 F.3d at 881.<br /><br />
An attorney approved for employment under § 327 must apply for interim or final<br />
compensation, which is subject to approval of the Bankruptcy Court. 11 U.S.C. §§ 328–31; see also<br />
In re Chapel Gate Apartments, Ltd., 64 B.R. 569, 575 (Bankr.N.D.Tex.1986) (noting that “fees in<br />
bankruptcy cases ... are subject to review, modification, and outright cancellation by the Court”).<br />
Rule 2016(a) requires an attorney seeking compensation and/or reimbursement of expenses to file<br />
an application “setting forth a detailed statement of (1) the services rendered, time expended and<br />
expenses incurred, and (2) the amounts requested.”<br />
<br />
The fee application must also include, inter alia, “a statement as to what payments have theretofore been made or promised to the applicant for services rendered or to be rendered in any capacity whatsoever in connection with the case, [and] the source of the compensation so paid or promised.” Id. After notice and a hearing, the court may award “reasonable compensation for actual, necessary services rendered,” as well as “reimbursement for actual, necessary expenses.” §330(a)(1)."<br />
<br />
Source and Full Filing<br />
<a href="http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.38.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.38.0.pdf</a><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b><br /></b>
<b>Liberty Media Move for Order to Modify Stay</b><br />
<b><a href="http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.60.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.60.0.pdf</a></b><br />
<br />
<b>Doc. 60-2 to above Motion</b><br />
<a href="http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.60.2.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.60.2.pdf</a><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award Exhibit - 60-6</b><br />
<b><a href="http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.60.6.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.60.6.pdf</a></b><br />
<br />
<b>Liberty Media Reply</b><br />
<b><a href="http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.80.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.80.0.pdf</a></b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>COMPLAINT by Liberty Media and Others to Determine Non-Dischargeable Debt</b><br />
<b><a href="http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.83.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.83.0.pdf</a></b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Doc. 120 filed by Liberty Media, First Amended Complaint, Demand for Jury Trial</b><br />
<b><a href="http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.120.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.120.0.pdf</a></b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Marc Randazza Bankruptcy Case Docket</b><br />
<a href="http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.docket.html" target="_blank">http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.docket.html</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<b>Doc. 148 Settlement</b><br />
<a href="http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.148.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.148.0.pdf</a><br />
<a href="http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.157.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.157.0.pdf</a><br />
<br />
<b>EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER DIRECTING EXAMINATION</b><br />
<b>PURSUANT TO FED.R.BANKR.P.2004 OF MARC J. RANDAZZA</b><br />
<div>
Doc. 187</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
"Creditors Excelsior Media Corp. (“Excelsior”) and <b>Liberty Media Holdings, LLC</b><br />
(“Liberty” and together with Excelsior, “Creditors”), by and through their counsel, James D.<br />
Greene, Esq. of Greene Infuso, LLP pursuant to section 105 of the Bankruptcy Code and Rule<br />
2004 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rule 2004 of the Local Rules of<br />
Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure, hereby apply to the Court for entry of <b>order directing Debtor</b><br />
<b>Marc J. Randazza (“Debtor”) to appear for and submit to examination under oath</b> before certified court reporter at the office of Greene Infuso, LLP, 3030 South Jones Blvd. Suite 101, Las Vegas, Nevada 89146 on a date and time to be determined, providing that notice of said examination is to be provided no less than 10 judicial days before such examination date. In support of this<br />
application (“Application”), Creditors state as follows:<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<div>
<b>LEGAL ARGUMENT</b></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
An examination pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2004 can be ordered [o]n motion of any</div>
<div>
party in interest.” In re Stasz, 387 B.R. 271, 273 n.3 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2008); see also In re Lifeco</div>
<div>
Inv. Grp., Inc., 173 B.R. 478, 480 (Bankr. D. Del 1994), quoting Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2004(a).</div>
<div>
Bankruptcy Rule 2004 further provides that the Court may order the examination and the</div>
<div>
production of documentary evidence concerning any matter that relates “to the liabilities and</div>
<div>
financial condition of the debtor, or to any matter which may affect the administration of the</div>
<div>
debtor’s estate, or… any other matter relevant to the case or tot the formulation of a plan.” Fed.</div>
<div>
R. Bankr. P. 2004(b); see also In re Dinubilo, 177 B.R. 932, 936 n.6 (E.D. Cal. 1993) (noting that</div>
<div>
“[u]nder Rule 2004, a court may order the examination of any person on motion of any party in</div>
<div>
interest.”). </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Generally, examinations under Bankruptcy Rule 2004 are for the “purpose of</div>
<div>
discovering assets and unearthing frauds.” In re Rafsky, 300 B.R. 152, 153 n.2 (Bankr. D. Conn.</div>
<div>
2003) (citation omitted); In re N. Plaza LLC, 395 B.R. 113, 122 n.9 (S.D. Cal. 2008).</div>
<div>
The scope of a Bankruptcy Rule 2004 examination is “unfettered and broad,” as the plain</div>
<div>
language of the rule indicates. See 9 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 2004.02[1] at 2004-6 (15th ed. Rev.</div>
<div>
1997); In re Dinublilo, 177 B. R. at 939 quoting In re GHR Energy Corp., 33 B.R. 451, 453</div>
<div>
(Bankr. D. Mass. 1983). </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
The broad latitude of Bankruptcy Rule 2004 examination furthers the purpose of the rule, which is “to allow the court to gain a clear picture of the condition and the whereabouts of the bankrupt’s estate. In re Int’l Fibercom, Inc., 283 B.R. 290, 292 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 2002) (permitted Bankruptcy Rule 2004 examination aimed at “obtaining information that will … potentially uncover additional claims that may exist for the benefit of the estate”); see also In re W & S Investments, Inc., 985 F.2d 577 (9th Cir. 1993) (“Bankruptcy Rule 2004 is a broadly construed discovery device…”); In re French, 145 B. R 991, 992 (Bankr. D.S.D. 1992) (“Bankruptcy Rule 2004… does not offer the procedural safeguards available under Rule 26 of the Federal Rule Rules of Civil Procedure.”)."</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
"The information and documents which Creditors seek through this Application relate to</div>
<div>
matters that are clearly with the permitted scope of Rule 2004, including: (i) property of the</div>
<div>
Debtor’s bankruptcy estate; (ii) transactions and business dealings involving the Debtor and</div>
<div>
family members and corporate entities; (iii) potential claims <b><span style="color: blue;">the Creditor may have against third</span></b></div>
<div>
<b><span style="color: blue;">parties;</span></b> and (iv) other matters affecting the administration of the Debtor’s estate."</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Source and Full Document</div>
<div>
<a href="http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.187.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.187.0.pdf</a></div>
<br />
<b>Above Order Granted</b><br />
<a href="http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.188.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia800807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.188.0.pdf</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<b>Doc. 191 Liberty Media SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT</b><br />
<b>OF MOTION FOR ORDER </b><b>CONFIRMING INTERIM</b><b>ARBITRATION AWARD</b><br />
<a href="http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.191.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia600807.us.archive.org/26/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.191.0.pdf</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: blue;">CAN YOU SAY PATTERN AND HISTORY ???</span></b><br />
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-68629552756521289992017-10-25T09:53:00.001-07:002017-10-25T09:53:06.884-07:00Ever Wonder how to Use a TRO to Steal Online Content, Intellectual Property, Someone's Work Product and Proprietary Methods? And completely IGNORE the First Amendment? Wonder No More. Let Attorney Marc Randazza Show you the Way. How to Side Step that Pesky First Amendment by using an Unconstitutional TRO, inspired by my former Unconstitutional, First Amendment Attorney Marc J. Randazza, Attorney Ronald Green and the Randazza Legal Group Law Firm.<br /><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqGgRJTD8JT80XLJTlWyl_8DcBuVcp5qpcU2iaQEcuBObWYzAfUngiFAm5RaBtZsUBd5c3ppJNc8STpd1MKkmo5dCI2tWHt8RV-fYj7t5-uRFRIfv7bnObLbjZ07pRFqznqVe-8GEw_R8/s1600/images+%25281%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="152" data-original-width="332" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqGgRJTD8JT80XLJTlWyl_8DcBuVcp5qpcU2iaQEcuBObWYzAfUngiFAm5RaBtZsUBd5c3ppJNc8STpd1MKkmo5dCI2tWHt8RV-fYj7t5-uRFRIfv7bnObLbjZ07pRFqznqVe-8GEw_R8/s1600/images+%25281%2529.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Detailed Step By Step How To Coming Soon</span></b></div>
<br />
Check out the Court Ruling Below whereby Randazza successfully WON is argument that A TRO is Unconstitutional.<br />
<br />
"No. 3D12-3189 Lower Tribunal No. 11-17842,<br />
<br />
Irina Chevaldina, Appellant,<br />
vs.<br />
R.K./FL Management, Inc., et al.,Appellee"<br />
<br />
<a href="http://3dca.flcourts.org/Opinions/3D12-3189.op..pdf" target="_blank">http://3dca.flcourts.org/Opinions/3D12-3189.op..pdf</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhliVjt5Zb87MR66D5IFjsLnRxdd8ppFy0vnLiWrxuKqqfHSYU6OQEamxo5jHmkBCejXwQes-OZXadb4PAF0SsgA24QawoM490W7HTU8rN1UbVgaSVitk2HYwAycnI9pKgIOkFhsHqwWAg/s1600/unconstitutional.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="283" data-original-width="427" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhliVjt5Zb87MR66D5IFjsLnRxdd8ppFy0vnLiWrxuKqqfHSYU6OQEamxo5jHmkBCejXwQes-OZXadb4PAF0SsgA24QawoM490W7HTU8rN1UbVgaSVitk2HYwAycnI9pKgIOkFhsHqwWAg/s1600/unconstitutional.png" /></a></div>
<br />
Absolutely Unconstitutional TRO Motion filed by my former attorney Marc Randazza. He was successful in using this Unconstitutional TRO to steal my intellectual property, my work product, my search engine placement, my online content, and flat out steal blogs and domain names with NO First Amendment Adjudication whatsoever<br />
<br />
Click Below to Read, and You too Can STEAL Content, Search Engine Placement and Intellectual Property via a TRO.<br />
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/Case%202:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL%20Document%202%20Filed%2011/28/12" target="_blank">Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL Document 2 Filed 11/28/12</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgxfL_gv_qB3rpvBLhukWfPtToqGOYmMtC8RWnUC9Rb_oBiIVSFost2eq0nd86fe6FUT3HqaWfwXIov7-rLnX5MmFXlwRv3a9ot2DXPDySzCZTeZeTKyNnIb1tmkOS9i8MHB3eDox4an7M/s1600/images.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="158" data-original-width="280" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgxfL_gv_qB3rpvBLhukWfPtToqGOYmMtC8RWnUC9Rb_oBiIVSFost2eq0nd86fe6FUT3HqaWfwXIov7-rLnX5MmFXlwRv3a9ot2DXPDySzCZTeZeTKyNnIb1tmkOS9i8MHB3eDox4an7M/s1600/images.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<b>Also Check Out links below for Tips and Trick to use the Power of the Courts to your Benefit. No worry about those bad reviews or Gripe Sites, just get a TRO and WaLa you OWN the Constitutional Rights and Property of anyone you please. </b><br />
<br />
"First Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group SAYS that Preliminary Injunctions are unconstitutional, they are unlawful prior restraint, they are "patently unconstitutional", they are clearly an "unconstitutional remedy". Especially if there was no prior First Amendment Adjudication."<br />
<a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2017/10/first-amendment-attorney-marc-randazza.html" target="_blank">http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2017/10/first-amendment-attorney-marc-randazza.html</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVVsvJ5nDJ2SwzGTRnkjUZnNwCBlItI907vZkTWMrYAkLU73lNFv8qRHxMvWzko0_AAHZ5bCGOHUsjp7bvfmgh4AujPxCE4ISBtijkOl_KsKhSoFlrNE_0zApsIgNVvm5COn_dm11sM4U/s1600/images+%25282%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="195" data-original-width="259" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVVsvJ5nDJ2SwzGTRnkjUZnNwCBlItI907vZkTWMrYAkLU73lNFv8qRHxMvWzko0_AAHZ5bCGOHUsjp7bvfmgh4AujPxCE4ISBtijkOl_KsKhSoFlrNE_0zApsIgNVvm5COn_dm11sM4U/s1600/images+%25282%2529.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
"Pro Se Litigant Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox Pokes a BIT of FUN at the OUTBREAK of Preliminary Injunctions, Sweeping Rapidly, Seemingly Out of Control, through the District of Nevada, yet Granny Goose Alleges these RULINGS are an "extraordinary remedy". Crystal Cox Calls BULLSHIT. ViaView , Inc. Plaintiff v. BLUE MIST MEDIA; ERIC S. CHANSON; KEVIN C. BOLLAERT; CODY ALVIAR; ROY E. CHANSON; and AMY L. CHANSON ~ Randazza V. Cox, Who Will be NEXT?"<br />
<a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2017/10/pro-se-litigant-investigative-blogger.html" target="_blank">http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2017/10/pro-se-litigant-investigative-blogger.html</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhIwBxzBd8O4XBld-vhUp5k9Nohe4qCyb7YF6KIWMaoAwY_y4Wz0Qa3eBL1UOetY4y5bHFEzxnZ0lq3jfww3wgC4q88vC5CB5gCl08zJYVQ_epHCoAPe5qnN5QayRqaPSXfCNH0mGwHVqY/s1600/First+Amendment+Protection+Violated+by+Marc+Randazza.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="219" data-original-width="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhIwBxzBd8O4XBld-vhUp5k9Nohe4qCyb7YF6KIWMaoAwY_y4Wz0Qa3eBL1UOetY4y5bHFEzxnZ0lq3jfww3wgC4q88vC5CB5gCl08zJYVQ_epHCoAPe5qnN5QayRqaPSXfCNH0mGwHVqY/s1600/First+Amendment+Protection+Violated+by+Marc+Randazza.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
"Marc Randazza Defends Rush Limbaugh in ALLEGED Free Speech Rights, While Marc Randazza TAKES away the Rights of Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of ALL Bloggers and Citizens Journalists."<br />
<a href="http://whistleblowermediacrystalcox.blogspot.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-defends-rush-limbaugh-in.html" target="_blank">http://whistleblowermediacrystalcox.blogspot.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-defends-rush-limbaugh-in.html</a><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjo7sewbJmHUu8hY9OV_x5KLxCFPXIJNTBJ4g_pfPOr7jKe0mSuJVQ8K0Kafm97EOJM6LtlKBNvh9fgjNNeGhsm3jsWquHQdai71TbrT_G3-_S1IOvkVxa8MxA5xqqg1w4GeWKxBlbxz00/s1600/images+%25285%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="247" data-original-width="204" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjo7sewbJmHUu8hY9OV_x5KLxCFPXIJNTBJ4g_pfPOr7jKe0mSuJVQ8K0Kafm97EOJM6LtlKBNvh9fgjNNeGhsm3jsWquHQdai71TbrT_G3-_S1IOvkVxa8MxA5xqqg1w4GeWKxBlbxz00/s1600/images+%25285%2529.jpg" /></a></div>
First Amendment Attorney Marc J. Randazza SUES blogger Crystal L. Cox to Suppress her Speech. 5 years later wants her to pay his legal fees for his Unconstitutional Retaliatory Lawsuit against her. $350,000 to SUE a Blogger over a $10 Domain Name that Trademark Attorney, Domain Name, First Amendment Expert Marc Randazza was to damn dumb to buy. WOW. Check out these BILLS folks. All to suppress the speech of someone speaking critical of big baby Marc Randazza.<br />
<a href="http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/2017/10/first-amendment-attorney-marc-j.html" target="_blank">http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/2017/10/first-amendment-attorney-marc-j.html</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKFqUv5-qBk8exWNluecGS0fh4bW-OqjcpyqlOICqkfXNnCv5AhlRzFRuHFa4MUBbswdkz46ZJZVm-iIXxuDkrmrl9gW2NS6OzwZhdDJEhnvhJ5FJKqpWc14vgWVQC5Wrlzom2xZKP25M/s1600/images+%25281%2529+%25281%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="180" data-original-width="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKFqUv5-qBk8exWNluecGS0fh4bW-OqjcpyqlOICqkfXNnCv5AhlRzFRuHFa4MUBbswdkz46ZJZVm-iIXxuDkrmrl9gW2NS6OzwZhdDJEhnvhJ5FJKqpWc14vgWVQC5Wrlzom2xZKP25M/s1600/images+%25281%2529+%25281%2529.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
