Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Hey Randazza Legal Group and the Legal Satyricon Blog Authors. YOU may Want to File an Amicus Brief in Support of MY Position in the Obsidian v. Cox Appeal. Or at Least in Support of the First Amendment, supporting neither side. Grow a Set Boys.

Why is Marc Randazza, so Called First Amendment Advocate, Standing By watching the Obsidian Vs. Cox Case Play out and DOING NOTHING to Support YOUR First Amendment Rights?

The Obsidian Finance Group LLC v. Blogger Crystal Cox is The Biggest Court Case Ever Facing the issue of the rights of New Media Bloggers and First Amendment Rights Online.

Randazza Legal Group, Marc Randazza of the Blog "Legal Satyricon" is letting this happen because he is "Butthurt" that a Blogger Smarter than his Dumb Ass, Registered the Domain Name MarcRandazza.com and so, Marc Randazza is making all of you bloggers Collateral Damage in his WAR with Blogger Crystal Cox.

All of you rabid bloggers in the PopeHate Kenneth White and Marc Randazza Lynch Mob Defaming Blogger Crystal Cox, who is really fighting corruption and trying to make the world a better place, well you need this Verdict overturned, yet you do NOTHING.

Marc Randazza is NOT standing up for the First Amendment Rights of blogs such as PopeHate.com, Philly Law Blog, Randazza's Own Legal Satyricon Blog, Kashmir Hill of Forbes, NPR's Hate against Crystal Cox, Damian Penny Blog, Newspaper Death Watch Blog, Richard Demanuel Blog, SaltyDroid, Siouxsie Law Blog and Thousands more Just Like It.

The PopeHate.com Blog by Attorney Kenneth White and Marc Randazza's Lynch Mob, and all those connected Blog Networks, tends to trash talk people regularly, they even threaten knee caps, post what kind of car women in the porn industry drive to threaten them, they stalk and harass these people and use the search engines to ruin the lives of those who will not do as they wish.  You folks certainly are going to NEED Obsidian V. Cox overturned or GUESS WHAT Dumbshits, you're Next.

So why is, Idle, Coward Attorney Marc Randazza NOT Standing in Support of the Crystal Cox side of the Obsidian V. Cox Case?  Is this standoff really in the best interest of Bloggers, of New Media and of First Amendment Rights?

Alleged First Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza is NOT Standing in Support of First Amendment Rights for ALL Bloggers and New Media and in essence the entire Porn Industry Online. Marc Randazza is making ALL of YOU the Collateral Damage of his Petty Dick Swinging Contest with Lesbian Blogger Crystal Cox (not my porn name).

Attention Marc Randazza and your Army of THUGS;  I am a Mama Grizzly Bear, The victims of corruption are my cubs. YOU will NOT scare me, nor run me off and if you harm me or kill me, I will only get stronger in the search engines of New MEDIA. Power to the People, by the Power of Internet Marketing and the BLOGS that Expose Evil, WITHOUT THE PERMISSION of Corporate and Corruption Sponsored "Big Media" aKa Traditional Media. 

You will all have to Live with this Precedence, and it will FOREVER be NOTED that Marc Randazza is NO Supporter of Free Speech. It will be Eternally Memoralized, that when self proclaimed First Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza had his big chance back in 2012 to make a Stand for your First Amendment Rights in New Media. Marc Randazza sat back and simply made a mess of it because he got his feelings hurt by the big bad blogger Batshit Crazy Crystal Cox.

Marc Randazza is allegedly world renowned for First Amendment Rights, and protecting bloggers, websites, media companies, porn companies, Rush Limbaugh and more from frivolous legal action and First Amendment Rights Violations. Yet, because Marc Randazza is throwing a whiny fit, mad at this female blogger, he DOES nothing to protect your RIGHTS, though he has the power to do so.

Marc Randazza should file an Amicus Brief In Support of the Issues. Marc Randazza should support bloggers rights in one of his famous CNN or Fox News Yammer Sessions. But instead BUTTHURT Rabid Randazza let's ALL of YOU lose your First Amendment Rights, and he puts in no effort to support the First Amendment. All because he is BUTTHURT.

Guess What Guys, Retraction Laws Do NOT even Apply To You. You Can be Sued for 10 Million Dollars and the Plaintiff does not even have to ask you to remove a post or tell you its not factual. 

And Remember Extortion was NOT part of the Obsidian V. Cox Case (Use your Brain and your Reading Skills). Crystal Cox was not Charged with, nor On Trial for, Extortion.  It is Smoke and Mirrors that Marc Randazza and the Plaintiff in Obsidian v. Cox put up, in order to protect Portland Oregon Corruption, oh and seek revenge for being smarter than Marc Randazza.

Real First Amendment Rights Advocates are Speaking Up. 

Check Out this Amicus Brief from ScotusBlog.com

ScotusBlog.com Submits Amicus Brief in Obsidian Vs. Cox Appeal Supporting No Party and In Support of the Issue At Stake for All Bloggers, Citizen Journalists and New Media Blogs.

ScotusBlog.com, Thomas Goldstein Files Motion for Leave to File an Amicus Brief in the Obsidian Finance Group, LLC et al., v. Crystal Cox Appeal.  Thomas C. Goldstein submits this Amicus Brief Supporting No Party and In Support of the Issue At Stake for All Bloggers, Citizen Journalists and New Media Blogs.

ScotusBlog.com, Thomas C. Goldstein Says,  "As a "blog" that provides a useful public service to several million readers each year, but is nonetheless unable to satisfy most of the criteria for "media" indentified by the district court in this case, the blog has an interest in the this case because of the prospect that it too would be unable to avail itself of the protections prrovided by the First Amendment and could face potential liability in a lawsuit for libel or defamation."

Read the Full ScotusBlog.com, Thomas C. Goldstein Amicus Brief Below

ScotusBlog.com Amicus Brief Regarding Obsidian Vs. Cox Appeal




Check Out this Amicus Brief from

Obsidian Finance Group LLC v. Cox Ninth Circuit Appeal: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press Amicus Brief.

Anti-Corruption Blogger Crystal Cox Sued for Defamation. 

Portland Oregon Federal Judge Says Bloggers are Not Journalists and BLOGS are Not Media. Blogger Denied the Protection of the First Amendment, Shield Laws, Anti-Slapp Laws and Retraction Laws. Thereby Protecting conflicts of interest and corruption among Portland Oregon's Top Law Firms, Attorney and Judges.

the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press Amicus Brief

Of Course there is the First Amendment Rights Super Star Attorney Eugene Volokh who is actually making a difference in the First Amendment Rights of All. 


Here is the Obsidian Vs. Cox Appeal Opening Brief.


  Eugene Volokh, Crystal L. Cox Appeal. Obsidian Vs. Cox Appeal Opening Brief


more on the Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal L. Cox Case