A Trademark Attorney, First Amendment Expert SUES a former client claiming a Trademark Infringement on Gripe Sites.<br />
<a href="https://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/2015/04/a-trademark-attorney-first-amendment.html" target="_blank">https://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.com/2015/04/a-trademark-attorney-first-amendment.html</a><br />
<br />
<br />
Oh and Don't Miss the Infamous Kaplan Letter where Hypocritical Attorney Marc Randazza and his law firm Randazza Legal Group really lay it on thick. (The opposite argument he made in suing me, Crystal Cox, his former client.)<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiZEFJQW95MXNFQUU/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiZEFJQW95MXNFQUU/view?usp=sharing</a><br />
<br />
<b>Much more Details Coming soon, so that you to Can use the Power and Privilege of our Court System to get a TRO against your enemy speaking critical of you and not have to concern yourself with the First Amendment or any kind of actual factual due process. </b><br />
<b><br /></b>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-66404068565238888142017-10-24T20:23:00.001-07:002017-10-24T20:23:08.489-07:00First Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group SAYS that Preliminary Injunctions are unconstitutional, they are unlawful prior restraint, they are "patently unconstitutional", they are clearly an "unconstitutional remedy". Especially if there was no prior First Amendment Adjudication."<b style="text-align: center;"><u>Let's Look at the RULING and Marc Randazza's </u></b><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b><u>Big Preliminary Injunction VICTORY</u></b></div>
<br />A Bit from Marc Randazza's Victory APPEALING an alleged <b>unconstitutional preliminary injunction</b> against his client. Even though Marc Randazza himself used an unconstitutional preliminary injunction against me, Crystal Cox and stole my search engine ranking, my intellectual property, my blogs and then proceeded to violate my privacy rights, constitutional rights, civil rights and to harass and defame me for years.<br /><br />""Irina Chevaldina <b>appeals an order granting a preliminary injunction</b> to “enjoin tortious interference, stalking, trespass and defamatory blogs” entered in favor of Raanan Katz and the other named appellees, plaintiffs in the circuit court. We vacate the order and injunction. "<br /><br />Source<br /><a href="http://3dca.flcourts.org/Opinions/3D12-3189.op..pdf" style="text-decoration-line: none;">http://3dca.flcourts.org/Opinions/3D12-3189.op..pdf</a><br /><br /><br />" In this appeal, we <b>review a temporary injunction</b> in the circuit court action<br />which determined that “the Defendants have blogged extensively about the<br />Plaintiff and many of these blogs are arguably defamatory. Although ultimately a<br />defamation trial will be held, this Court ORDERS the Defendants not to enter<br />defamatory blogs in the future.”<br /><br />The court determined that:<br /><br />Plaintiffs have a substantial likelihood of ultimately prevailing on the<br />merits of their claims, and there is a substantial threat of irreparable<br />injury to the Plaintiffs if <b>injunctive relief is not granted</b>, that the<br />threatened injury to Plaintiffs outweighs whatever damage the<br />injunction would cause the Defendants, and that the injunction would<br />not be adverse to the public interest."<br /><br />Source<br /><a href="http://3dca.flcourts.org/Opinions/3D12-3189.op..pdf" style="text-decoration-line: none;">3dca.flcourts.org/Opinions/3D12-3189.op..pdf</a><br /><br />In Randazza v. Cox there was no <b>"substantial likelihood of ultimately prevailing on the</b><br /><b>merits of their claims" </b>and there certainly was no First Amendment Adjudication BEFORE Plaintiff Marc Randazza seized Blogger Crystal Cox's intellectual property.<br /><br />See the Link Below that shot down all of Plaintiff Randazza's unsupported causes of action<br />in a Denial of a Summary Judgement in Randazza v. Cox<br /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf" style="text-decoration-line: none;">http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.200.0.pdf</a><br /><br />The Ruling Goes on to Say;<br /><br />"A temporary injunction “should be granted only sparingly and only after the moving party has alleged and proved facts entitling it to relief.” Liberty Fin. Mortg. Corp. v. Clampitt, 667 So. 2d 880, 881 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)."<br /><a href="http://3dca.flcourts.org/Opinions/3D12-3189.op..pdf" style="text-decoration-line: none;">3dca.flcourts.org/Opinions/3D12-3189.op..pdf</a><br /><br />Yet attorney, <b>Plaintiff Marc Randazza proved NO FACTS </b>in Randazza v. Cox and Bernstein, yet he filed gag orders, injunctions, stole blogs, shut down sites, and even redirected my blogs to a post on his blog defaming and lying about me. Why do the courts protect Marc Randazza when he is clearly violating law and the constitutional rights of his victims?<br /><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiHJp0fDB65qonj-hSem8DeEHKd3Yyukrq8TPTvtA_cRUxm8eBylbw-mnR5pnPxAtAd38oEGTmsdYAVpO6mrD_v9Q_GqJeYq6rjZ87m7mrlJ539Tqb2ZPLTa2MBFRdIoz8gWxJ2dBwd6SY/s1600/images+(2).jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: black;"><img border="0" height="126" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiHJp0fDB65qonj-hSem8DeEHKd3Yyukrq8TPTvtA_cRUxm8eBylbw-mnR5pnPxAtAd38oEGTmsdYAVpO6mrD_v9Q_GqJeYq6rjZ87m7mrlJ539Tqb2ZPLTa2MBFRdIoz8gWxJ2dBwd6SY/s1600/images+(2).jpg" style="border: none; padding: 8px; position: relative;" width="320" /></span></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
"In order<b> to establish the right to a temporary injunction</b> the moving party must show: the likelihood of irreparable harm; the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law; the substantial likelihood of success on the merits;</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
the threatened injury to the petitioner outweighs the possible harm to the respondent; and the granting of the temporary injunction will not disserve the public interest. E.g., City of Miami Beach v. Kuoni Destination Mgmt., Inc., 81 So. 3d 530, 532 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012). </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
We review the temporary injunction for an abuse of the trial court’s discretion. Angelino v. Santa Barbara Enters., 2 So. 3d 1100, 1103 (Fla. 3d DCA</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
A. Injunction Against Tortious Interference and Defamatory Blogs Injunctive relief is not available to prohibit the making of defamatory or libelous statements. See, e.g., Vrasic v. Leibel, 106 So. 3d 485, 486 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
A temporary injunction directed to speech is a classic example of prior restraint on speech triggering First Amendment concerns. Id.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
There is, however, a limited exception to the general rule where the defamatory words are made in the furtherance of the commission of another intentional tort. E.g., Murtagh v. Hurley, 40 So. 3d 62 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Zimmerman v. D.C.A. at Welleby, Inc., 505 So. 2d 1371 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). "</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
Source of Ruling</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<a href="http://3dca.flcourts.org/Opinions/3D12-3189.op..pdf" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: black;">3dca.flcourts.org/Opinions/3D12-3189.op..pdf</span></a></div>
<br /><br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b>Yet Plaintiff Marc Randazza was easily GRANTED an unconstitutional preliminary injunction against Blogger Crystal Cox and iViewit inventor Eliot Bernstein, why?</b></div>
<br />Well connected First Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza <b>FLAT OUT lied about me,</b> perjured himself over and over and Judge Gloria Navarro took him at his word and NO PROOF and stole my search engine ranking, my intellectual property, my work product and caused me irreparable harm to myself, my business and my relationships.<br /><br />Here is the <b>Unconstitutional TRO Filing </b> (Randazza Filing)<br /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.2.0.pdf" style="text-decoration-line: none;">http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.2.0.pdf</a><br /><br />Added Flat out Lies to TRO (Randazza Filing)<br /><a href="http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.6.0.pdf" style="text-decoration-line: none;">http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.6.0.pdf</a><br /><br />REPLY with more Lies and Attacks regarding the TRO (Randazza Filing)<br /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.12.0.pdf" style="text-decoration-line: none;">http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.12.0.pdf</a><br /><br />Another REPLY (Randazza Filing)<br /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.28.0.pdf" style="text-decoration-line: none;">http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.28.0.pdf</a><br /><br />ORDER by Judge Gloria Navarro GRANTING Unconstitutional TRO / Motion for Preliminary Injunction against Defendant Blogger Crystal Cox in favor of Marc Randazza.<br /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.14.0.pdf" style="text-decoration-line: none;">http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.14.0.pdf</a><br /><br />Another ORDER by Judge Gloria Navarro GRANTING Unconstitutional TRO / Motion for Preliminary Injunction Just in case the FIRST ONE was not heard.<br /><a href="http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.41.0.pdf" style="text-decoration-line: none;">http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.41.0.pdf</a><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOiywC0Lb6SnhkxIynG6Gq-KtUx-kpXbDgtZX4hvmuwOZmnTgtZIMGT3UUlGd3gap1gSIrxMW4XfqBjSoFKL1GlA_jZzaKMRiwgyLEpw8aQ9Xocbgb_QVCzORg6aNkkRQwuH-hBDuClPs/s1600/download+(1).jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: black;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOiywC0Lb6SnhkxIynG6Gq-KtUx-kpXbDgtZX4hvmuwOZmnTgtZIMGT3UUlGd3gap1gSIrxMW4XfqBjSoFKL1GlA_jZzaKMRiwgyLEpw8aQ9Xocbgb_QVCzORg6aNkkRQwuH-hBDuClPs/s1600/download+(1).jpg" style="border: none; padding: 8px; position: relative;" /></span></a></div>
<br /><br /><b>My, Defendant Crystal Cox's Response and Objection to Unconstitutional TRO / Motion for Preliminary Injunction</b><br /><br />Defendant Crystal Cox's Objection<br /><a href="http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.29.0.pdf" style="text-decoration-line: none;">http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.29.0.pdf</a><br /><br />Defendant Crystal Cox's REPLY to Response<br /><a href="http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.30.0.pdf" style="text-decoration-line: none;">http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.30.0.pdf</a><br /><br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
<b>Randazza et al v. Cox et al</b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
District of Nevada 2:12-cv-02040</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
Cause; 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><b><u>Nature Of Suit: 840 Trademark</u></b></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
1) VIOLATION OF INDIVIDUAL <span style="font-size: 12.8px;">CYBERPIRACY PROTECTIONS</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
– 15 U.S.C. § 8131</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
2) CYBERSQUATTING - 15 U.S.C. §</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
1125(d)</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
3) RIGHT OF PUBLICITY – NRS</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
597.810</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
4) COMMON LAW RIGHT OF</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
PUBLICITY</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
5) COMMON LAW RIGHT OF</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
INTRUSION UPON SECLUSION</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
6) CIVIL CONSPIRACY</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
<b><u>Other Preliminary Injunctions Judge Gloria Navarro Gave Randazza Legal Group</u></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; line-height: 14.56px; text-align: center;">
<b><u>even though they are allegedly "Rare" and Unconstitutional </u></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px; line-height: 14.56px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"><span style="line-height: 14.56px;"><b>"ViaView, Inc. v. Chanson et al"</b></span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.7273px; line-height: 14.56px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.7273px; line-height: 14.56px;">"Court Description: ORDER Granting 6 EX PARTE MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by ViaView, Inc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall have until 12/7/2012 to file Response to 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction.</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.7273px; line-height: 14.56px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.7273px; line-height: 14.56px;">Plaintiff shall file reply by 12/21/2021. Motion Hearing set for 1/2/2013 02:30 PM in LV Courtroom 7D before Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/30/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)"</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.7273px; line-height: 14.56px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.7273px; line-height: 14.56px;">Source</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12.7273px; line-height: 14.56px;"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/nevada/nvdce/2:2012cv01657/90093/10" style="text-decoration-line: none;">law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/nevada/nvdce/2:2012cv01657/90093/10</a></span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjr1YJH9TkzjRdCVy7DYIrq-B1I8DSdHv73qWD1PD2Tmr87rL-NC2Kxt4P_5mDWOjtW2pY32r5b50N7oF2B5iAzz-gwLgskUNuEwNk4mvsAyaO9-9WbCbRVt8K2UaGoFTGQzlb9wLhst70/s1600/CustomStickerMakersFirstAmendment-01.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-decoration-line: none;"><span style="color: black;"><img border="0" height="101" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjr1YJH9TkzjRdCVy7DYIrq-B1I8DSdHv73qWD1PD2Tmr87rL-NC2Kxt4P_5mDWOjtW2pY32r5b50N7oF2B5iAzz-gwLgskUNuEwNk4mvsAyaO9-9WbCbRVt8K2UaGoFTGQzlb9wLhst70/s1600/CustomStickerMakersFirstAmendment-01.png" style="border: none; padding: 8px; position: relative;" width="320" /></span></a></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<b style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;">In SOME Cases, a Preliminary Injunction is Unconstitutional and Marc Randazza DEFENDS that position. Yet he used an unconstitutional Injunction to steal my work product, my intellectual property, my search engine ranking and my online content.</b></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"></span><br /><div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif;"><div style="font-size: 13px;">
Preliminary Injunction are Unconstitutional Depending on Which Side your Attorney is On.</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
Opening Brief in the Irina Chevaldina Appellate Case No. 3D12-3189, Attorney Marc Randazza. </div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiNS1DeFZVdWxJSkU/view?usp=sharing" style="text-decoration-line: none;">https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiNS1DeFZVdWxJSkU/view?usp=sharing</a></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
In the District of Nevada, Judge Gloria Navarro's court, the Most Important thing is the Attorneys Pay Check, and the Law, the Constitutional Rights of Defendants, Due Process seems to be Irrelevant.</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
Judge Gloria Navarro seems to CLEARLY favors Randazza Legal Group as far as I see it.</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
These attorneys sue whoever they want, they get their attorney fees, intellectual property, fines paid to them and what ever they want in the MAGICAL Land La La Lawless Land of Judge Gloria Navarro of District of Nevada. </div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<b><u>More Research Links on that Topic</u></b></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<a href="http://vegasinc.com/news/2011/jul/09/attorneys-seek-fee-injunction-against-righthaven/" style="text-decoration-line: none;">vegasinc.com/news/2011/jul/09/attorneys-seek-fee-injunction-against-righthaven/</a></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<a href="http://vegasinc.com/news/2011/jul/06/righthaven-ordered-pay-defendants-legal-fees/" style="text-decoration-line: none;">vegasinc.com/news/2011/jul/06/righthaven-ordered-pay-defendants-legal-fees/</a></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<b>Liberty Media Holdings LLC v. FF Magnat Limited</b></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/aw.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/nevada/nvdce/2:2012cv01057/88374/38" style="text-decoration-line: none;">aw.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/nevada/nvdce/2:2012cv01057/88374/38</a></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjg-V8ujRF3Tx6sxOHBXs-RDV4IUP3hY7mNsfuK43OqbZeYz_xbcXP1M4Hz5w_2mcFZ4kgfeB2pnrcDJxto6PJWb5PIvHATta_4ZoTe82TYeo46GYEazmDO-rVvnuXmS1ryGfyWlM42rEg/s1600/Freedom+of+Speech+-+megaphone.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-decoration-line: none;"><img border="0" height="251" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjg-V8ujRF3Tx6sxOHBXs-RDV4IUP3hY7mNsfuK43OqbZeYz_xbcXP1M4Hz5w_2mcFZ4kgfeB2pnrcDJxto6PJWb5PIvHATta_4ZoTe82TYeo46GYEazmDO-rVvnuXmS1ryGfyWlM42rEg/s1600/Freedom+of+Speech+-+megaphone.jpg" style="border: none; padding: 8px; position: relative;" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
"The Plaintiff has shown a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its claims sufficient for the Court to issue a limited Temporary Restraining Order. Plaintiff alleges copyright infringement, contributory copyright infringement, vicarious copyright infringement and inducement of copyright infringement. (Compl., ECF No. 1.)<br /><br />To show a substantial likelihood of prevailing on the merits of a copyright infringement claim, Plaintiff must show that: (1) it owns the copyright to which its infringement claims relate; and, (2) Defendants violated one of the Plaintiff's exclusive rights in the works. See Feist Publ'ns, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., Inc., 499 U.S. 340, 361 (1991);<br /><br />Latimer v. Roaring Toyz, Inc., 601 F.3d 1224, 1232-33 (11th Cir. 2010); Sid &amp; Marty Krofft Television Prods., Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 562 F.2d 1157, 1162 (9th Cir 1977); Educational Testing Servs. v. Katzman, 793 F.2d 533, 538 (3d Cir. 1977). These two factors have been clearly established by the Plaintiff."</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
Source of Above Judge Gloria Navarro RULING Favoring the SAME Plaintiff</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<a href="http://nv.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20120621_0003126.DNV.htm/qx" style="text-decoration-line: none;">nv.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20120621_0003126.DNV.htm/qx</a></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<b>Marc Randazza does not and did NOT have "substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its claim". Yet he was favored over his TARGET / his Victims.</b></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
Why is no FBI Agent, Dept. Of Justice Agent, the Nevada Attorney General, or the U.S. Attorney General Looking at all this?</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
It sure seems to VIOLATE the Rights of the Targets, the Defendants in some sort of pattern of "shakedown", in my Opinion</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
More Research on the Liberty Media Holdings LLC v. FF Magnat Limited and this Same Attorney, who sure is GOOD at Showing Alleged "merits" of winning, Before a Defendant has any First Amendment Adjudication or Right to Due Process.</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<a href="http://rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/copyright-lawsuits/nevada-district-court/98475/liberty-media-holdings-llc-v-ff-magnat-limited-et-al/summary/" style="text-decoration-line: none;">rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/copyright-lawsuits/nevada-district-court/98475/liberty-media-holdings-llc-v-ff-magnat-limited-et-al/summary/</a></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEirg7doCYB4eOARk5un7LFGYENlP_E_Rzke0b0lEIQYYm90ZiVkw0ofMFhkCPjWk6ZBPaiL1irZIgfiJAvloU73sqTgjfHkQ_qXD4Dk4MBQriEiUs_YwUVoHvWr1ge9eyTDW-Chufl6Vck/s1600/NoFreeSpeech.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-decoration-line: none;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEirg7doCYB4eOARk5un7LFGYENlP_E_Rzke0b0lEIQYYm90ZiVkw0ofMFhkCPjWk6ZBPaiL1irZIgfiJAvloU73sqTgjfHkQ_qXD4Dk4MBQriEiUs_YwUVoHvWr1ge9eyTDW-Chufl6Vck/s1600/NoFreeSpeech.gif" style="border: none; padding: 8px; position: relative;" width="200" /></a></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<b>Love this Part "Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff Liberty Media Holdings LLC. Motion ripe 6/20/2012."</b></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
I get threats of death, violence and Judge Gloria Navarro IGNORES my Real Emergency. Yet Gloria Navarro allows Randazza Legal Group to abuse the process and get emergency protective orders and Injunctions.</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
Frozen Accounts, Preliminary Injunctions, FORCED Attorney Fees and whatever Randazza Legal Group wants they get, WHY?</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<a href="http://scribd.com/doc/105188141/Liberty-Media-Holdings-v-FF-Magnat" style="text-decoration-line: none;">scribd.com/doc/105188141/Liberty-Media-Holdings-v-FF-Magnat</a></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
"Section 505 of the Copyright Act grants district courts discretion to award “</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
a reasonable attorney's fee to the prevailing party as part of the costs"</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<b>Randazza Legal Group sues their TARGET,</b> and the Judge Forces their VICTIM to PAY the ATTORNEYS outrageous Fee's. And if you Don't Judge Gloria Navarro will Freeze your Accounts. Pattern and History, I THINK SO.. in my NON-Attorney OPINION.</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
Don't Forget Liberty Media Holdings allegedly is infringing on the iViewit Technology and many companies owned, at least in part by Liberty Media Holdings are named in iViewit Technology. Randazza SUED Eliot Bernstein and got a Preliminary Injunction against him as well, with NO First Amendment Adjudication.</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<b>The Full Hypocritical Filing of Marc Randazza Regarding the </b></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<b>Unconstitutional actions of Preliminary Injunctions.</b></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiT3M2c1FVbHZqX2c/edit" style="text-decoration-line: none;"><b>docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiT3M2c1FVbHZqX2c/edit</b></a></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
Page 8 of above;</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
"This appeal Seeks to cure an<b> unlawful prior restraint</b> on the Appellant’s First Amendment rights, improperly imposed by the lower court. On November 19, 2012, the circuit court enjoined Appellant from writing, “defamatory” blogs 'in the future, despite expressly making “no findings of facts as to actual ‘violations of law by the [Appellants], except that [Appellants] have blogged extensively about the Appellee] and many of these blogs are arguably defamatory.” (RÃ/14)</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
The circuit court made this decision Without following the mandates of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610. However, even if it had, the injunction is patently unconstitutional."</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
WOW, <b>"the injunction is patently unconstitutional", it is "unlawful prior restraint", EXCEPT for when Marc Randazza uses it against a Blogger he wants to SUPPRESS the SPEECH of.</b></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
Page 10</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
"Months and months of litigation, thousands of dollars, and thousands of pages of documents later, RKA sought a <b>clearly unconstitutional remedy</b> - an <b>injunction against alleged defamation prior to any court determination</b> that the speech at issue was even legally capable of defamatory meaning, much less Whether it was actually defamatory, privileged, or otherwise protected by the First Amendment. (R Vl-6)</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
The resulting lnjunction Order was so over-broad and subject to abuse, that the RKA even sought an order for contempt based upon Chevaldina doing no more than reporting the existence of the Order itself."</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<b>All that money to seek a "clearly unconstitutional remedy"? And Marc Randazza defends the opposite position he took to constitutionally violate Crystal Cox an Eliot Bernstein?</b></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
Full Hypocritical Motion Linked Below</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<a href="http://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiT3M2c1FVbHZqX2c/edit" style="text-decoration-line: none;">docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiT3M2c1FVbHZqX2c/edit</a></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
Attorney Marc Randazza sought a <b>"clearly unconstitutional remedy , "injunction ..prior to any court determination" </b>from Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein, even though that "speech" was protected under the First Amendment and with NO First Amendment Adjudication. </div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
Randazza Legal Group, Marc Randazza stole massive online content, work product, intellectual property and used the lawsuit to violate my privacy rights, harass me, defame me, lie about me, harass me and to post private emails, get my bank account and wire records, harass and bully my church, threaten my ex's, get private proprietary business information from customers and clients and to put me and my sources under constant attack, threats, stalking, harassing, bullying and defaming for over 2 years now and counting. He did this as an <b>"officer of the court"</b>. Clearly abusing his power.</div>
<div style="font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgj1LSl6QnQqjIdF4mXgLnytrjrG5EukqR7nIvB-rxDq-KfsvavzboJTIKmiT6QAQK-gC2jzZZfxcftyezWWCzJnGSsL_wvLOWAN4ejnLcTasPrmDnVQBUWjqKZWMZ5Z-X4gob6ZOC3Tjg/s1600/images+(1).jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-decoration-line: none;"><img border="0" height="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgj1LSl6QnQqjIdF4mXgLnytrjrG5EukqR7nIvB-rxDq-KfsvavzboJTIKmiT6QAQK-gC2jzZZfxcftyezWWCzJnGSsL_wvLOWAN4ejnLcTasPrmDnVQBUWjqKZWMZ5Z-X4gob6ZOC3Tjg/s1600/images+(1).jpg" style="border: none; padding: 8px; position: relative;" width="400" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group are</div>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">CLEARLY acting outside of the Law and are Violating</span><br style="font-size: 13px;" /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
the rights of citizens every single day.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
And they are using Judges, Attorneys, </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
Investigators, Officers of the Court, and Thugs to do it,</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
in my Opinion.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><b>EXPOSE Randazza Legal Group.</b></span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
</span></div>
</div>
<br />
Originally Posted at<br />
<a href="http://marcrandazzalied.blogspot.com/2014/12/first-amendment-attorney-marc-randazza.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: black;">http://marcrandazzalied.blogspot.com/2014/12/first-amendment-attorney-marc-randazza.html</span></a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-20478914902880706022017-10-24T20:16:00.000-07:002017-10-24T20:16:20.365-07:00Pro Se Litigant Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox Pokes a BIT of FUN at the OUTBREAK of Preliminary Injunctions, Sweeping Rapidly, Seemingly Out of Control, through the District of Nevada, yet Granny Goose Alleges these RULINGS are an "extraordinary remedy". Crystal Cox Calls BULLSHIT. ViaView , Inc. Plaintiff v. BLUE MIST MEDIA; ERIC S. CHANSON; KEVIN C. BOLLAERT; CODY ALVIAR; ROY E. CHANSON; and AMY L. CHANSON ~ Randazza V. Cox, Who Will be NEXT?"<br />
<br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<b>"EXTRAORDINARY" Preliminary Injunction OUTBREAK in the District of Nevada</b></div>
<br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: xx-small;">written upon the Knowledge and Belief of Crystal Cox, Mad Dog Blogger</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
Judge Gloria Navarro GRANTS<b style="text-align: center;"> Preliminary Injunction </b><span style="text-align: center;">to </span>Plaintiff ViaView , Inc. , and says, regarding a list of domain names WANTED by the PLAINTIFF, "shall be immediately locked by the Registrar and/or its successor registrars and transferred to Plaintiff ViaView, Inc" (gee WHERE have I heard that Before?)</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
Source of Above QUOTE</div>
<a href="http://bv.1110.cds.contentcolo.net/uploads/files/TRO_Chanson.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-decoration-line: none;">http://bv.1110.cds.contentcolo.net/uploads/files/TRO_Chanson.pdf</a><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">It is not Standard of Practice in the Domain Name Industry for a PLAINTIFF to simply say, </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #990000; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><b>hey I want your website down</b></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">, I want you to Shut up and STOP competing with me so I will SIMPLY sue you, and get a JUDGE to give me </span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">the <span style="color: #990000;">" extraordinary remedy"</span></b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> of "</span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">Preliminary Injunction" </b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">and just shut you down,<b> FORCEFULLY</b> by Court order, oh and make you pay my attorney fees to do it.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><br /></b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">That would mean that anyone at any time can sue who ever they want, and then get a JUDGE like, </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Judge Gloria Navarro of the District of Nevada, </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">to grant them a </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">"</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">Preliminary Injunction" and WaLa the competition is SHUT DOWN, Gone, Erased, in an instant and before due process of law, before Trademark Rights are Proven and Before First Amendment Adjudication. This is an unlawful, unconstitutional measure to wipe out competing blogs and websites, and I believe an Anti-Trust Violation.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><br /></span><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiINWBOLUne9ZR52qi06Czp5BQEorYB5icw_zvEOjDnCH_i1iDGa2le1M_6t2RDdN8eS__zpXjHO_OlJojG1x71Nz4d5jCCoVKFp-khxz6Su0z93DgPfTas6R90a5J7auEtDp1N4B1XPhEJ/s1600/Marc+J.+Randazza,+Marc+Randazza.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="background-color: white; clear: left; color: blue; float: left; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em; text-decoration-line: none;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiINWBOLUne9ZR52qi06Czp5BQEorYB5icw_zvEOjDnCH_i1iDGa2le1M_6t2RDdN8eS__zpXjHO_OlJojG1x71Nz4d5jCCoVKFp-khxz6Su0z93DgPfTas6R90a5J7auEtDp1N4B1XPhEJ/s1600/Marc+J.+Randazza,+Marc+Randazza.jpg" style="background: rgb(34, 34, 34); border-radius: 0px; border: 1px solid transparent; box-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2) 0px 0px 0px; padding: 8px; position: relative;" /></a><span style="background-color: white; color: #990000; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><b> Do Domain Names Have First Amendment Protection?</b></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><b><br /></b></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><b>Do Free Blogs Such as Blogspot by GOOGLE have First Amendment Protection.</b></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
<span style="text-align: center;">The District of Nevada is Doing this Preliminary Injunction Scheme, in Randazza V. Cox, and and the ViaView case. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
<span style="text-align: center;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
<span style="text-align: center;">Alleged Co-Conspirators of </span><span style="line-height: 18px; text-align: center;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><a href="http://www.crystalcox.com/2013/02/pro-se-litigant-investigative-blogger.html" style="color: blue; font-weight: bold; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-NJK</a><b> </b>are also doing this same, alleged "scheme" to just take websites and blogs with no due process, no first amendment Adjudication in <b>Manwin V. Bulgin, (</b></span></span><span style="line-height: 21.9886px;"><b><a href="http://stateofnevadacase212-cv-02040-gmn-pal.blogspot.com/2013/01/nicholas-bulgin-fight-back-know-your.html" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">Manwin V. Bulgin, Manwin Licensing International Sarl v. Nicholas Bulgin</a>)</b>, <a href="http://dockets.justia.com/docket/california/cacdce/2:2012cv02484/527625/" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">2:2012cv02484 of California Central District Cour</a>t. </span><span style="line-height: 21.9886px;">Manwin V. Bulgin was filed nearly a year ago, part of the <b>"conspiracy" "scheme"</b> seems to be to simply SHUT the site down and then stall a Judgement or Ruling, all to SIMPLY wipe out the competition, and GIVE their Intellectual Property to the Plaintiff just because they said so.</span></div>
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">They are connected and seem to be on a <b>domain name Seizing Spree</b>, using the courts as their <b>private playground and media</b> and stomping on the rights of the intellectual property owners such as, Crystal L. Cox, Eliot Bernstein, Nicholas Bulgin, BLUE MIST MEDIA; ERIC S. CHANSON; KEVIN C. BOLLAERT; CODY ALVIAR; ROY E. CHANSON; and AMY L. CHANSON.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">Search Engine Reputation Management Services cost 5,000 to 10,000 a month with </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">Search Engine Reputation Management, SEO Companies, and this is often per key word. GET a BID. Yet Manwin, Randazza, Liberty Media, ViaView, they seem to have a SUPER Power and instead of paying for internet advertising or SEO,<b><span style="color: #990000;"> they just SUE and get a JUDGE to seize the domain name, blog, or website that competes with them</span></b> in the search engines, and they have WON with no due process to their MARK aKa "the Defendant".</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">Manwin, Liberty Media Holdings, Corbin Fisher, and more alleged Co-Conspirators named in the Crystal Cox RICO Filing, are infringing on the iViewit Technology and trying to Suppress the Flow of information on the Blogs of Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, a Media Defendant in Randazza V. Cox and in Obsidian V. Cox. </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">the iViewit Technology infringement is Billions in Liability to Randazza Client Liberty Media Alone, the MOTIVE to shut down the Blogs of Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox and Invent, iViewit Founder, Eliot Bernstein is Clear to Anyone who Can READ.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">Godaddy and other Domain Name Registrars sell Domain Names with the names of others in them every day, yet the, in conspiracy it seems, the <b><span style="color: #990000;">end user fights the legal battle over owning domain names Godaddy SOLD them</span></b> and Godaddy made "commercial" revenue, "intentionally", "in bad faith", over the sale of the domain name, and of ads on the domain names when parked at Godaddy. yet GODADDY has no Liability, Pro Se Plaintiff in the Crystal Cox RICO Filing, ME, says Different. I Say Godaddy Inc. is part of this RICO and should be accountable to their clients.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><b> Jerry Falwell Lost the Right to JerryFalwell.com</b></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.internetparodies.org/FalwellDecision.pdf" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.internetparodies.org/FalwellDecision.pdf</a></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">"making "a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name, without intent for</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">commercial gain to misleadingly divert consumers or to tarnish the trademark . . . at issue." Policy, paragraph 4(c)(iii).</span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> The fact that the trademark is used in the domain name does not in and of itself defeat the legitimate noncommercial fair use of the trademark in question.</b><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Bruce Springsteen v. Jeff Burgar</b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> and Bruce Springsteen Club, WIPO Case No. D2000-1532 (January 25, 2001). Nor does initial interest confusion affect the legitimate noncommercial fair use of the trademark. See, e.g., Strick Corp. v. Strickland, 162 F. Supp. 2d 372, 377 (E.D. Pa. 2001). The dissenting panelist takes the view that the intended impersonation of another can rarely if ever be fair or legitimate and particularly in circumstances where the Complainant’s name has been taken without adornment and where the purpose behind the impersonation of the person in question is to damage him. In the view of the dissenting panelist the fact that the unsuspecting visitor to the Respondent's web site is immediately disabused is irrelevant. By then the damage has been done. The visitor has been misleadingly diverted, and the Complainant has been damaged.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Complainant argues that the use being made of the name does not fall within the</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">definition of </span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">"parody"</b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> However, whether regarded as parody, satire, or critical</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">commentary, the majority believes that legitimate noncommercial fair use commentary</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">is involved. Whether the commentary is in good taste, whether it is funny, whether it is</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">effective, all is beside the point. See, e.g., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. </span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">WalMartcanadasucks.com</b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> and Kenneth J. Harvey, WIPO Case No. D2000-1104</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">(November 23, 2000), at 18-19."</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Source of Above Quote</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><a href="http://www.internetparodies.org/FalwellDecision.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.internetparodies.org/FalwellDecision.pdf</a><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<b>More on Sucks Sites and the Manwin V. Buglin Case</b></div>
<a href="http://stateofnevadacase212-cv-02040-gmn-pal.blogspot.com/2013/01/nicholas-bulgin-fight-back-know-your.html" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-decoration-line: none;">http://stateofnevadacase212-cv-02040-gmn-pal.blogspot.com/2013/01/nicholas-bulgin-fight-back-know-your.html</a><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">Anna Nicole Smith LOST</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><a href="http://www.adrforum.com/domains/decisions/220007.htm" id="yui_3_7_2_18_1362155095524_250" style="background-color: white; color: blue; cursor: text !important; font-family: tahoma, "new york", times, serif; font-size: 16.3636px; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.adrforum.com/domains/decisions/220007.htm</a><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">We all know that the ABOVE people were and actually still are "household" names. Manwin is NOT, Randazza is NOT, ViaView - anyBodyUpyet, is NOT, yet they have <b>SUPER Powers over the Courts</b> to Simply Seize businesses, blogs, competing web properties, with a simple filing of a law suit and filing for an Unconstitutional Preliminary Injunction, TRO, which they seem to EASILY get, though they are ALLEGED to be an "extraordinary remedy".</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">Taubman Sucks Won</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><a href="http://taubmansucks.com/" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none;">http://taubmansucks.com/</a></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><a href="https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSzBEkZHzgrggmYqnN1_SwqJq6Y3JNvlymjVeUFcU-Xw7GRYBuL" imageanchor="1" style="background-color: white; clear: right; color: blue; float: right; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em; text-decoration-line: none;"><img border="0" src="https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSzBEkZHzgrggmYqnN1_SwqJq6Y3JNvlymjVeUFcU-Xw7GRYBuL" style="background: rgb(34, 34, 34); border-radius: 0px; border: 1px solid transparent; box-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2) 0px 0px 0px; padding: 8px; position: relative;" /></a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><br /></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><b><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1hGqg360NF4" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">Glen Beck Domain Name Case</a> </b></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">HE LOST, Randazza was Opposing Counsel</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">Here is Randazza Letter Regarding Glen Beck Name (yet this same Attorney SUED me and STOLE my Domain Names and BLOGS)<br /><a href="http://www.docstoc.com/docs/128343966/Marc-J-Randazza-Responds-to-Glen-Beck-WIPO" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.docstoc.com/docs/128343966/Marc-J-Randazza-Responds-to-Glen-Beck-WIPO</a><br /><br />More Documents in the Glen Beck Case<br /><a href="http://www.dmlp.org/threats/beck-v-eiland-hall" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.dmlp.org/threats/beck-v-eiland-hall</a></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">Randazza Defends SUCKS Sites and talks of Glen Beck Case</span><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=1hGqg360NF" id="yui_3_7_2_18_1362155095524_224" style="background-color: white; color: blue; cursor: text !important; font-family: tahoma, "new york", times, serif; font-size: 13px; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1hGqg360NF</a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: tahoma, "new york", times, serif; font-size: 13px;">4</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">As does the Book, What would Google Do. Yet Randazza SEIZES the "Sucks" sites of Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox, his target, victims, aKa Defendant and gets a Judge to GRANT </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"> </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">an <b><span style="color: #990000;">Unconstitutional Preliminary</span></b> Injunction, TRO, and simply STOPS the flow of information, STOPS Competition, and interferes with the Business as well as ruins the reputations of their TARGET, the owners of the sites, blogs, they want DOWN, that are competing with them in the Search Engines. A $350 filing fee is a lot cheaper then a $500 WIPO Fee, and to actually do the work of getting strong in the search engines. These Serial Plaintiffs simply file a lawsuit, Get a Preliminary Injunctions, the Domain Names are transferred to the Plaintiff because the say so, and Game Over. No Rights for the Defendant aKa Target.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: medium; text-align: center;"><b> the New York Joseph Rakofsky Case</b></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"></span><br />
<div class="yiv1120415237yui_3_7_2_18_1362155095524_57 yiv1120415237yui_3_7_2_18_1362155095524_214 yiv1120415237yui_3_7_2_18_1362155095524_239" id="yui_3_7_2_1_1362184642700_2986" style="background-color: white; font-family: tahoma, "new york", times, serif; font-size: 12pt;">
Rakofsky V. the Internet Case, Same Gang Involved, a Related Case, Looks Like to Me</div>
<div class="yiv1120415237yui_3_7_2_18_1362155095524_57 yiv1120415237yui_3_7_2_18_1362155095524_214 yiv1120415237yui_3_7_2_18_1362155095524_239" id="yui_3_7_2_1_1362184642700_2985" style="background-color: white; font-family: tahoma, "new york", times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
<a href="http://www.dmlp.org/threats/rakofsky-v-internet#description" id="yui_3_7_2_1_1362184642700_2984" rel="nofollow" style="color: #2862c5; outline: 0px; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">http://www.dmlp.org/threats/rakofsky-v-internet#description</a></div>
<br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: tahoma, "new york", times, serif; font-size: 16.3636px;">Rakofsky V. the Internet, Naming </span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2011-05-11-Rakofsky%20Complaint.pdf" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2011-05-11-Rakofsky%20Complaint.pdf</a></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><br /></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<b>WIPO Decisions WON By Crystal Cox with "Neutral" Panelist(S)</b></div>
<br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><a href="http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2011-0675" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2011-0675</a><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><a href="http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2011-0678" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2011-0678</a><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><a href="http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2011-0677" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2011-0677</a><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><a href="http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2011-0679" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2011-0679</a><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">They ( the Alleged Co-Conspirators) are SEIZING web properties in <b>"conspiracy"</b> and setting precedence to take massive intellectual property and completely bypassing the constitutional rights and rights of due process of those they sue, <b><span style="color: #990000;">YOU are NEXT</span></b>. </span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">"They" sue these victims partly in Retaliation for beating them in the Search Engines. And partly to STOP the blog author from giving their OPINION, Exercising their Free Speech about them, or exposing their actions, the Plaintiff, or their Client. However, Search Engines ALSO have protected Speech, check out this white paper on the topic.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.volokh.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/SearchEngineFirstAmendment.pdf" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.volokh.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/SearchEngineFirstAmendment.pdf</a></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">It is not Standard of Practice, or lawful in my opinion, for ANYONE to simply say </span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Hey, your bugging me</b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> with </span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">your online speech about me or my company,</b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> so I want your sites, and then have a JUDGE simply shut the sites down, change servers and transfer domain ownership, without due process of law. </span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><span style="color: #990000;">Your life's work, money, time, quality of life all in the hands of ONE JUDGE.</span></b><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">If JUDGES can do this then you are all DOOMED and may as well quit online business and marketing right now. If a Judge, such as Judge Gloria Navarro of the District of Nevada, can take your business, your revenue, your online presence, your intellectual property and simply wipe it out for an unspecified amount of time until a case is litigated, then SOMETHING is very wrong, and this needs to be looked at by Special Investigators.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">THE Preliminary Injunction in ViaView , Inc. Plaintiff v. BLUE MIST MEDIA; ERIC S. CHANSON; KEVIN C. BOLLAERT; CODY ALVIAR; ROY E. CHANSON; and AMY L. CHANSON and the Preliminary Injunction in Randazza V. Cox, are Unconstitutional, as RANDAZZA himself argued in this case</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><a href="http://www.docstoc.com/docs/141369776/State-of-Nevada-Case-212-cv-02040-GMN-PAL-in-Connection-to-Irina-Chevaldina-Appellant-Appellate-Case-No-3D12-3189" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.docstoc.com/docs/141369776/State-of-Nevada-Case-212-cv-02040-GMN-PAL-in-Connection-to-Irina-Chevaldina-Appellant-Appellate-Case-No-3D12-3189</a><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<b><span style="color: #990000;">LOOKS like RANDAZZA Agrees and Preliminary Injunction are "Unconstitutional"</span></b></div>
<br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Does the First Amendment Trump Trademark Laws in ViaView , Inc. Plaintiff v. BLUE MIST MEDIA; ERIC S. CHANSON; KEVIN C. BOLLAERT; CODY ALVIAR; ROY E. CHANSON; and AMY L. CHANSON?</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Does the Plaintiff actually have a Trademark in ViaView , Inc. Plaintiff v. BLUE MIST MEDIA; ERIC S. CHANSON; KEVIN C. BOLLAERT; CODY ALVIAR; ROY E. CHANSON; and AMY L. CHANSON?</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">It does not SEEM to matter, an Unconstitutional, </span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">"EXTRAORDINARY"</b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> Preliminary Injunction will SIMPLY be </span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">the JUDGE and JURY</b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> and Due Process, Constitutional Rights, First Amendment Adjudication is OF No Concern, as Long as you have </span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><span style="color: #990000;">the RIGHT Judge and the RIGHT Attorney.</span></b><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><span style="color: #990000;"><br /></span></b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Upon my Knowledge and belief and as a "Domainer" and Internet Marker for over a Decade, I allege, that Judge Gloria Navarro SHOULD not have deemed that blogs, domains, intellectual property of BLUE MIST MEDIA; ERIC S. CHANSON; KEVIN C. BOLLAERT; CODY ALVIAR; ROY E. CHANSON; and AMY L. CHANSON or of Defendant Crystal Cox in Randazza V. Cox, were </span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">ONLY worth $100 each</b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Judge Gloria Navarro is not a domain name, blog, internet marketing expert or appraisor and had no lawful or constitutional right to wipe out my work, my business simply because the Plaintiff told her too, and the Plaintiff in Randazza v. Cox is also the Plaintiffs Attorney in ViaView , Inc. Plaintiff v. BLUE MIST MEDIA; ERIC S. CHANSON; KEVIN C. BOLLAERT; CODY ALVIAR; ROY E. CHANSON; and AMY L. CHANSON.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">The Plaintiff's Attorney in ViaView , Inc. Plaintiff v. BLUE MIST MEDIA is a Domain Name Expert and knows full well that those "brands" domain are worth more than $100. Judge Gloria Navarro SHOULD know, as she, upon my knowledge and belief, was part of the Litigation over the Righthaven Domain Name being FORCED into Receivership. The same receiver that ALLEGED Co-Conspirator David S. Aman used to come after Crystal L. Cox and Eliot Bernstein in the Obsidian V. Cox Case, Lara Pearson.</span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<b>The Righthaven Domain Name Auction and Attorney Fee Dispute</b></div>
<br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">"A judge has authorized a receiver to auction the intellectual property of Las Vegas-based Righthaven LLC, the newspaper copyright infringement lawsuit filer.T he auction is aimed at raising money to cover part of Righthaven’s $63,720 debt to a man who defeated Righthaven in court. "</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">"The court-appointed receiver in the Hoehn case, Lara Pearson of the law firm Rimon P.C., in the meantime, arranged for Righthaven’s website domain name to be auctioned beginning today by SnapNames.com.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">With a minimum initial required bid of $100, by midmorning Monday the auction had attracted two bids that pushed the price up to $300. The bidding will continue through Jan. 6 at 12:15 p.m. PST."</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">"One of Hoehn’s attorneys, Marc Randazza, on Monday noted the irony of Righthaven’s lawsuits in which it demanded alleged copyright infringers turn their website domain names over to Righthaven and the company now seeing its domain name auctioned.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8N9yPZWDdgNnHzhgT4IctvBDUWxvBdxgWlC6-1o-Ag28A97a_l4Az9G16nFTtl7zZZOkg377NTQv6_jkyqZp_qGqziSMcfB3m-93qfbtPoo6o0F6fpOTrwGZf6AMQWQ1h3ZqW8LqIJyjk/s1600/culture_of_corruption.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="background-color: white; clear: right; color: blue; float: right; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em; text-decoration-line: none;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8N9yPZWDdgNnHzhgT4IctvBDUWxvBdxgWlC6-1o-Ag28A97a_l4Az9G16nFTtl7zZZOkg377NTQv6_jkyqZp_qGqziSMcfB3m-93qfbtPoo6o0F6fpOTrwGZf6AMQWQ1h3ZqW8LqIJyjk/s320/culture_of_corruption.jpg" style="background: rgb(34, 34, 34); border-radius: 0px; border: 1px solid transparent; box-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2) 0px 0px 0px; padding: 8px; position: relative;" /></a><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">“Righthaven went after hundreds of defendants in copyright cases. Often, the defendants were innocent and engaged in fair use. In all cases where a court has been asked, they found that Righthaven had no right to bring the suit in the first place. In all of their cases, Righthaven asked the court to award them not only money, but the defendant’s domain name,” Randazza noted in a blog post. “After losing a case to my client, Wayne Hoehn, Righthaven is at least $63,000 in debt to him. They refuse to pay. Now their domain name is up for auction to the highest bidder.”</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Source of The Above Quote</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><a href="http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/dec/26/auction-righthaven-website-domain-name-under-way/" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/dec/26/auction-righthaven-website-domain-name-under-way/</a><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><b>"Righthaven Wrangles Over Legal Fees; Hit with New Charges, 'Just a Gang of Con Artists'"</b></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><span style="line-height: 20px;">New developments occurred this week in the </span><a href="http://righthavenvictims.blogspot.com/2011/07/righthaven-ordered-to-pay-attorneys.html" style="color: blue; line-height: 20px; text-decoration-line: none;">ongoing dispute of attorney's fees</a><span style="line-height: 20px;"> in the case against former defendant Michael Leon. On July 5, </span><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/59404506/Ordered-to-Pay-Attorney-s-Fees-Righthaven-v-Michael-Leon" style="color: blue; line-height: 20px; text-decoration-line: none;">U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro's ordered Righthaven</a><span style="line-height: 20px;"> to pay attorney Malcolm DeVoy and Randazza Legal Group $3,815 for representing Leon on a pro bono basis. Righthaven allegedly balked at the order, so on Saturday the Randazza firm asked for an</span><a href="http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/jul/09/attorneys-seek-fee-injunction-against-righthaven/" style="color: blue; line-height: 20px; text-decoration-line: none;">injunction against Righthaven</a><span style="line-height: 20px;">, freezing $3,815 of its assets to ensure payment. On Tuesday, Righthaven responded by asking Navarro to </span><a href="http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/jul/12/righthaven-litigating-over-defendants-fees-hit-new/" style="color: blue; line-height: 20px; text-decoration-line: none;">temporarily stay judgment of the fee award</a><span style="line-height: 20px;">.<br /><br /><span style="font-size: 14px;">Source of Above QUOTE</span></span></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;"><span style="color: #666666; font-size: xx-small;"><a href="http://www.righthavenvictims.com/2011/07/righthaven-wrangles-over-legal-fees-hit.html" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.righthavenvictims.com/2011/07/righthaven-wrangles-over-legal-fees-hit.html</a></span></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; clear: right; float: right; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: medium;"><b> ARE you Kidding ME</b>?</span></div>
<br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Randazza Legal Group offers Pro Bono Services,<br />then files a MOTION to be PAID, </span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #990000; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><b>SHOCKER.</b></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Judge Gloria Navarro Says<b> "GRANTED"</b></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #990000; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><b>EVEN BIGGER SHOCKER. </b></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">"</span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Attorney J. Malcolm DeVoy IV was retained by Defendant Leon for the April 20, 2011hearing. Mr. DeVoy is an attorney for the Randazza Legal group and </span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">rendered his services toDefendant Leon on a pro bono basis</b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">. Mr. DeVoy was able to secure Mr. Leon’s Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. Mr. DeVoy now presents the current motion for attorney’s fees and costs for his services in securing the dismissal. "</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">"Plaintiff opposes any attorney’s fees being awarded to Mr. DeVoy or Randazza LegalGroup because it was Plaintiff counsel’s understanding that any award of attorney’s fees would be directed to a charitable organization since Mr. DeVoy was representing Defendant Leon on a pro bono basis."</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">"The Court finds that </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #990000; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><b>it would be appropriate to award attorney’s fees to</b></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #990000; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><b>the lawfirm in light of the pro bono representation</b></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> of Defendant Leon.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">(denying attorney’s fees would discourage pro bono representation).</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Source of Quote</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/59404506/Ordered-to-Pay-Attorney-s-Fees-Righthaven-v-Michael-Leon" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.scribd.com/doc/59404506/Ordered-to-Pay-Attorney-s-Fees-Righthaven-v-Michael-Leon</a><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">So, of course, <b>in light of "Pro Bono" representation,</b> a JUDGE would <b>GRANT the ATTORNEY to be PAID by the party they REPRESENTED Pro BONO, Right</b>? Makes Perfect Sense... NOT !! See, if the ATTORNEY does not get paid, they may not want to DO Pro BONO work anymore... WHAT? </span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><b><span style="color: #990000; font-size: medium;">RED ALERT Folks,</span></b> what a RACKET, Randazza Legal Group OFFERS Pro Bono then FORCES you to Pay Them? <b>WOWZER.. </b></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">I Say, DO Not Accept Pro Bono Services from Riddler Randazza LEGAL Lies Group, Cuz that Actually Means they will get their BUDDY </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Judge Gloria Navarro to MAKE you Pay THEM after you agree to PRO BONO.. . Another Randazza Legal Group RACKET </span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><span style="color: #990000;">Subsidized by COURT RULINGS</span></b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> of Judge Gloria Navarro...</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Pro Bono is defined as, "for the public good; is a Latin phrase for professional work undertaken voluntarily and without payment or at a reduced fee" <b>BUT not in the Fantasy Land, of the Magic Kingdom of Randazza RULES.</b></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><b><br /></b></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><b>Case No.: 2:10-cv-01672-GMN-LRL, Document 52</b></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/59404506/Ordered-to-Pay-Attorney-s-Fees-Righthaven-v-Michael-Leon" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.scribd.com/doc/59404506/Ordered-to-Pay-Attorney-s-Fees-Righthaven-v-Michael-Leon</a></span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Interesting, Rabid ROTTEN </span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Randazza was to be Pro Bono for me too, but he wanted $5000 of course to Start.. that Pro Bono work.. (</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #990000; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><b>things that make you say hmmm</b></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">....)</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<b style="background-color: transparent;">Why does Judge Gloria Navarro SUPPORT Randazza Legal Group in </b></div>
<b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"></b><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<b>whatever they Say they WANT? And Call It FACT?</b></div>
<b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"></b><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<b>Regardless of the Evidence an Innocent Defendant,<br />Such as Me Gives the Court, in which she rules over?</b></div>
<b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"></b><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<b><span style="color: #990000;">Quite a "Racket", I would Say, In My Pro Se Opinion.</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
Let's Rant a Bit on This <b><span style="color: blue;">Injunctive Relief Epidemic</span></b> that seems to be spreading randazza rapidly through the District of Nevada, though it is ALLEGED to be a RARE and<b> <span style="font-size: medium;">"extraordinary remedy".</span></b></div>
<br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">"“Injunctive relief [is] an extraordinary remedy that may only be awarded upon a clear showing that the plaintiff is entitled to such relief.” Id. at 22. Above all, a temporary restraining order “should be restricted to serving [its] underlying purpose of preserving the status quo and preventing irreparable harm just so long as is necessary to hold a hearing, and no longer.” Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Bhd. of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers Local No. 70, 415 U.S. 423, 439 (1974)."</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Source of Quote</b><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><a href="http://bv.1110.cds.contentcolo.net/uploads/files/TRO_Chanson.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-decoration-line: none;">http://bv.1110.cds.contentcolo.net/uploads/files/TRO_Chanson.pdf</a><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Judge Gloria Navarro sure seems to LOVE this One, she used this "EXTRAORDINARY" Granny Goose case law on Pro Se Litigant Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox as well.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #990000; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">If it is going to Cost the End User Hundreds of THOUSANDS of DOLLARS and Forced Attorney Fees to own a domain name with an "Alleged" Trademark In it, then why the HELL does the Registrar SELLING these Domain Names have NO LIABILITY?</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">If you Look at Judge Gloria Navarro GRANTING this </span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">"extraordinary remedy"</b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> for a Preliminary Injunction in ViaView , Inc. Plaintiff v. BLUE MIST MEDIA; ERIC S. CHANSON; KEVIN C. BOLLAERT; CODY ALVIAR; ROY E. CHANSON; and AMY L. CHANSON.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><a href="http://bv.1110.cds.contentcolo.net/uploads/files/TRO_Chanson.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-decoration-line: none;">http://bv.1110.cds.contentcolo.net/uploads/files/TRO_Chanson.pdf</a><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Then You Look at Judge Gloria Navarro GRANTING this </span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">"extraordinary remedy"</b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> for a Preliminary Injunction in </span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Randazza V. Cox</b><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><b style="background-color: white; color: #0f0e0c; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.docstoc.com/docs/146014867/District-of-Nevada-Docket-Entry-14-Regarding-TRO-Preliminary-Injunction" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: initial;">http://www.docstoc.com/docs/146014867/District-of-Nevada-Docket-Entry-14-Regarding-TRO-Preliminary-Injunction</a></b><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">You BEGIN to wonder just how </span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">"EXTRAORDINARY"</b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> Preliminary Injunctions REALLY are in the District of Nevada Court of Judge Gloria Navarro ? they Sure look like ORDINARY, Every Day Activities to Me, and they ALMOST look word for word, as if a Cookie Cutter Stamp. So how "EXTRAORDINARY" can they be?</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">MAYBE the Plaintiff / Plaintiff's ATTORNEY submitted a Template.. oh I am just Kidding of Course.. Geez that could never happen.. .. However, WOW.. </span><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">"extraordinary remedy", sorry But I have to Call BULLSHIT on that One. </b><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br /></b><b style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">How in the WORLD can </b><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Judge Gloria Navarro SEIZE Domain Names, cause irreparable damage and Transfer domain names to a Plaintiff in a motion that clearly states the Defendant has not yet responded or had due process of law, and in more then one case as you see here, WORD FOR WORD.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><a href="http://bv.1110.cds.contentcolo.net/uploads/files/TRO_Chanson.pdf" style="background-color: white; color: blue; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-decoration-line: none;">http://bv.1110.cds.contentcolo.net/uploads/files/TRO_Chanson.pdf</a><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">AND to the Benefit of the SAME Law Firm, the Same Lawyer. This is WHY I allege conspiracy, this is why I have tried so hard to remove Judge Gloria Navarro from my case.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">And of COURSE been BLOCKED Every Single Time, thus far.</span><br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-size: medium;">Ok a Bit More Pokin' Fun.. </span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-size: medium;">Come on Now, it's Just a Parody.. </span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<h3 class="post-title entry-title" itemprop="name" style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 22px; font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; margin: 0px; position: relative;">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: blue;">The KING of Abuse on the Courts. </span></span></div>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="color: blue;">Pot Calls Kettle Black. Nevada Righthaven Scandal</span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Randazza Righthaven SuperHERO? NOT..<br /><br />I Believe, in my OPINION, that Rotten Rabid Riddler Randazza<br />played BOTH Sides of the RIGHTHAVEN Lawsuits,</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
just my opinion, surely I am blowin' it out my Ass on that one, right?</div>
</span></h3>
<div class="post-header" style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 1.6; margin: 0px 0px 1em;">
<div class="post-header-line-1">
</div>
</div>
<div class="post-body entry-content" id="post-body-1115800348824975844" itemprop="description articleBody" style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; position: relative; width: 826px;">
<span style="line-height: 18px;">"Las Vegas attorney Marc John Randazza likes a good fight — particularly if it involves free speech and the First Amendment. </span><span style="line-height: 18px;">He works with the porn industry prosecuting copyright infringement cases and has represented opponents of the Las Vegas Review-Journal’s copyright enforcer Righthaven LLC. Randazza was among the first to criticize Righthaven and its CEO with charges of incompetence and abuse of the courts."</span><br /><div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Source</div>
<div>
<a href="http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2012/sep/24/righthaven-foe-says-cases-are-key-free-speech/" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: initial;">http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2012/sep/24/righthaven-foe-says-cases-are-key-free-speech/</a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
Hey Guess Which Judge Made Sure Which Attorney Got Hundreds of<br />Thousands in Legal Fees? Betcha Can't Guess..<br /><br />Do your Homework Folks, the LAWS Only Apply to<br />the THUG Attorneys who Rule the Courts, in my HUMBLE,<br />Pro Se OPINION. </div>
<br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; text-align: center;">
<b>For More Information Regarding<br /><span style="line-height: 22px;"><a href="http://www.crystalcox.com/2013/02/pro-se-litigant-investigative-blogger.html" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-NJK</a><br /><span style="color: #990000; font-size: medium;">Captain Crystal Cox vs. Rabid Rotten Randazza</span></span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.crystalcox.com/2013/02/pro-se-litigant-investigative-blogger.html" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.crystalcox.com/2013/02/pro-se-litigant-investigative-blogger.html</a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<br style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;" />
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: center;">
<b style="line-height: 18px;">For More Information Regarding </b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
<div style="text-align: center;">
<b style="line-height: 18px;">District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL</b></div>
<b style="line-height: 17.9972px; text-align: center;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><span style="color: #990000; font-size: medium;"> Riddler Randazza V. Courageous Cox</span></span></b><br /><a href="http://www.josephrakofsky.com/2013/02/crystal-l-cox-nevada-lawsuit-pro-se.html" style="color: blue; line-height: 18px; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.josephrakofsky.com/2013/02/crystal-l-cox-nevada-lawsuit-pro-se.html</a><br /><br /><br /><div style="text-align: center;">
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgN9ZCp4__2xW2mrG9iHtezFQQEBYdZEoZ1aJN6ugNd-T-duxRQhZVlvM9EI6RRJPN-yK8PUHTjg09Wxl67lgQrdwrL1CTPc8gJUweW7DHFflvV8XpG6QamOoGbvrhdrvCYgFq67yaUSjWR/s1600/Iviewit+Technologies.jpg" style="background: rgb(34, 34, 34); border-radius: 0px; border: 1px solid transparent; box-shadow: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2) 0px 0px 0px; padding: 8px;" /></div>
<br /><div style="line-height: 18px; text-align: center;">
<b><span style="font-size: medium;">More Information on the iViewit Technology Theft</span></b></div>
<b style="line-height: 18px;"><br /><a href="http://www.iviewit.tv/#Evidence" style="color: blue; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.iviewit.tv/#Evidence</a></b><br /><br style="line-height: 18px;" /><b style="line-height: 18px;">iViewit Technology SEC Complaint</b><br /><a href="http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf" style="color: blue; line-height: 18px; text-decoration-line: none;">http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf</a><br /><b style="line-height: 18px;"><br /></b><span style="line-height: 18px;"></span><b style="line-height: 18px;">iViewit RICO Complaint</b><br /><a href="http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RICO%20SIGNED%20COPY%20MED.pdf" style="color: blue; line-height: 18px; text-decoration-line: none;">http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RICO%20SIGNED%20COPY%20MED.pdf</a><br /><br /><br /><b>NOTE:</b> There SHALL be No Parody, No Mocking, NO First Amendment Exercising, No Gripe Sites, No Review Sites, and not a WORD Spoken of the Riddler, Marc J. Rabid Randazza of Randazza Evil Group. Or thou shall have their First Amendment Privileges Smited."</div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
<br /></div>
Originally Posted at<br />
<a href="http://crystalcoxmedia.blogspot.com/2013/03/pro-se-litigant-investigative-blogger.html" target="_blank">http://crystalcoxmedia.blogspot.com/2013/03/pro-se-litigant-investigative-blogger.html</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-60059903601777363122017-10-20T22:12:00.000-07:002017-10-25T09:26:17.877-07:00First Amendment Attorney Marc J. Randazza SUES blogger Crystal L. Cox to Suppress her Speech. 5 years later wants her to pay his legal fees for his Unconstitutional Retaliatory Lawsuit against her. $350,000 to SUE a Blogger over a $10 Domain Name that Trademark Attorney, Domain Name, First Amendment Expert Marc Randazza was to damn dumb to buy. WOW. Check out these BILLS folks. All to suppress the speech of someone speaking critical of big baby Marc Randazza.<b>Retaliatory RIPOFF RAT Ronald Green</b> sure does charge his partner, partners wife and child a WHOLE lot of money for RETALIATION against a Whistleblower exposing him and speaking critical of him. WOW 262k and counting to TRY and take away my First Amendment Rights. What a Bunch of EVIL Dirty Jackasses.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjkiDcW20xQ74Ee-d0AiCxCYgd8mnM8OFKE-huMru7dUmJy1415kWBxmDnxm7NE9_IaT-cs-1inJ-KUAjPA6EDhH6cGwxqhikTaxuOSIEdDwNqUKt1oiakFM4__1bjcQMHaQCLPrHYJgbM/s1600/RooshCoxRandazza.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="506" data-original-width="900" height="223" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjkiDcW20xQ74Ee-d0AiCxCYgd8mnM8OFKE-huMru7dUmJy1415kWBxmDnxm7NE9_IaT-cs-1inJ-KUAjPA6EDhH6cGwxqhikTaxuOSIEdDwNqUKt1oiakFM4__1bjcQMHaQCLPrHYJgbM/s400/RooshCoxRandazza.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
CHECK OUT<b> THIS 262,000 BILL</b>. wow.. HATE TO SEE WHAT HE CHARGES ATTORNEYS THAT ARE NOT HIS PARTNER OR BOSS...<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiUlh4MlpYdjAxOVk/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiUlh4MlpYdjAxOVk/view?usp=sharing</a><br />
<br />
And Check out<b> this 111,000 bill</b> .. WOW. Sure cost alot to SUE a blogger for calling you names.<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiMGdRSGRPZVMzLVE/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiMGdRSGRPZVMzLVE/view?usp=sharing</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjWHcI6ptk1OEg1ZtyOsWL92Oq5Mh_udFqJzQBFZG2DHsYZ0yzP_EEmUBkbkcF8YpeNsSJMQ2VuZcHugLnIijrDP_yA9nrfGakL1cmXouMrWnBUFNLMDQ1vk42HtiLEuuhJMtRIqvQY79g/s1600/r1112488-dctau7-sn5ymsls9c.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="642" data-original-width="1024" height="250" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjWHcI6ptk1OEg1ZtyOsWL92Oq5Mh_udFqJzQBFZG2DHsYZ0yzP_EEmUBkbkcF8YpeNsSJMQ2VuZcHugLnIijrDP_yA9nrfGakL1cmXouMrWnBUFNLMDQ1vk42HtiLEuuhJMtRIqvQY79g/s400/r1112488-dctau7-sn5ymsls9c.png" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Also Check Out</b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://UnethicalScumattorney.blogspot.com/</a></b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;"><b>Marc Randazza</b></span></a></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-62767246955789341672017-08-07T20:23:00.001-07:002017-08-07T20:23:17.302-07:00Attorney Marc Randazza is a Gang Stalking Online expert indeed. He works with gangs of attorneys that harass people online and RUIN lives.I notified the courts, the authorities, the FBI long ago.When <a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a> does not agree with your <b>"content"</b> he simply gets an UNCONSTITUTIONAL TRO to Suppress your Speech. Marc Randazza Simply gets Godaddy, Google, and the Courts to take your websites, steal your domain names and simply remove you from the search engines. He takes your domain names and websites and redirects them to his blog page defaming you.<br />
<br />
When you Speak Critical of <a href="http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a> he gets his gang stalking attorneys (internet trolls) to stalk you, to post hate about you, to threaten you physical harm, to ruin your business friendships and life in general and they do this for years on end. Some of their victims kill themselves, and they press them to do it.<br />
<br />
Marc Randazza will NOT allow you to speak critical of him. Well and go on about your life that is. His gang stalking trolls are mostly attorneys, so they post in law magazines, they file amicus briefs in federal court, they conspire with attorneys in any case you may be in, they network at every level to discredit you, meanwhile they text you and threaten and intimidate you constantly.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://ia601602.us.archive.org/4/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918.1.1.pdf" target="_blank">Marc Randazza</a> will sue you so he can get phone numbers you called, your bank information and depose family, friends and clients and stalk you some more with all that knowledge.<br />
<br />
These gang stalkers including attorneys, law websites, and lot's more, well they have "clout" you see, and they go on Fox news, NPR, and interview with FORBES and they make sure to ruin YOUR LIFE with lies, as the scumbag gang stalking attorney is taken "SERIOUS" and you are simply "Dismissed".<br />
<br />
I am Glad to here about the latest case Monica Foster talks about in the video below. I pray this will shed a whole lot of LIGHT and "Crystal Clear" precedent.<br />
<br />
Also Check Out the <a href="http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" target="_blank">Randazza vs. Cox case in Nevada</a>, some of the motions discuss the TRO and how Marc Randazza deals with Free Speech he does not like. ALL the blogs, websites, domain names in Marc's complaint and more intellectual property was simply TAKEN by Marc Randazza. No Trial, no Jury, no Judgement, just an Unconstitutional TRO. Check it out.<br />
<a href="http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" target="_blank">http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html</a><br />
<br />
Click Below to Read my Complaint against Marc Randazza and the Gang, to the best of my Pro Se ability to fight back<br />
<a href="http://ia601602.us.archive.org/4/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918.1.1.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia601602.us.archive.org/4/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918/gov.uscourts.nvd.92918.1.1.pdf</a><br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: blue;">Emotional Distress, Invasion of Privacy, and Intimidation.</span></b> Incite Hate and Stalking. This is EXACTLY what Marc Randazza and his gang stalking attorneys do. They also use so called <b>"credible" </b>outlets to trash who they don't like or agree with or who will not do as they say. They did it to ME, they did to Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers and countless others. This legal action is AMAZING. Of course Marc is representing the guy, if the guy loses Marc and his buddies lose the ONLY way they win case, by gang stalking harassing those in the cases they want to LOSE so they can set a precedent for THEMSELVES.<br />
<br />
Thank you Alexandra Mayers for your continued work in shedding light on this VERY important Issue that has harmed so many.<br />
<br />
<b>Alexandra Mayers LIVE: </b><br />
Does the lawyer defending neo-nazi troll <b>Andrew Anglin</b> know where he is?<br />
<br />
<div style="height: 0px; padding-bottom: 367.313px; position: relative;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/-7GUmFBUm_Y?ecver=2" style="height: 367.313px; left: 0px; position: absolute; width: 653px;" width="640"></iframe></div>
<br />
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-47493261406038828552017-05-04T07:44:00.002-07:002017-05-04T07:44:09.399-07:00YouTube Comment regarding the Integrity of Marc Randazza"<a class="comment-author-text g-hovercard yt-uix-sessionlink spf-link " data-sessionlink="itct=CAcQtnUiEwjw9ue4vNbTAhWNmFUKHY2gCik" data-ytid="UClSKvT2i5n__yNelXSuyQnQ" href="https://www.youtube.com/user/edwardprzydzial" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border: 0px; color: #128ee9; cursor: pointer; font-family: "YouTube Noto", Roboto, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; word-break: break-all;">Edward Przydzial</a><br /><span style="color: #767676;"><span style="font-size: 11px;"><br /></span></span><br />
<div class="comment-renderer-text" role="article" style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; font-family: "YouTube Noto", Roboto, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin: 3px 0px 8px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px;" tabindex="0">
<div class="comment-renderer-text-content expanded" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 8px; max-height: none; overflow: hidden; padding: 0px; white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">
mr. randazza needs to be asked only one question in my book and that is why <a class="yt-uix-servicelink " data-servicelink="CAcQtnUiEwjw9ue4vNbTAhWNmFUKHY2gCik" data-url="http://pornwikileaks.com" href="http://pornwikileaks.com/" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; color: #167ac6; cursor: pointer; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none;">http://pornwikileaks.com</a> exists... and he can't say it's freedom of speech or it's against suppression of the press... </div>
<div class="comment-renderer-text-content expanded" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 8px; max-height: none; overflow: hidden; padding: 0px; white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">
<br /></div>
<div class="comment-renderer-text-content expanded" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 8px; max-height: none; overflow: hidden; padding: 0px; white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">
when you go look at that site you'll see the horrid abuse of the internet along with the most hate filled, vile and nasty racist & bigotry ever put in the public domain. rumor has it mr. randazza is supporting and even helping this website... it's authors donald carlos seoane and michael tierney etc. say mr. randazza is deleting things online using dmca and copyright to remove blogs and other informations exposing pornwikileaks? well google, wordpress say legal requests to remove pornwikileaks victim informations was done through an attorney... </div>
<div class="comment-renderer-text-content expanded" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 8px; max-height: none; overflow: hidden; padding: 0px; white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">
<br /></div>
<div class="comment-renderer-text-content expanded" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 8px; max-height: none; overflow: hidden; padding: 0px; white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">
so pornwikileaks is allowed to defame, libel harass and threaten but if you post the facts about it your information is removed by dmca or copyright? using free speech as a weapon to allow pornwikileaks to stay online as well? someone needs to ask mr. randazza to state clearly if he is representing pornwikileaks or not and if he's involved in suppressing the victims of pornwikileaks... answer this mr. randazza because the public needs to know..."</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-87164674037004538652017-04-27T08:59:00.001-07:002017-04-27T08:59:23.870-07:00Marc Randazza had a Reckless Disregard for the TRUTH when, with ACTUAL MALICE, he maliciously DEFAMED his former client Crystal L. Cox. He KNEW for a FACT that what he was posting was NOT TRUE. Yet he Defamed me, Crystal Cox, his former client with ACTUAL MALICE.Marc Randazza continues to be a hypocrite and seriously Full of SHIT. It is EASY to prove Marc Randazza knew he was flat out LYING about Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein. I told him and sent him documents and he flat out lied to courts, national radio stations, blogs and the public at large WITH ACTUAL MALICE. Yet he was rewarded with top of the search engine domain names. Marc Randazza tortures, defames, harasses clients and whom ever he pleases, knowing full well of the ACTUAL truth. He does this to get his way, to win case, to set legal precedents and yet is above the law.<br />
<br />
He violates his clients rights and defames private individuals and public figures and with ACTUAL Malice. No one has a case against Marc Randazza because he is slippery and in my OPINION corrupt and has Judges in his pocket and corner for whatever reason.<br />
<br />
It is rumored that Randazza is one of the porn guys that started the rumor that Melania was an Escort as a model before marrying Trump. Oh well can't trust the rumor mill right?<br />
<br />
Certainly <b>CANNOT Trust Marc Randazza</b><br />
<br />
Marc Randazza DOES NOT believe I have a right to disagree. HE DESTROYS the lives of woman who disagree with him or speak unfriendly about him.<br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: blue;">MARC RANDAZZA DOES NOT ENDORSE YOUR RIGHT TO MAKE "STATEMENTS".</span></b><br />
<br />
This Video is Flat out LIES to get clients by a washed up, bankrupt, corrupt, bully, abusive, malicious attorney who is constantly HYPOCRITICAL. Don't believe a word he says. It is only an Advertisement and in NO Way should be taken as ACTUAL facts about Times vs. Sullivan, the First Amendment or your RIGHT to trash talk your human rights violating, corrupt, bullying attorney.<br />
<br />
Marc Randazza LIED to WIPO and stole mass domain names, wiped out massive web content, STOLE intellectual property, and ruined my life and business as well as put me in constant stress and threats from his lies to the courts, and other entities regarding myself and Iviewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein. Marc Randazza used his influence to STOMP Free SPEECH rights and Steal Intellectual Property and he did so KNOWING full well that what he was saying, swearing to and posting was false. He KNEW the facts and with ACTUAL Malice spread Defamatory LIES.<br />
<br />
Mark Randazz: : You Can Learn From People You Don't Agree With<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3teOQvwLmkY" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3teOQvwLmkY</a><br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: blue; font-size: x-large;">WHAT A CROCK OF SHIT</span></b>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-43773357925188165932016-08-18T01:40:00.000-07:002016-08-18T01:40:05.122-07:00Alexandra Mayers Clark County Nevada Court Filing; Jennifer Randazza / Randazza Legal Group. Ari Bass aKa Michael Whiteacre, Sean Tompkins, Mike South aKa Michael Strother, Marc Randazza.<iframe height="480" src="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bypu5iLNbbmwQzdWblcxNHlaS3M/preview" width="640"></iframe><br />
<br />
Source<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bypu5iLNbbmwQzdWblcxNHlaS3M/view" target="_blank">https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bypu5iLNbbmwQzdWblcxNHlaS3M/view</a><br />
<br />
AND<br />
<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bypu5iLNbbmwUFBmRWtnUHFVLWM/view" target="_blank">https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bypu5iLNbbmwUFBmRWtnUHFVLWM/view</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-38401252280964696722016-08-18T01:16:00.001-07:002016-08-18T01:16:45.467-07:00Alexandra Mayers Reports; "Michael Strother / Mike South states WHO posed as Jennifer Randazza requesting my help, AFTER Marc Randazza offered legal services to Strother to sue me""<span style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px;">Michael Strother / Mike South has stated WHO posed as Jennifer Randazza requesting my help, AFTER Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group offered legal services to Strother (in what appears to be “pro-bono” form) to sue me.</span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin-bottom: 0.7em; margin-top: 0.7em; padding: 0px;">
The following document (complete with exhibits) has been filed and accepted into the United States of America Clark County Nevada Civil Court – case A-14-699072-C Dept. 32</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin-bottom: 0.7em; margin-top: 0.7em; padding: 0px;">
I will post a video blog (vlog) about this issue soon on <a href="http://www.monicaathome.com/" style="color: #3478e3; text-decoration: none;">http://www.MonicaAtHome.com</a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin-bottom: 0.7em; margin-top: 0.7em; padding: 0px;">
click here for the complete filed and stamped copy of the PDF document<br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bypu5iLNbbmwQzdWblcxNHlaS3M/view?usp=sharing" style="color: #3478e3; text-decoration: none;">https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bypu5iLNbbmwQzdWblcxNHlaS3M/view?usp=sharing</a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin-bottom: 0.7em; margin-top: 0.7em; padding: 0px;">
click here for a higher resolution of the exhibits in PDF document format.<br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bypu5iLNbbmwUFBmRWtnUHFVLWM/view?usp=sharing" style="color: #3478e3; text-decoration: none;">https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bypu5iLNbbmwUFBmRWtnUHFVLWM/view?usp=sharing</a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin-bottom: 0.7em; margin-top: 0.7em; padding: 0px;">
<iframe height="480px" src="https://docs.google.com/viewer?srcid=0Bypu5iLNbbmwQzdWblcxNHlaS3M&pid=explorer&efh=false&a=v&chrome=false&embedded=true" width="580px"></iframe></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin-bottom: 0.7em; margin-top: 0.7em; padding: 0px;">
Below is the text of the legal statement filed into the case:</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
On August 16, 2016 porn industry blogger Michael Strother aka Mike South of <a href="http://www.mikesouth.com/" style="color: #3478e3; text-decoration: none;">http://www.MikeSouth.com</a> wrote a post (exhibit A) stating that <b>Sean Matthew Tompkins and Ari Scott Bass posed online (trolled me) as Jennifer Randazza – which is what led me to post the tweets in question (exhibit B) that this lawsuit is based on.</b><br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
I have been told by another porn industry blogger known as Kelli Roberts, that <b>Randazza Legal Group was involved in Sean Matthew Tompkins’ acquisition of a website called LukeIsBack.com</b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
Ari Scott Bass aka Michael Whiteacre was on the initial witness list sent to me from Jennifer Randazza’s legal council (exhibit C).<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
The domestic and international organization, the Aids Healthcare Foundation, recently released a press released which states that Michael Strother aka Mike South is a credible blogger / journalist (exhibit D).</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
Michael Strother told me on Twitter August 13, 2016 that he would take up Mr. Randazza (Marc Randazza’s) offer to sue me if I did not delete the claims I posted online about him being a pimp and being involved in sex trafficking (exhibit E).<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
Michael Strother aka Mike South has also stated that to me via email (exhibit F) as of August 15, 2016 that if I don’t apologize to him for stating that he is a pimp (even though he labeled himself a pimp as of December 4, 2002 and November 26, 2002: exhibits G – H) and involved in sex and human trafficking, that he will sue me.<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
Michael Strother aka Mike South has a multitude of posts (some in which he recruited civilians for his Bukakke pornographic adult movies which are filmed in Atlanta, Georgia), on a website called <a href="http://www.usasexguide.info/" style="color: #3478e3; text-decoration: none;">http://www.USAsexGuide.info</a> (a website that labels itself as a sex travel / sex tourism guide. Sex Tourism is a form of human and sex trafficking). Strother vouched for illegal prostitute’s sexual performances on the website’s forum and offered recommendations to other posters of the website who were seeking to illegally purchase sex (exhibit I).<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
In addition from 2002 to 2011 Michael Strother operated a website called <a href="http://www.streetsofatlanta.com/" style="color: #3478e3; text-decoration: none;">http://www.StreetsOfAtlanta.com</a> (exhibit J) which showcased photographs and stated the exact streets in Atlanta where illegal prostitutes could be located.<br /><br />Strother stated on his own blog MikeSouth.com (exhibit K) that he gained financially from the sexual exploitation of illegal prostitutes, being that the photographs he took of them drew online traffic to his website, which converted into sales of his pornography on his “pay sites”.<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
Michael Stother aka Mike South emailed me September 5, 2014 (exhibit L) stating that Marc Randazza was receptive to the idea that someone was impersonating Jennifer Randazza and that he felt he could arrange for Marc Randazza to drop this lawsuit against me if I apologized.<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
Lastly, August 16, 2016 at 2:20pm (PST) Michael Strother aka Mike South sent me an email stating that “several people” are offering him money to get a judgment in Georgia against me to take all of my websites (exhibit M).<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
Considering Marc Randazza’s offer to Michael Strother to file a lawsuit against me, I believe that Marc Randazza’s and that of Randazza Legal Group’s actions are that criminal conspiracy & illustrate the abuse the United States judicial system to intimidate me, silence my work on the truth of pornography and organized crime (namely sex and human trafficking), harass me and extort money from me via a legal judgment.<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<b>DATED this 16th day of August, 2016.<br /></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
Pursuant to NRS 53.045, I declare under penalty of</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
Alexandra Mayers</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
/s/ Alexandra Mayers</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
Defendant, In Proper Person"</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
Source </div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #555555; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 19.5px; line-height: 27.3px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<a href="http://www.alexandramayerslive.com/2016/08/18/michael-strother-mike-south-states-who-posed-as-jennifer-randazza-requesting-my-help-after-marc-randazza-offered-legal-services-to-strother-to-sue-me/" target="_blank">http://www.alexandramayerslive.com/2016/08/18/michael-strother-mike-south-states-who-posed-as-jennifer-randazza-requesting-my-help-after-marc-randazza-offered-legal-services-to-strother-to-sue-me/</a></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-24819144613810567852016-08-14T16:17:00.001-07:002016-08-14T16:17:14.792-07:00Bankruptcy Cry Baby Victim Marc Randazza. RANDAZZA has me, Crystal Cox the Biggest Creditor in this CASE, yet I have no Rights and my LAWSUIT against him, as my former attorney is simply FROZEN. Marc Randazza, attorney, has used the Nevada Bankruptcy courts as a tool to violate the rights of his former clients, and to STOP legal action again him."Debtor’s misguided criticisms of the IAA are an example of Debtor’s attempt to portray himself as a victim"<br />
<br />
Source and Full Motion<br />
<a href="http://ia801505.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.155.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia801505.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.155.0.pdf</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<b>SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BY </b><b>CREDITORS EXCELSIOR MEDIA </b><b>CORP., AND LIBERTY MEDIA</b><br />
<b>HOLDINGS, LLC TO DETERMINE </b><b>NON-DISCHARGEABILITY OF </b><b>DEBTS</b><br />
<br />
"III. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS<br /><br />
7. Defendant Randazza is the former in-house General Counsel of E/L. Randazza was employed as E/L’s General Counsel continuously from June, 2009 until August 2012.<br /><br />
8. Excelsior is a sister company to various entities including Liberty and Corbin Fisher. Corbin Fisher is an on-line entertainment website and brand name whose intellectual<br />
property is owned by Liberty. Excelsior is a film production company that creates videos for the Corbin Fisher brand.<br /><br />E/L has consistently endeavored to and succeeded at conducting its business in a principled and professional manner. E/L relocated its headquarters from San Diego, California to Las Vegas in February 2011.<br /><br />
9. Randazza also relocated from San Diego, California to Las Vegas in 2011 to continue his employment relationship with E/L. Randazza markets himself as a “specialist” in First Amendment and intellectual property law, particularly with regard to the adult entertainment industry.<br /><br />
10. E/L and Randazza became acquainted while Randazza was an associate at a firm specializing in First Amendment related legal work in Florida. E/L later decided to hire a General Counsel. Randazza pursued and accepted the position. Randazza drafted an employment agreement, which was executed by the parties in June, 2009 (“Employment Agreement”).<br /><br />
Randazza at no time advise Plaintiffs that they should seek independent counsel to review the agreement even though Plaintiffs were obviously unrepresented. During the course of his<br />
employment with E/L, Randazza was an integral part of E/L’s management and, along with several other executives, participated in making many of E/L’s major corporate decisions.<br /><br />
11. The primary reason E/L decided to hire a General Counsel was to ensure its intellectual property was protected. One of the most significant challenges faced by E/L and all companies in the film and entertainment industry is the illegal downloading and sharing of content/videos produced by E/L. However, Randazza was tasked with handling all of E/L’s legal matters.<br /><b><br /></b><br />
<b>A. THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT</b><br /><br />
12. Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Randazza was to wind down his private practice during his first 90 days of employment and become E/L’s full-time General Counsel.<br />
<br />
13. Section “6.C” of the Employment Agreement permitted Randazza to continue to provide professional services to a “limited number of outside clients” during non-working hours if such work did not present a conflict of interest for E/L. Contrary to his obligations under the Employment Agreement and without the knowledge of E/L, Randazza continued to aggressively grow his private practice during his employment after becoming E/L’s General Counsel.<br /><br />
14. Randazza’s compensation consisted of an annual salary of $208,000. Randazza also included in the Employment Agreement the unique arrangement of a nondiscretionary bonus of 25% of any settlement funds paid to E/L.<br />
<br />
15. At the time of the execution of the Employment Agreement, the parties contemplated that Randazza would be handling all of E/L’s legal matters independently. Instead, Randazza began to utilize his own firm, Randazza Legal Group (“RLG”) and various outside counsel to assist in E/L’s legal matters.<br />
<br />
16. The Employment Agreement also required that E/L provide Randazza with a laptop computer and PDA/phone, which were to be primarily used for E/L business with only occasional and incidental personal use permitted. The Employment Agreement further provided that such equipment was not to be used for professional services rendered to other clients.<br />
<br />
17. The Employment Agreement provided for severance in the amount of 12 weeks of salary if E/L were to unilaterally terminate Randazza in the fourth year of employment or later.<br />
<br />
There is no severance obligation if Randazza resigned or was terminated for cause.<br /><br />
18. The Employment Agreement also includes a governing law provision stating “[t]his Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict of laws.” Randazza was able to reside virtually anywhere he wanted. Initially, Randazza lived and worked in San Diego, California. However, Randazza relocated to Las Vegas, Nevada in June 2011, just as few months after E/L relocated its headquarters.<br />
<br />
19. At Randazza’s request, E/L hired Erika Dillon (“Dillon”), a paralegal. Dillon was employed by E/L as a paralegal at the time of Randazza’s resignation. Dillon left her employment after Randazza’s resignation at Randazza’s request B. ISSUES ARISE BETWEEN E/L AND RANDAZZA<br />
<br />
i. <b>Randazza’s Non-E/L Work</b><br /><br />
20. As noted above, under the Employment Agreement Randazza was obligated to wind down his private practice during the first 90 days of his employment with E/L.<br />
<br />
21. After becoming E/L’s General Counsel, however, Randazza kept adding clients to his practice, RLG, and over the period from October 2009 through August 2012, he billed over 1,643 hours to clients for work unrelated to E/L (and not including pro bono work). This amounts to an average of 47 hours per month.<br /><br />During Randazza’s employment at E/L, he never billed less than 14.5 hours in a given month to other clients and in many months he billed between 50 and 90 hours to such clients. During the period from September 2011 through January 2012, Randazza billed 390.65 hours to non-E/L and non-pro bono clients, an average of over 78 hours per month.<br />
<br />
This pattern of extensive and increasing work for non-E/L clients is evidence that Randazza had no intention of winding down his private practice as required by the Employment Agreement.<br />
<br />
22. During his employment with E/L, including during the period from September 2011 through January 2012, E/L paid Randazza’s full salary and benefits, including bar dues in multiple jurisdictions.<br />
<br />
ii. <b>Randazza’s TNAFlix Relationship</b><br /><br />
23. Randazza, through RLG, represented Liberty in a lawsuit that he filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against TNAFlix (“TNA”) (Case. No. 10-CV-1972-JHA-POR) alleging that TNA (a file-sharing website) infringed Liberty’s copyrighted works (the “TNA Matter”). Valentin Gurvits, Esq. (“Gurvits”) of the Boston Law Group, LLP (“Boston Law”) represented TNA.<br />
<br />
24. In December 2010 and January 2011, Randazza and Gurvits negotiated a settlement of the TNA Matter. During the course of those negotiations, Gurvits raised a concern about his client (TNA) being sued by other copyright owners in the future based on the same or similar allegations made by Liberty against TNA in the TNA matter.<br /><br />In an email dated December 7, 2010, Randazza advised Gurvits that he “could largely prevent other plaintiffs from entering the fray.”<br />
<br />
25. According to Randazza, Gurvits wanted to pay Randazza a “fee” of $5,000 in order to conflict Randazza out of future cases against TNA. In an email dated December 22, 2010, Randazza responded to Gurvits’ offer as follows:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<b><span style="color: blue;">As far as conflicting me out of future cases, that will require significantly more than $5,000. In fact, I have someone waiting in the wings with a $50k retainer right now. Naturally, I’m in a strange ethical bind, as your offer to conflict me out of future cases against your client is something that would benefit my current client. Accordingly, I would be willing to be conflicted out of cases against TNA, but that $5k figure has to come up. Either that, or you can give [Liberty] what they asked for, and I’ll conflict myself out for a token payment</span></b></blockquote>
26. Randazza and Gurvits continued to discuss the prospect of conflicting Randazza out of future cases against TNA during the course of negotiating a settlement of the TNA Matter.<br />
<br />
For example, on January 11, 2011 Randazza wrote in an email to Gurvits:<br /><br />
<span style="color: blue;"><b>Keeping me out of the TNA game is a little more complicated.</b></span><br />
<span style="color: blue;"><b>If your client wants to keep me personally out of the TNA game, then I think that there needs to be a little grave for me. And it has to be more than the $5k you were talking about before, I’m looking at the cost of at least a new Carrera in retainer deposits after circulating around the adult entertainment expo this week. I’m gonna want at least used BMW money.</b></span><br />
<br />
In order to conflict me out of future matters, I suggest this:<br /><br />
<span style="color: blue;"><b>Your firm retains me as “of counsel” to you. I get $5k per month (for six months) paid to me, from you (TNA will reimburse you, I presume). I will render advice on TNA and TNA only, and I’ll be Chinese walled from your other clients so that other conflicts are not created.</b></span><br />
<br />
*******************************<br /><br />
That way, I’m adequately compensated for my loss of major potential work, and I’m conflicted out of acting adversely to TNA.<br />
<br />
27. On January 12, 2011, Randazza apparently discovered that he was ethically prohibited from discussing limitations on his right to practice law during the course of settlement negotiations on behalf of a client, and sent an email to Gurvits saying that he could no longer discuss it, saying: “But I’m certain now that such an arrangement is unethical, in the terms we’ve been discussing it.” Nevertheless, Randazza recommended finding “some other way of addressing [TNA’s] interests,” and stated as follows:<br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: blue;">Like I said before, if TNA wants to hire me *after* settlement, on terms that we discuss *after* settlement, then my phone line will be open.<br /></span></b><br />
<b><span style="color: blue;">However, it seems that if we place any part of a “buyoff” as a condition of settlement, then all four of us could wind up in bar trouble. I’m certainly not risking it</span></b>.<br />
<br />
28. On February 1, 2011, Liberty signed a Settlement Agreement and General Release of Claims (the “TNA Settlement Agreement”) under which Liberty agreed to dismiss its claims against TNA without prejudice in exchange for payment of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00).<br />
<br />
The next day (February 2, 2011) and before Randazza had even received the signature of Gurvits’ client on the TNA Settlement Agreement and the sameday that Randazza received the settlement payment from TNA, Randazza sent an email to Gurvits asking if TNA wanted “a retainer letter form [him].”<br />
<br />
29. On February 11, 2011 Randazza emailed Gurvits a draft retainer letter from TNA to sign, which required a $36.000.00 retainer to be paid at the outset of the representation and deemed to be earned upon receipt. TNA did not, however, immediately sign the retainer letter, Randazza wrote to Gruvits in late June 2011 stating, “You will recall that I am not conflicted out of representing another client against [TNA].”<br />
<br />
Source and Full Document, Case Filing<br />
<a href="http://ia801505.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.156.0.pdf" target="_blank">http://ia801505.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.156.0.pdf</a><br />
<br />
How in the WORLD is Marc Randazza still a Lawyer? WOWUnknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-47285563019450767392016-08-14T15:54:00.002-07:002016-08-14T15:54:01.470-07:00Sue Sue Sue. Chill Speech Chill Speech. First Amendment Attorney, Law Firm Randazza Legal Group LOVES to SUE people to SILENCE them. And all in the Name of Free Speech. Meanwhile he hides behind a bankruptcy court in Cox v. Randazza, with NO end in sight. <b>Porn Blogger Mike South aka Michael Strother </b>THREATENS to Sue Monica Foster. oH and for FREE with us of Unconstitutional, Unethical attorney Marc Randazza of Rabid Randazza Legal Group.<br /><br />There are so many people that Marc Randazza has offered to represent for FREE to Silence Free Speech that exposes him. oh and to RETALIATE. Meanwhile he does not even have the stamina to stay in legal cases with us, he has to HIDE in bankruptcy court while doing FREE legal work out of unethical SPITE.<br />
<br />
So, this Guy, Mike South aka Michael Strother, calls himself a PIMP and then threatens to Sue others who call him a Pimp too? WTF<br />
<br />
<img height="418" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhlV029yicnTK4BRRg09spfLtiE5ejbeDFqjWI99xMjnp-dphnZjgGzvgn5zRv3exnTvzRovwKLiCTXyEWzgZQYuEJb9cgpCaCxuTmuhEH-IzI-quB_2Lz7ys9ecsNePL-hTxqvqxL0YY0/s640/the+win+tweet.jpg" width="640" /><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white;">"<span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;">How in the hell would Randazza Legal Group attorneys (</span><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHjZutIAbF0" style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">who've already filed one fraudulent lawsuit against me in regards to Jennifer Randazza's attachment to organized crime</a><span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;">) and Michael Strother explain the above to a Judge? In addition how will Randazza Legal Group explain to a Judge that they are offering their legal services pro-bono to self labeled PIMPS (who are not owners and/or operators of legal brothels in Nevada) - all in effort to silence individuals who have opted to share the truth about sex trafficking and the adult entertainment industry?</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><br style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;" /><span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;">According to wikipedia and many other sources - a pimp is a sex trafficker.</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_trafficking%C2%A0" style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_trafficking </a><br style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;" /><br style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;" /><b style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;"><a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pimp" style="text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Definition of “PIMP” according to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary</a>: a criminal who is associated with, usually exerts control over, and lives off the earnings of one or more prostitutes<a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pimp" style="text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pimp</a></b><br style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;" /><br style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;" /><span style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;">I will not be apologizing to Mike South aka Michael Strother. In addition, he will not be suing me for "libel", as his entire proposed lawsuit has no legitimacy or merit.</span><br style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;" /><br style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;" /><b style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;">I encourage you all to read and sign this petition I wrote, just a day prior to Mike South aka Michael Strother's lawsuit threat: <a href="https://www.change.org/p/michael-weinstein-aids-healthcare-foundation-differentiate-illegal-prostitutes-from-legitimate-pornstars" style="text-decoration: none;">https://www.change.org/p/michael-weinstein-aids-healthcare-foundation-differentiate-illegal-prostitutes-from-legitimate-pornstars</a>"</b></span><br />
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;"><b style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;"><br /></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;"><b style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;">Source of Above</b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;"><b style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;"><a href="http://monicafoster.blogspot.com/2016/08/mike-south-aka-michael-strother-has.html?zx=aaef98911fdb548f" target="_blank">http://monicafoster.blogspot.com/2016/08/mike-south-aka-michael-strother-has.html?zx=aaef98911fdb548f</a></b></span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;"><div>
<b>Mike South aka Michael Strother has threatened to sue me for my stating what he's labeled himself as - a PIMP</b><br /></div>
<div>
On August 13, 2016 veteran porn blogger Mike South aka Michael Strother stated that he would take <b><span style="color: blue;">Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group's offer to sue me (apparently Randazza offered his legal services to Strother pro-bono)</span></b>. Strother indicated that he would sue me for "libel" because I claimed that he is a pimp and involved in sex trafficking.<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhfNJZpjRwP2ENYGOLD2jsfUMKXsEa1jgl9z6qkxdNggsHQbTCGOQ_MLWHw977kGy9zhToIfWsS7SiC0zTpWvbOKYBT3tggWYOHMbFtHGo0fosWe1OaYORF9kzyAIX7_l910aKGpO2E6Lc/s1600/lawsuit+threat.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhfNJZpjRwP2ENYGOLD2jsfUMKXsEa1jgl9z6qkxdNggsHQbTCGOQ_MLWHw977kGy9zhToIfWsS7SiC0zTpWvbOKYBT3tggWYOHMbFtHGo0fosWe1OaYORF9kzyAIX7_l910aKGpO2E6Lc/s1600/lawsuit+threat.jpg" /></a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
</span></div>
<div>
<b style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;">Source of Above</b></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;"><b style="font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 13.2px; line-height: 18.48px;"><a href="http://monicafoster.blogspot.com/2016/08/mike-south-aka-michael-strother-has.html?zx=aaef98911fdb548f" target="_blank">http://monicafoster.blogspot.com/2016/08/mike-south-aka-michael-strother-has.html?zx=aaef98911fdb548f</a></b></span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;">I wonder what Marc Randazza's Creditors think of all his Pro Bono legal cases he offers and takes, and all in the name of REVENGE and nothing to do with Justice or making money to pay off his CREDITORS. </span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;">Marc Randazza Bankruptcy</span></div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white;"><a href="http://ia601505.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.docket.html" target="_blank">http://ia601505.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.docket.html</a></span></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Randazza vs. Crystal Cox Free Speech Suppression Case Docket</div>
<div>
<a href="http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html" target="_blank">http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html</a></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-72442773290537969702016-07-27T01:01:00.001-07:002016-07-27T01:01:42.350-07:00Foxx and Foster - Racist threats attached to The Luxury Companion, Pornwikileaks & Randazza<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/si6O3pR3Ca8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-79265751068668791662016-07-25T01:15:00.001-07:002016-07-25T01:15:19.652-07:00Randazza Legal Group - porn & pedophile attorneys suing a whistleblower for $167,871<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/yHjZutIAbF0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4704955324273995110.post-42547455643452744572016-07-25T01:05:00.001-07:002016-07-25T01:05:02.430-07:00Channon Rose fka Randi Wright shares a scary story about an agency like The Luxury Companion<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/vBGAdVLBVOE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com